To evaluate the relationship between aircraft noise exposure and the quality of national park visitor experience, more than 4600 visitor surveys were collected at seven backcountry sites in four U.S. national parks simultaneously with calibrated sound level measurements. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate parameters describing the relationship among visitor responses, aircraft noise dose metrics, and mediator variables. For the regression models, survey responses were converted to three dichotomous variables, representing visitors who did or did not experience slightly or more, moderately or more, or very or more annoyance or interference with natural quiet from aircraft noise. Models with the most predictive power included noise dose metrics of sound exposure level, percent time aircraft were audible, and percentage energy due to helicopters and fixed-wing propeller aircraft. These models also included mediator variables: visitor ratings of the “importance of calmness, peace and tranquility,” visitor group composition (adults or both adults and children), first visit to the site, previously taken an air tour, and participation in bird-watching or interpretive talks. The results complement and extend previous research conducted in frontcountry areas and will inform evaluations of air tour noise effects on visitors to national parks and remote wilderness sites.
References
1.
T.
Schultz
, “Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
(6
), 377
–405
(1978
).2.
S.
Fidell
, D. S.
Barber
, and T. J.
Schultz
, “Updating dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 221
–233
(1991
).3.
H.
Miedema
and H.
Vos
, “Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 3432
–3445
(1998
).4.
Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON)
, Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues
(U.S. Department of Defense
, Washington, DC
, 1992
), pp. 2-1
–2-7
.5.
National Parks Overflights Act: Public Law 100-91 (
1987
).6.
G. S.
Anderson
, R. D.
Horonjeff
, C. W.
Menge
, N. P.
Miller
, W. E.
Robert
, D.
Rossano
, G.
Sanchez
, R. M.
Baumgartner
, and C.
McDonald
, “Dose-response relationships derived from data collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks
,” NPOA Report No. 93-6
, Harris Miller Miller and Hanson, Lexington, MA (1993
).7.
G. G.
Fleming
, C. J.
Roof
, A. S.
Rapoza
, D. R.
Read
, J. C.
Webster
, and P. C.
Liebman
, “Development of noise dose/visitor response relationships for the national parks' overflight rule: Bryce Canyon National Park Study
,” Federal Aviation Administration. Report No. FAA-AEE-98-01
, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998
).8.
N. P.
Miller
, G. S.
Anderson
, R. D.
Horonjeff
, R. H.
Thompson
, R. M.
Baumgartner
, and P.
Rathbun
, “Mitigating the effects of military aircraft overflights on recreational users of parks: Final report
,” Harris Miller Miller and Hanson, Burlington, MA (1999
).9.
S.
Fidell
, L.
Silvati
, R.
Howe
, and K. S.
Pearsons
, “Effects of aircraft overflights on wilderness recreationists
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
(5
), 2909
–2918
(1996
).10.
G. S.
Anderson
, A. S.
Rapoza
, G. G.
Fleming
, and N. P.
Miller
, “Aircraft noise dose-response relationships for national parks
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
59
(5
), 519
–540
(2011
).11.
A. S.
Rapoza
, C. S. Y.
Lee
, and J.
Hassol
, “Proceedings of the second workshop on human response to aviation noise in protected natural areas
,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA (2009
). Available online at http://ntlsearch.bts.gov/tris/record/ntl/35897.html (Last viewed 2/26/2015).12.
A. S.
Rapoza
, K. C.
Lewis
, E. A.
Sudderth
, C. S. Y.
Lee
, and J.
Hassol
, Human Response to Aviation Noise Development of Dose-Response Relationships for Backcountry Visitors. Study Methods
(U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
, Cambridge, MA
, 2014
), Vol. I
.13.
A. S.
Rapoza
, K. C.
Lewis
, E. A.
Sudderth
, C. S. Y.
Lee
, and J.
Hassol
, Human Response to Aviation Noise Development of Dose-Response Relationships for Backcountry Visitors. Results and Analyses
(U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
, Cambridge, MA
, 2014
), Vol. II
.14.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4929934 for a summary document containing a representation of the visitor survey instruments.
15.
S.
Lawson
, B.
Kiser
, K.
Hockett
, and A.
Ingram
, Research to Support Backcountry Visitor Use Management and Resource Protection in Halekala National Park: Study Completion Report
(Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, College of Natural Resources
, Blacksburg, VA
, 2008
).16.
Clips are chosen by a computer sampling algorithm with a partially randomized design to minimize bias due to aircraft, aircraft type, selection of clips, or order in which the clips are played.
17.
E.
Pilcher
, P.
Newman
, and R.
Manning
, “Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir Woods National Monument
,” Environ. Manage.
43
, 425
–435
(2009
).18.
B. L.
Mace
, P. A.
Bell
, R. J.
Loomis
, and G. E.
Haas
, “Source attribution of helicopter noise in pristine national park landscapes
,” J. Park Recreat. Admin.
21
(3
), 97
–119
(2003
).19.
B. L.
Mace
, G. C.
Corser
, L.
Zitting
, and J.
Denison
, “Effects of overflights on the national park experience
,” J. Environ. Psychol.
35
, 30
–39
(2013
).20.
J. M.
Fields
, R. G.
DeJong
, T.
Gjestland
, I. H.
Flindell
, R. F. S.
Job
, S.
Kurra
, P.
Lercher
, M.
Vallet
, and T.
Yano
, “Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation
,” J. Sound Vib.
242
, 641
–679
(2001
).21.
ISO/TS 15666:2003, “Acoustics—Assessment of Noise Annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys
” (International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003
).22.
Previous measurements of this type utilized ultra-sensitive short-term monitoring systems with a two-stage windscreen (a 20-in. diameter fabric-covered outer stage with a 3.5-in. diameter foam inner stage) and a 1-in. microphone. It is expected that the two-stage system and the system described perform similarly at wind speeds less than 5 m/s. Data at wind speeds greater than 5 m/s were eliminated in both studies (see Ref. 23).
23.
A. S.
Rapoza
, J. M.
MacDonald
, A.
Hastings
, C.
Scarpone
, C. S. Y.
Lee
, and G. G.
Fleming
, “Development of improved ambient computation methods in support of the National Parks Air Tour Management Act
,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, 2008
), pp. 79
–81
. Available online at http://ntlsearch.bts.gov/tris/record/ntl/37847.html (Last viewed 2/26/2015).24.
S.
Ambrose
and C.
Florian
, Acoustic Measurements in Arches National Park, Canyonlands National Park, Hovenweep National Monument, and Natural Bridges National Monument, 2000–2007
(Sandhill
, Castle Valley, UT
, 2009
), p. 62
.25.
S.
Ambrose
, Sound Levels in the Primary Vegetation Types in Grand Canyon National Park, July 2005
(Sandhill
, Castle Valley, UT
, 2006
), p. 62
.26.
Position information for respondents without a tracking device (approximately 30% of total) was estimated from average hike times of similar visits and noted destination and start time.
27.
ANSI S1.1-1994
, Acoustical Terminology
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
, 1994
).28.
S.
Fidell
, S.
Teffeteller
, R.
Horonjeff
, and D. M.
Green
, “Predicting annoyance from detectability of low-level sounds
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
(5
), 1427
–1434
(1979
).29.
N. P.
Miller
, G. S.
Anderson
, R. D.
Horonjeff
, C. W.
Menge
, J. C.
Ross
, and M.
Newmark
, “Aircraft noise model validation study
,” HMMH Report No. 295860.29
, Harris Miller Miller and Hanson, Burlington MA (2003
), pp. 167
–179
.30.
N. H.
Reddingius
, “User's Manual for the National Park Service Overflight Decision Support System
,” BBN Report No. 7984
, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver CO (1994
), pp. 95
–97
.31.
References to shortened response and mediator variable names are noted in italics throughout this paper.
32.
Those respondents who received an aircraft noise exposure dose but indicated they did not hear aircraft were coded as “not at all” annoyed or experiencing interference. In addition, HR2 survey responses on the positive or pleasing aspect of the nine-point response scale were coded as “not at all” annoyed.
33.
A.
Gelman
and J.
Hill
, Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
(Cambridge University Press
, New York
, 2007
), pp. 301
–324
.34.
H.
Akaike
, “A new look at the statistical model identification
,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control
19
, 716
–723
(1974
).35.
Note that survey type is a categorical variable with three values (AC, HR1, or HR2). During regression analysis, the AC survey is the reference and coefficients are estimated for the HR1 and HR2 survey types.
36.
These mediators are included as they were previously found to strongly influence visitor response to a given dose.
37.
Relative probability = exp[(AICmin-AICi)/2].
38.
Alternate model selection procedures and criteria may be used and may lead to different results.
39.
G.
Moors
, N.
Kieruj
, and J.
Vermunt
, “The effect of labeling and numbering of response scales on the likelihood of response bias
,” Sociol. Method.
44
(1
), 369
–399
(2014
).40.
E.
Wetzel
, C. H.
Carstensen
, and J. R.
Bohnke
, “Consistency of extreme response style and non-extreme response style across traits
,” J. Res. Personal.
47
(2
), 178
–189
(2013
).41.
D. S.
Tull
and D.
Hawkins
I, Marketing Research: Measurement and Method
(Macmillan
, New York
, 1993
).42.
To most accurately represent the data collected, a linear relationship was used between %TAud and LAE (slope1, intercept = −40), while logistic relationship was utilized for PEn's to constrain the percent energy between 0% and 100% (PEnHelos slope at midpoint = 0.27, midpoint = −20, PEnProps slope at midpoint = −0.06, midpoint = 3.7).
43.
M. A.
Tarrant
, G. E.
Haas
, and M. J.
Manfredo
, “Factors affecting visitor evaluations of aircraft overflights of wilderness areas
,” Soc. Nat. Resources
8
(4
), 351
–360
(1995
).2015
U.S. Government
You do not currently have access to this content.