This study investigated whether unattended speech is processed at a semantic level in dichotic listening using a semantic priming paradigm. A lexical decision task was administered in which target words were presented in the attended auditory channel, preceded by two prime words presented simultaneously in the attended and unattended channels, respectively. Both attended and unattended primes were either semantically related or unrelated to the attended targets. Attended prime–target pairs were presented in isolation, whereas unattended primes were presented in the context of a series of rapidly presented words. The fundamental frequency of the attended stimuli was increased by 40 Hz relative to the unattended stimuli, and the unattended stimuli were attenuated by 12 dB [+12 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] or presented at the same intensity level as the attended stimuli (0 dB SNR). The results revealed robust semantic priming of attended targets by attended primes at both the +12 and 0 dB SNRs. However, semantic priming by unattended primes emerged only at the 0 dB SNR. These findings suggest that the semantic processing of unattended speech in dichotic listening depends critically on the relative intensities of the attended and competing signals.

1.
Aydelott
,
J.
,
Baer-Henney
,
D.
,
Trzaskowski
,
M.
,
Leech
,
R.
, and
Dick
,
F.
(
2012
). “
Sentence comprehension in competing speech: Dichotic sentence-word priming reveals hemispheric differences in auditory semantic processing
,”
Lang. Cognitive Proc.
27
,
1108
1134
.
2.
Bentin
,
S.
,
Kutas
,
M.
, and
Hillyard
,
S. A.
(
1995
). “
Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
21
(
1
),
54
67
.
3.
Bloch
,
M. I.
, and
Hellige
,
J. B.
(
1989
). “
Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening
,”
Brain Cognit.
9
(
1
),
136
148
.
4.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2010
). “
Praat: Doing phonetics by computer
” [Computer program]. Version 5.1.45, retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
5.
Boulenger
,
V.
,
Hoen
,
M.
,
Ferragne
,
E.
,
Pellegrino
,
F.
, and
Meunier
,
F.
(
2010
). “
Real-time lexical competitions during speech-in-speech comprehension
,”
Speech Commun.
52
(
3
),
246
253
.
6.
Broadbent
,
D. E.
(
1958
).
Perception and Communication
(
Pergamon Press
,
London, UK
).
7.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
(
2000
). “
The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions
,”
Acta Acust. united Ac.
86
,
117
128
.
8.
Cherry
,
E. C.
(
1953
). “
Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
25
(
5
),
975
979
.
9.
Coltheart
,
M.
(
1981
). “
The MRC psycholinguistic database
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
33A
,
495
505
.
10.
Dupoux
,
E.
,
Kouider
,
S.
, and
Mehler
,
J.
(
2003
). “
Lexical access without attention? Explorations using dichotic priming
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
29
(
1
),
172
183
.
11.
Fritz
,
C. O.
,
Morris
,
P. E.
, and
Richler
,
J. J.
(
2012
). “
Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.
141
(
1
),
2
18
.
12.
Garcia Lecumberri
,
M. L.
, and
Cooke
,
M.
(
2006
). “
Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
(
4
),
2445
2454
.
13.
Grainger
,
J.
, and
Holcomb
,
P.
(
2014
). “
An ERP investigation of dichotic repetition priming with temporally overlapping stimuli
,”
Psychonomic Bull. Rev.
22
(
1
),
289
296
.
14.
Gray
,
J. A.
, and
Wedderburn
,
A. A. I.
(
1960
). “
Grouping strategies with simultaneous stimuli
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
12
,
180
184
.
15.
Holender
,
D.
(
1986
). “
Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal
,”
Behav. Brain Sci.
9
,
1
66
.
16.
Hugdahl
,
K.
(
2005
). “
Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain
,”
Eur. Rev.
13
(
S2
),
119
133
.
18.
Hugdahl
,
K.
,
Westerhausen
,
R.
,
Alho
,
K.
,
Medvedev
,
S.
, and
Hämäläinen
,
H.
(
2008
). “
The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening
,”
Neurosci. Lett.
431
,
90
94
.
19.
Hugdahl
,
K.
,
Westerhausen
,
R.
,
Alho
,
K.
,
Medvedev
,
S.
,
Laine
,
M.
, and
Hämäläinen
,
H.
(
2009
). “
Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story
,”
Scan. J. Psychol.
50
(
1
),
11
22
.
21.
Kimura
,
D.
(
1961
). “
Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli
,”
Can. J. Psychol.
15
(
3
),
166
171
.
22.
Kimura
,
D.
(
1967
). “
Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening
,”
Cortex
3
,
163
178
.
23.
Kiss
,
G. R.
,
Armstrong
,
C.
,
Milroy
,
R.
, and
Piper
,
J.
(
1973
). “
An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis
,” in
The Computer and Literary Studies
, edited by
A. J.
Aitken
,
R. W.
Bailey
, and
N.
Hamilton-Smith
(
Edinburgh University Press
,
Edinburgh, UK
), pp.
153
165
.
24.
Lachter
,
J.
,
Forster
,
K. I.
, and
Ruthruff
,
E.
(
2004
). “
Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention
,”
Psychol. Rev.
111
(
4
),
880
913
.
25.
Lakens
,
D.
(
2013
). “
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs
,”
Front. Psychol.
4
,
863
.
26.
Mackay
,
D. G.
(
1973
). “
Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
25
,
22
40
.
27.
McNamara
,
T. P.
(
2005
). “
Methodological issues
,” in
Semantic Priming: Perspectives From Memory and Word Recognition
(
Psychology Press
,
Hove, UK
), pp.
44
54
.
28.
Moray
,
N.
(
1959
). “
Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
11
(
1
),
56
60
.
29.
Plomp
,
R.
(
1977
). “
Acoustical aspects of cocktail parties
,”
Acustica
38
,
186
191
.
30.
Ratcliff
,
R.
(
1993
). “
Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers
,”
Psychol. Bull.
114
(
3
),
510
532
.
31.
Rivenez
,
M.
,
Darwin
,
C. J.
,
Bourgeon
,
L.
, and
Guillaume
,
A.
(
2007
). “
Unattended speech processing: Effect of vocal tract length
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
EL90
EL95
.
32.
Rivenez
,
M.
,
Darwin
,
C. J.
, and
Guillaume
,
A.
(
2006
). “
Processing unattended speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
4027
4040
.
33.
Rivenez
,
M.
,
Guillaume
,
A.
,
Bourgeon
,
L.
, and
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
2008
). “
Effect of voice characteristics on the attended and unattended processing of two concurrent messages
,”
Eur. J. Cognit. Psychol.
20
(
6
),
967
993
.
34.
Schneider
,
B. A.
,
Li
,
L.
, and
Daneman
,
M.
(
2007
). “
How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
18
,
559
572
.
35.
Simpson
,
S. A.
, and
Cooke
,
M.
(
2005
). “
Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
(
5
),
2775
2778
.
36.
Treisman
,
A. M.
(
1960
). “
Contextual cues in selective listening
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
12
,
242
248
.
37.
Treisman
,
A. M.
, and
Riley
,
J. G. A.
(
1969
). “
Is selective attention selective perception or selective response? A further test
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
79
,
27
34
.
38.
Van Engen
,
K. J.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2007
). “
Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
(
1
),
519
526
.
39.
Van Heuven
,
W. J. B.
,
Mandera
,
P.
,
Keuleers
,
E.
, and
Brysbaert
,
M.
(
2014
). “
SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
67
(
6
),
1176
1190
.
40.
Westerhausen
,
R.
,
Moosmann
,
M.
,
Alho
,
K.
,
Medvedev
,
S.
,
Hämäläinen
,
H.
, and
Hugdahl
,
K.
(
2009
). “
Top–down and bottom–up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage
,”
Brain Res.
1250
,
183
189
.
41.
Wood
,
N. L.
, and
Cowan
,
N.
(
1995a
). “
The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953)
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.
124
(
3
),
243
262
.
42.
Wood
,
N. L.
, and
Cowan
,
N.
(
1995b
). “
The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cognit.
21
,
255
260
.
You do not currently have access to this content.