Spectral smearing causes, at least partially, that cochlear implant (CI) users require a higher signal-to-noise ratio to obtain the same speech intelligibility as normal hearing listeners. A spectral contrast enhancement (SCE) algorithm has been designed and evaluated as an additional feature for a standard CI strategy. The algorithm keeps the most prominent peaks within a speech signal constant while attenuating valleys in the spectrum. The goal is to partly compensate for the spectral smearing produced by the limited number of stimulation electrodes and the overlap of electrical fields produced in CIs. Twelve CI users were tested for their speech reception threshold (SRT) using the standard CI coding strategy with and without SCE. No significant differences in SRT were observed between conditions. However, an analysis of the electrical stimulation patterns shows a reduction in stimulation current when using SCE. In a second evaluation, 12 CI users were tested in a similar configuration of the SCE strategy with the stimulation being balanced between the SCE and the non-SCE variants such that the loudness perception delivered by the strategies was the same. Results show a significant improvement in SRT of 0.57 dB (p < 0.0005) for the SCE algorithm.
References
1.
Alexander
, J. M.
, Jenison
, R. L.
, and Kluender
, K. R.
(2011
). “Real-time contrast enhancement to improve speech recognition
,” PloS One
6
(9
), e24630
.2.
Baer
, T.
, Moore
, B. C.
, and Gatehouse
, S.
(1993
). “Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: Effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times
,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
30
(1
), 49
–72
.3.
Bhattacharya
, A.
, Vandali
, A.
, and Zeng
, F.-G.
(2011
). “Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(5
), 2951
–2960
.4.
Bhattacharya
, A.
, and Zeng
, F.-G.
(2007
). “Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
(2
), 1079
–1089
.5.
Boyle
, P. J.
, Büchner
, A.
, Stone
, M. A.
, Lenarz
, T.
, and Moore
, B. C. J.
(2009
). “Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants
,” Int. J. Audiol.
48
(4
), 211
–221
.6.
Bozorg-Grayeli
, A.
, Guevara
, N.
, Bebear
, J.-P.
, Ardoint
, M.
, Saaï
, S.
, Hoen
, M.
, Gnansia
, D.
, Romanet
, P.
, and Lavieille
, J.-P.
(2015
). “Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants
,” Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.
(in press).7.
Büchner
, A.
, Nogueira
, W.
, Edler
, B.
, Battmer
, R.-D.
, and Lenarz
, T.
(2008
). “Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the Nucleus-24 and Freedom cochlear implants
,” Otol. Neurotol.
29
(2
), 189
–192
.8.
Buechner
, A.
, Dyballa
, K.-H.
, Hehrmann
, P.
, Fredelake
, S.
, and Lenarz
, T.
(2014
). “Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: Acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions
,” PloS One
9
(4
), e95542
.9.
Chatterjee
, M.
, and Shannon
, R. V.
(1998
). “Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
, 103
(5
), 2565
–2572
.10.
Chen
, J.
, Baer
, T.
, and Moore
, B.
(2013
). “Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
(5
), 2910
–2920
.11.
Chen
, J.
, Baer
, T.
, and Moore
, B. C. J.
(2012
). “Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(4
), 2987
–2998
.12.
Chistovich
, L. A.
, and Lublinskaya
, V. V.
(1979
). “The ‘center of gravity’ effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli
,” Hear. Res.
1
(3
), 185
–195
.13.
Cohen
, L. T.
(2009
). “Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. Model development at low pulse rates: General model and application to individuals
,” Hear. Res.
248
(1–2
), 15
–30
.14.
Cohen
, L. T.
, Richardson
, L. M.
, Saunders
, E.
, and Cowan
, R. S. C.
(2003
). “Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking
,” Hear. Res.
179
, 72
–87
.15.
Dawson
, P. W.
, Mauger
, S. J.
, and Hersbach
, A. A.
(2011
). “Clinical evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio-based noise reduction in Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients
,” Ear Hear.
32
, 382
–390
.16.
Dorman
, M. F.
, Loizou
, P. C.
, and Fitzke
, F.
(1998
). “The identification of speech in noise by cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing listeners using 6-channel signal processors
,” Ear Hear.
19
(6
), 481
–484
.17.
Finley
, C. C.
, Holden
, T. A.
, Holden
, L. K.
, Whiting
, B. R.
, Chole
, R. A.
, Neely
, G. J.
, Hullar
, T. E.
, and Skinner
, M. W.
(2008
). “Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes
,” Otol. Neurotol.
29
(7
), 920
–928
.18.
Firszt
, J. B.
, Holden
, L. K.
, Skinner
, M. W.
, Tobey
, E. A.
, Peterson
, A.
, Gaggl
, W.
, Runge-Samuelson
C. L.
, and Wackym
, P. A.
(2004
). “Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems
,” Ear Hear.
25
, 375
–387
.19.
Friesen
, L. M.
, Shannon
, R. V.
, Baskent
, D.
, and Wang
, X.
(2001
). “Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(2
), 1150
–1163
.20.
Fu
, Q. J.
(2002
). “Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users
,” Neuroreport.
13
, 1635
–1640
.21.
Goorevich
, M.
, and Batty
, M.
(2005
). “A new real-time research platform for the Nucleus® and Nucleus® Freedom™ cochlear implants
,” in CIAP 2005
, poster presentation.21.
Green
, T.
, Faulkner
, A.
, and Rosen
, S.
(2012
). “Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users
,” Ear Hear.
33
(2
), 221
–230
.22.
Harczos
, T.
, Chilian
, A.
, and Husar
, P.
(2013
). “Making use of auditory models for better mimicking of normal hearing processes with cochlear implants: The SAM coding strategy
,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst.
7
(4
), 414
–425
.23.
Hey
, M.
, Hocke
, T.
, Hedderich
, J.
, and Müller-Deile
, J.
(2014
). “Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: Reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients
,” Int. J. Audiol.
53
(12
), 895
–902
.24.
Hochberg
, I.
, Boothroyd
, A.
, Weiss
, M.
, and Hellman
, S.
(1992
). “Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users
,” Ear Hear.
13
(4
), 263
–71
.25.
Hu
, Y.
, Loizou
, P. C.
, Li
, N.
, and Kasturi
, K.
(2007
). “Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
(4
), EL128
–EL134
.26.
IEEE Subcommittee on Subjective Measurements.
(1969
). “IEEE recommended practices for speech quality measurements
,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust.
17
, 227
–246
.27.
James
, C. J.
, Blamey
, P. J.
, Martin
, L.
, Swanson
, B.
, Just
, Y.
, and Macfarlane
, D.
(2002
). “Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: A preliminary study
,” Ear Hear.
23
(1
), 49S
–58S
.28.
Jorgensen
, S.
, and Dau
, T.
(2011
). “Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(3
), 1475
–1487
.29.
Khing
, P. P.
, Swanson
, B. A.
, and Ambikairajah
, E.
(2013
). “The effect of automatic gain control structure and release time on cochlear implant speech intelligibility
,” PLoS One
8
(11
), e82263
.30.
Kluender
, K. R.
, Coady
, J. A.
, and Kiefte
, M.
(2003
). “Sensitivity to change in perception of speech
,” Speech Commun.
41
(1
), 59
–69
.31.
Kollmeier
, B.
, and Wesselkamp
, M.
(1997
). “Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
(4
), 2412
–2421
.32.
Litvak
, L. M.
, Spahr
, A. J.
, Saoji
, A. A.
, and Fridman
, G. Y.
(2007
). “Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
(2
), 982
–991
.33.
Loizou
, P. C.
, Dorman
, M. F.
, Tu
, Z.
, and Fitzke
, J.
(2000
). “Recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of speak-type cochlear implant signal processors
,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl.
185
, 67
–68
.34.
Loizou
, P. C.
, and Poroy
, O.
(2001
). “Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(3
), 1619
–1627
.35.
Long
, C. J.
, Holden
, T. A.
, McClelland
, G. H.
, Parkinson
, W. S.
, Shelton
, C.
, Kelsall
, D. C.
, and Smith
, Z. M.
(2014
). “Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding
,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
15
(2
), 293
–304
.36.
Mauger
, S. J.
, Dawson
, P. W.
, and Hersbach
, A. A.
(2012
). “Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
, 327
–336
.37.
Meddis
, R.
, O'Mard
, L. P.
, and Lopez-Poveda
, E. A.
(2001
). “A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(6
), 2852
–2861
.38.
Moore
, B. C. J.
(2003
). “Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: Successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms
,” Speech Commun.
41
, 81
–91
.39.
Nelson
, D. A.
, Schmitz
, J. L.
, Donaldson
, G. S.
, Viemeister
, N. F.
, and Javel
, E.
(1996
). “Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
(4
), 2393
–2414
.40.
Nogueira
, W.
, Büchner
, A.
, Lenarz
, T.
, and Edler
, B.
(2005
). “A psychoacoustic ‘NofM’-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants
,” EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process.
2005
(18
), 3044
–3059
.41.
Nogueira
, W.
, Kátai
, A.
, Harczos
, T.
, Klefenz
, F.
, Buechner
, A.
, and Edler
, B.
(2007
). “An auditory model based strategy for cochlear implants
,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.
2007
, 4127
–4130
.42.
Nogueira
, W.
, Lopez
, M.
, Rode
, T.
, Doclo
, S.
, and Buechner
, A.
(2015
). “Individualizing a monaural beamformer for cochlear implant users
,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
, April 19–24, pp. 5738
–5742
.43.
Oxenham
, A. J.
, Simonson
, A. M.
, Turicchia
, L.
, and Sarpeshkar
, R.
(2007
). “Evaluation of companding-based spectral enhancement using simulated cochlear-implant processing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
(3
), 1709
–1716
.44.
Rhebergen
, K. S.
, Versfeld
, N. J.
, and Dreschler
, W. A.
(2006
). “Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(6
), 3988
–3997
.45.
Sagi
, E.
, Meyer
, T. A.
, Kaiser
, A. R.
, Teoh
, S. W.
, and Svirsky
, M. A.
(2010
). “A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(2
), 1069
–1083
.46.
Sarampalis
, A.
, Kalluri
, S.
, Edwards
, B.
, and Hafter
, E.
(2009
). “Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction
,” J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
52
(5
), 1230
–1240
.47.
Stickney
, G. S.
, Zeng
, F. G.
, Litovsky
, R.
, and Assmann
, P.
(2004
). “Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
(2
), 1081
–1091
.48.
Turicchia
, L.
, and Sarpeshkar
, R.
(2005
). “A bio-inspired companding strategy for spectral enhancement
,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
13
(2
), 243
–253
.© 2016 Acoustical Society of America.
2016
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
