Sex differences have been identified in a number of black-capped chickadee vocalizations and in the chick-a-dee calls of other chickadee species [i.e., Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis)]. In the current study, 12 acoustic features in black-capped chickadee chick-a-dee calls were investigated, including both frequency and duration measurements. Using permuted discriminant function analyses, these features were examined to determine if any features could be used to identify the sex of the caller. Only one note type (A notes) classified male and female calls at levels approaching significance. In particular, a permuted discriminant function analysis revealed that the start frequency of A notes best allowed for categorization between the sexes compared to any other acoustic parameter. This finding is consistent with previous research on Carolina chickadee chick-a-dee calls that found that the starting frequency differed between male- and female-produced A notes [Freeberg, Lucas, and Clucas (2003). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2127–2136]. Taken together, these results and the results of studies with other chickadee species suggest that sex differences likely exist in the chick-a-dee call, specifically acoustic features in A notes, but that more complex features than those addressed here may be associated with the sex of the caller.

1.
Avey
,
M. T.
,
Kanyo
,
R. A.
,
Irwin
,
E. L.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2008
). “
Differential effects of vocalization type, singer and listener on ZENK immediate early gene response in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)
,”
Behav. Brain Res.
188
,
201
208
.
2.
Betz
,
N. E.
(
1987
). “
Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research
,”
J. Couns. Psychol.
34
,
393
403
.
3.
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
,
Charrier
,
I.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2004
). “
Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. II: The chick-a-dee call of the mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
82
,
780
793
.
4.
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
,
Phillmore
,
L. S.
,
Weisman
,
R. G.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2005
). “
Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. III: The chick-a-dee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
83
,
820
833
.
5.
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2008
). “
All ‘chick-a-dee’ calls are not created equally: Part I. Open-ended categorization of chick-a-dee calls by sympatric and allopatric chickadees
,”
Behav. Process.
77
,
73
86
.
6.
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
,
Sturdy
,
C. B.
,
Phillmore
,
L. S.
, and
Weisman
,
R. G.
(
2003
). “
Open-ended categorization of chick-a-dee calls by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla)
,”
J. Comp. Psychol.
117
,
290
301
.
7.
Carter
,
G. G.
,
Skowronski
,
M. D.
,
Faure
,
P. A.
, and
Fenton
,
B.
(
2008
). “
Antiphonal calling allows individual discrimination in white-winged vampire bats
,”
Anim. Behav.
76
,
1343
1355
.
8.
Charrier
,
I.
,
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2004
). “
Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. I: The chick-a-dee call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
82
,
769
779
.
9.
Ficken
,
M. S.
,
Ficken
,
R. W.
, and
Witkin
,
R. S.
(
1978
). “
Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee
,”
Auk
95
,
34
48
.
10.
Fitch
,
W. T.
(
1999
). “
Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds by tracheal elongation: Comparative and theoretical analyses
,”
J. Zool.
248
,
31
49
.
11.
Freeberg
,
T. M.
,
Lucas
,
J. R.
, and
Clucas
,
B.
(
2003
). “
Variation in chick-a-dee calls of a Carolina chickadee population, Poecile carolinensis: Identity and redundancy within note types
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2127
2136
.
12.
Griffiths
,
R.
,
Double
,
M. C.
,
Orr
,
K.
, and
Dawson
,
R. J.
(
1998
). “
A DNA test to sex most birds
,”
Mol. Ecol.
7
,
1071
1075
.
13.
Guillette
,
L. M.
,
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
,
Batty
,
E. R.
,
Dawson
,
M. R. W.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2010a
). “
Black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli) contact call contains species, sex, and individual identity features
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
1116
1123
.
14.
Guillette
,
L. M.
,
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
,
Batty
,
E. R.
,
Dawson
,
M. R.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2010b
). “
Development of a contact call in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) hand-reared in different acoustic environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
2249
2256
.
15.
Hahn
,
A. H.
,
Krysler
,
A.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2013
). “
Female song in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): Acoustic song features that contain individual identity information and sex differences
,”
Behav. Process.
98
,
98
105
.
16.
Hughes
,
M.
,
Nowicki
,
S.
, and
Lohr
,
B.
(
1998
). “
Call learning in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus): The role of experience in the development of ‘chick-a-dee’ calls
,”
Ethol.
104
,
232
249
.
17.
IBM Corporation (
2011
). “
IBM SPSS statistics for Windows
,” version 20.0, Armonk, NY.
18.
Kroodsma
,
D. E.
, and
Miller
,
E. H.
(eds.). (
1996
). “
Comparative analysis of vocal repetoires, with reference to chickadees
,” in
Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds
(
Cornell University Press
,
New York
), pp.
136
159
.
19.
Mammen
,
D. L.
, and
Nowicki
,
S.
(
1981
). “
Individual differences and within-flock convergence in chickadee calls
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
9
,
179
186
.
20.
Mundry
,
R.
, and
Sommer
,
C.
(
2007
). “
Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: Consequences and an alternative
,”
Anim. Behav.
74
,
965
976
.
21.
Nowicki
,
S.
(
1983
). “
Flock-specific recognition of chickadee calls
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
12
,
317
320
.
22.
Nowicki
,
S.
(
1989
). “
Vocal plasticity in captive black-capped chickadees: The acoustic basis and rate of call convergence
,”
Anim. Behav.
37
,
64
73
.
23.
Nowicki
,
S.
, and
Nelson
,
D. A.
(
1990
). “
Defining natural categories in acoustic signals: Comparison of three methods applied to ‘chick-a-dee’ call notes
,”
Ethol.
86
,
89
101
.
24.
Proppe
,
D. S.
,
Bloomfield
,
L. L.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2010
). “
Acoustic transmission of the chick-a-dee call of the black capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus): Forest structure and note function
,”
Can. J. Zool.
88
,
788
794
.
25.
Proppe
D. S.
, and
Sturdy
,
C. B.
(
2009
). “
The effect of schedules of reinforcement on the composition of spontaneous and evoked black-capped chickadee calls
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
212
,
3016
3025
.
26.
Pyle
,
P.
(
1997
).
Identification Guide to North American Birds
(
Slate Creek
,
Bolinas, CA
), pp.
4
8
.
27.
R Core Team (
2013
). “
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
28.
Smith
,
S. M.
(
1991
).
The Black-Capped Chickadee: Behavioral Ecology and Natural History
(
Cornell University Press
,
Ithaca, NY
), pp.
1
89
.
29.
Sokal
,
R. R.
, and
Rohlf
,
F. J.
(
1995
).
Biometry
, 3rd ed. (
W. H. Freeman and Co.
,
New York
).
30.
Tabachnick
,
B. G.
, and
Fidell
,
L. S.
(
2007
).
Using Multivariate Statistics
, 5th ed. (
Pearson Education
,
Boston
).
31.
Templeton
,
C. N.
,
Greene
,
E.
, and
Davis
,
K.
(
2005
). “
Allometry of alarm calls: Black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size
,”
Science
308
,
1934
1937
.
32.
Venables
,
W. N.
, and
Ripley
,
B. D.
(
2002
).
Modern Applied Statistics with S
, 4th ed. (
Springer
,
New York
).
33.
Weihs
,
C.
,
Ligges
,
U.
,
Luebke
,
K.
, and
Raabe
,
N.
(
2005
). “
klaR analyzing German business cycles
,” in
Data Analysis and Decision Support
, edited by
D.
Baier
,
R.
Decker
, and
L.
Schmidt-Thieme
(
Springer
,
Berlin
), pp.
335
343
.
You do not currently have access to this content.