A model, combining acoustical radiosity and the image source method, including phase shifts on reflection, has been developed. The model is denoted Phased Acoustical Radiosity and Image Source Method (PARISM), and it has been developed in order to be able to model both specular and diffuse reflections with complex-valued and angle-dependent boundary conditions. This paper mainly describes the combination of the two models and the implementation of the angle-dependent boundary conditions. It furthermore describes how a pressure impulse response is obtained from the energy-based acoustical radiosity by regarding the model as being stochastic. Three methods of implementation are proposed and investigated, and finally, recommendations are made for their use. Validation of the image source method is done by comparison with finite element simulations of a rectangular room with a porous absorber ceiling. Results from the full model are compared with results from other simulation tools and with measurements. The comparisons of the full model are done for real-valued and angle-independent surface properties. The proposed model agrees well with both the measured results and the alternative theories, and furthermore shows a more realistic spatial variation than energy-based methods due to the fact that interference is considered.

1.
K. H.
Kuttruff
and
M. R.
Schroeder
, “
On frequency response curves in rooms. Comparison of experimental, theoretical and Monte Carlo results for the average frequency spacing between maxima
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
,
76
80
(
1962
).
2.
B.
Yousefzadeh
and
M.
Hodgson
, “
Energy- and wave-based beam tracing prediction of room-acoustical parameters using different boundary conditions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
1450
1461
(
2012
).
3.
C.-H.
Jeong
, “
Absorption and impedance boundary conditions for phased geometrical-acoustics methods
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
2347
2358
(
2012
).
4.
E.
Nilsson
, “
Decay processes in rooms with non-diffuse sound fields—Part I: Ceiling treatment with absorbing material
,”
Build. Acoust.
11
,
39
60
(
2004
).
5.
C.-H.
Jeong
, “
Guideline for adopting the local reaction assumption for porous absorbers in terms of random incidence absorption coefficients
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
97
,
779
790
(
2011
).
6.
K.
Gunnarsdóttir
,
C.-H.
Jeong
, and
G.
Marbjerg
, “
Acoustic behavior of porous ceiling absorbers based on local and extended reaction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
137
,
509
512
(
2015
).
7.
E.
Nilsson
, “
Decay processes in rooms with non-diffuse sound fields. Part II: Effect of irregularities
,”
Build. Acoust.
11
,
133
143
(
2004
).
8.
G. I.
Koutsouris
,
J.
Brunskog
,
C.-H.
Jeong
, and
F.
Jacobsen
, “
Combination of acoustical radiosity and the image source method
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
,
3963
3974
(
2013
).
9.
J.
Borish
, “
Extension of the image model to arbitrary polyhedra
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
75
,
1827
1836
(
1984
).
10.
A.
Le Bot
, “
Derivation of statistical energy analysis from radiative exchanges
,”
J. Sound Vib.
300
,
763
779
(
2007
).
11.
J. B.
Allen
and
D. A.
Berkley
, “
Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
65
,
943
950
(
1979
).
12.
F.
Jacobsen
and
P. M.
Juhl
,
Fundamentals of General Linear Acoustics
(
Wiley
,
West Sussex
,
2013
), pp. 147 and
127
153
.
13.
F. P.
Mechel
, “
Improved mirror source method in room acoustics
,”
J. Sound Vib.
256
,
873
940
(
2002
).
14.
M.
Aretz
,
P.
Dietrich
, and
M.
Vorländer
, “
Application of the mirror source method for low frequency sound prediction in rectangular rooms
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
100
,
306
319
(
2014
).
15.
J. S.
Suh
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
Measurement of transient response of rooms and comparison with geometrical acoustic models
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2304
2317
(
1999
).
16.
H.
Kuttruff
,
Room Acoustics
, 5th ed. (
Spon Press
,
London and New York
,
2009
), pp.
148
149
.
17.
R. N.
Miles
, “
Sound field in a rectangular enclosure with diffusely reflecting boundaries
,”
J. Sound Vib.
92
,
203
226
(
1984
).
18.
E.-M.
Nosal
,
M.
Hodgson
, and
I.
Ashdown
, “
Improved algorithms and methods for room sound-field prediction by acoustical radiosity in arbitrary polyhedral rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
970
980
(
2004
).
19.
A.
Le Bot
and
A.
Bocquillet
, “
Comparison of an integral equation on energy and the ray-tracing technique in room acoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1732
1740
(
2000
).
20.
D. S.
Sivia
and
J.
Skilling
,
Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial
(
Oxford Science Publications
,
Oxford
,
2006
),
118
p.
21.
B.-I.
Dalenbäck
,
M.
Kleiner
, and
P.
Svensson
, “
A macroscopic view of diffuse reflection
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
42
,
793
807
(
1993
).
22.
ISO 3382-1, “
Measurement of room acoustic parameters—Part 1: Performance spaces
” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland,
2009
).
23.
Y.
Miki
, “
Acoustical properties of porous materials—modifications of Delany-Bazley
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
11
,
19
24
(
1990
).
24.
C.-H.
Jeong
and
J.-G.
Ih
, “
Effects of source and receiver locations in predicting room transfer functions by a phased beam tracing method
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
3864
3875
(
2012
).
25.
I.
Bork
, “
Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulations—part I: Measurements
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
91
,
740
752
(
2005
).
26.
I.
Bork
, “
Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulations—part II: Calculations
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
91
,
753
763
(
2005
).
You do not currently have access to this content.