Sex differences have been identified in a number of black-capped chickadee vocalizations and in the chick-a-dee calls of other chickadee species [i.e., Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis)]. In the current study, 12 acoustic features in black-capped chickadee chick-a-dee calls were investigated, including both frequency and duration measurements. Using permuted discriminant function analyses, these features were examined to determine if any features could be used to identify the sex of the caller. Only one note type (A notes) classified male and female calls at levels approaching significance. In particular, a permuted discriminant function analysis revealed that the start frequency of A notes best allowed for categorization between the sexes compared to any other acoustic parameter. This finding is consistent with previous research on Carolina chickadee chick-a-dee calls that found that the starting frequency differed between male- and female-produced A notes [Freeberg, Lucas, and Clucas (2003). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2127–2136]. Taken together, these results and the results of studies with other chickadee species suggest that sex differences likely exist in the chick-a-dee call, specifically acoustic features in A notes, but that more complex features than those addressed here may be associated with the sex of the caller.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
September 09 2016
An investigation of sex differences in acoustic features in black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) chick-a-dee calls
Kimberley A. Campbell;
Kimberley A. Campbell
Department of Psychology,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Allison H. Hahn;
Allison H. Hahn
a)
Department of Psychology,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Jenna V. Congdon;
Jenna V. Congdon
Department of Psychology,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher B. Sturdy
Christopher B. Sturdy
b)
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Current address: Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin,-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
b)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 1598–1608 (2016)
Article history
Received:
March 02 2016
Accepted:
August 12 2016
Citation
Kimberley A. Campbell, Allison H. Hahn, Jenna V. Congdon, Christopher B. Sturdy; An investigation of sex differences in acoustic features in black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) chick-a-dee calls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2016; 140 (3): 1598–1608. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4962281
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
Individual acoustic differences in female black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) fee-bee songs
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2021)
Feature weighting in “chick-a-dee” call notes of Poecile atricapillus
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2007)
Artificial neural network discrimination of black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) call notes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2006)
Note types and coding in Parid vocalizations: The chick-a-dee call of the boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2011)
Using an artificial neural network to classify black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) call note types
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2006)