Technical sounds often contain several tonal components, forming a multi-tone sound. The present study investigates the perception of multi-tone sounds consisting of two harmonic complexes with different fundamental frequencies and combination tones with frequencies that are equal to the sum of multiple integers of the two fundamentals. The experimental parameter is the ratio between the two fundamental frequencies . A total of 15 synthetic multi-tone sounds are rated by 37 participants. In the first experiment, the perceptual space is assessed based on 16 adjective scales using categorical scaling. The resulting perceptual space has the four dimensions (i) pleasant, (ii) power, (iii) temporal structure, and (iv) spectral content of the sounds. In the second experiment, the pleasantness is measured with a paired comparison test. The data consistently show that sounds based on ratios of small integers (e.g., ) are significantly less pleasant than sounds with ratios based on large integers which were constructed by a slight detuning from a ratio of small integers. The repetition rate derived from an autocorrelation analysis of the stimuli turns out to be a good predictor of the (un-)pleasantness sensation.
References
1.
L. H.
Bell
and D. H.
Bell
, Industrial Noise Control Fundamentals and Applications
, 2nd ed. (Marcel Dekker, Inc.
, New York
, 1993
), pp. 67
–73
.2.
S. C.
Fingerhuth
, “Tonalness and consonance of technical sounds
,” Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Institut für Technische Akustik
, Logos Verlag, Berlin
, 2010
, pp. 1
–138
.3.
K. D.
Kryter
and K. S.
Pearsons
, “Judged noisiness of a band of random noise containing an audible pure tone
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
38
, 106
–112
(1965
).4.
R. P.
Hellman
, “Loudness, annoyance, and noisiness produced by single-tone-noise complexes
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
, 62
–73
(1982
).5.
E.
Parizet
and S.
Fingerhuth
, “Subjective evaluation of tonalness and relation between tonalness and unpleasantness
,” in Proceedings Internoise 2009
, Ottawa, Canada (INCE USA
, Washington
, 2009
), pp. 1
–8
.6.
Y.
Suzuki
, S.
Kono
, and T.
Sone
, “An experimental consideration of the evaluation of environmental noise with tonal components
,” J. Sound Vib.
127
, 475
–484
(1988
).7.
R.
Plomp
, “Timbre as a multidimensional attribute of complex tones
,” in Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing
, edited by R.
Plomp
and G. F.
Smoorenburg
(Sijthoff
, Leiden
, 1970
), pp. 397
–414
.8.
ANSI S1.1-1994, Acoustical terminology (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1994).
9.
C.
Krumhansl
, “Why is musical timbre so hard to understand?
,” in Structure and Perception of Electroacoustic Sound and Music
, Vol. 9
, edited by S.
Nielzen
and O.
Olsson
(Elsevier
, Amsterdam
, 1989
), pp. 43
–53
.10.
S.
McAdams
, “2–Musical timbre perception
,” in The Psychology of Music
, 3rd ed., edited by D.
Deutsch
(Academic Press
, New York
, 2013
), pp. 35
–67
.11.
O.
Lartillot
and P.
Toiviainen
, “A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio
,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects
, 2007
, pp. 1
–8
.12.
A.
Caclin
, S.
McAdams
, B. K.
Smith
, and S.
Winsberg
, “Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 471
–482
(2005
).13.
T. M.
Elliott
, L. S.
Hamilton
, and F. E.
Theunissen
, “Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, 389
–404
(2013
).14.
S.
McAdams
, S.
Winsberg
, S.
Donnadieu
, G.
De Soete
, and J.
Krimphoff
, “Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes
,” Psychol. Res.
58
, 177
–192
(1995
).15.
P.
Susini
, G.
Lemaitre
, and S.
McAdams
, “Psychological measurement for sound description and evaluation
,” in Measurement with Persons: Theory, Methods, and Implementation Areas
, edited by B.
Berglund
, G. B.
Rossi
, J. T.
Townsend
, and L. R.
Pendrill
(Psychology Press
, New York
, 2011
), Chap. 11, pp. 227
–253
.16.
C.
Osgood
, G.
Suci
, and P.
Tannenbaum
, The Measurement of Meaning
(University of Illinois Press
, Champaign, IL
, 1957
), pp. 1
–342
.17.
J. S.
Kerrick
, D. C.
Nagel
, and R. L.
Bennett
, “Multiple ratings of sound stimuli
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
45
, 1014
–1017
(1969
).18.
S.
Namba
, S.
Kuwano
, K.
Kinoshita
, and K.
Kurakata
, “Loudness and timbre of broad-band noise mixed with frequency-modulated sounds
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
13
, 49
–58
(1992
).19.
S.
Kuwano
, S.
Namba
, K.
Kurakata
, and Y.
Kikuchi
, “Evaluation of broad-band noise mixed with amplitude-modulated sounds
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
15
, 131
–142
(1994
).20.
H.
Hansen
and R.
Weber
, “Semantic evaluations of noise with tonal components in Japan, France, and Germany: A cross-cultural comparison
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 850
–862
(2009
).21.
A.
Sköld
, D.
Västfjäll
, and M.
Kleiner
, “Perceived sound character and objective properties of powertrain noise in car compartments
,” Acta Acust. united Ac.
91
, 349
–355
(2005
).22.
W. H.
Lichte
, “Attributes of complex tones
,” J. Exp. Psychol.
28
, 455
–480
(1941
).23.
G.
von Bismarck
, “Timbre of steady sounds: A factorial investigation of its verbal attributes
,” Acustica
30
, 146
–159
(1974
).24.
K.
Benedini
, “Klangfarbenunterschied zwischen tiefpaßgefilterten harmonischen Klängen” (“Timbre differences between lowpass-filtered harmonic complex tones”)
, Acustica
44
, 129
–134
(1980
).25.
K.
Benedini
, “Messung der Klangfarbenunterschiede zwischen schmalbandigen harmonischen Klängen” (“Measurement of timbre differences between complex tones”)
, Acustica
44
, 188
–193
(1980
).26.
H.
von Helmholtz
, Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music)
, 5th ed. (Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn
, Braunschweig
, 1896
), pp. 1
–675
.27.
J.
van de Geer
, W.
Levelt
, and R.
Plomp
, “The connotation of musical consonance
,” Acta Psychol.
20
, 308
–319
(1962
).28.
R.
Plomp
and W. J. M.
Levelt
, “Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
38
, 548
–560
(1965
).29.
E.
Terhardt
, “Pitch, consonance, and harmony
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
55
, 1061
–1069
(1974
).30.
A.
Kameoka
and M.
Kuriyagawa
, “Consonance theory part i: Consonance of dyads
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
45
, 1451
–1459
(1969
).31.
R.
Plomp
, “Beats of mistuned consonances
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
42
, 462
–474
(1967
).32.
E.
Zwicker
and H.
Fastl
, Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models
, 3rd ed. (Springer
, Berlin/Heidelberg
, 2007
), pp. 247
–261
.33.
A.
Kameoka
and M.
Kuriyagawa
, “Consonance theory Part II: Consonance of complex tones and its calculation method
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
45
, 1460
–1469
(1969
).34.
A.
Miskiewicz
, T.
Rogala
, and J.
Szepanska-Antosik
, “Perceived roughness of two simultaneous harmonic complex tones
,” Archives Acoust.
32
, 737
–748
(2007
).35.
H.
Fletcher
, E. D.
Blackham
, and R.
Stratton
, “Quality of piano tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
, 749
–761
(1962
).36.
H.
Fletcher
, E. D.
Blackham
, and D. A.
Christensen
, “Quality of organ tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
, 314
–325
(1963
).37.
E. A.
Björk
, “The perceived quality of natural sounds
,” Acta Acust. united Ac.
57
, 185
–190
(1985
).38.
R. T.
Beyer
, Nonlinear Acoustics
(Acoustical Society of America Publishing
, Sewickley, PA
, 1997
), pp. 1
–452
, originally published 1974.39.
R. T.
Schumacher
, “Ab initio calculations of the oscillations of a clarinet
,” Acustica
48
, 71
–85
(1981
).40.
D. H.
Keefe
and B.
Laden
, “Correlation dimension of woodwind multiphonic tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
, 1754
–1765
(1991
).41.
E.
Parizet
, N.
Hamzaoui
, and G.
Sabatie
, “Comparison of some listening test methods: A case study
,” Acta Acust. united Ac.
91
, 356
–364
(2005
).42.
R.
Plomp
and H. J. M.
Steeneken
, “Effect of phase on the timbre of complex tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
, 409
–421
(1969
).43.
S.
Töpken
, J. L.
Verhey
, and R.
Weber
, “Psychoakustische Bewertung von superponierten Tonkomplexen” (“Psychoacoustic evaluation of superimposed complex tones”)
, in Fortschritte der Akustik—DAGA2010, Berlin, Germany
(DEGA e.V.
, Berlin
, 2010
), pp. 589
–590
.44.
E.
Parizet
, “Comparison of two semantic differential test methods
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 1189
–1189
(1999
).45.
H. F.
Kaiser
and J.
Rice
, “Little jiffy, mark iv
,” Educ. Psychol. Meas.
34
, 111
–117
(1974
).46.
M. G.
Kendall
and B. B.
Smith
, “On the method of paired comparisons
,” Biometrika
31
, 324
–345
(1940
).47.
R. T.
Ross
, “Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparison
,” J. Ed. Psychol.
25
, 375
–382
(1934
).48.
M.
Kendall
and J. D.
Gibbons
, Rank Correlation Methods
, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press
, New York
, 1990
), pp. 184
–194
.49.
J.
You
and J. Y.
Jeon
, “Just noticeable differences of sound quality metrics of refrigerator noise
,” in Proceedings of the 19th ICA
, Madrid, Sociedad Española de Acústica (2007
), pp. 1
–5
.50.
F.
Pedrielli
, E.
Carletti
, and C.
Casazza
, “Just noticeable differences of loudness and sharpness for earth moving machines
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 3164
–3164
(2008
) and Proc. Acoustics'08, ASA/EAA/SFA joint meeting, Paris (Société Française d'Acoustique, SFA, 2008).51.
Calculations are carried out by commercial software, HEAD acoustics ArtemiS 11.
52.
The repetition rate describes the overall repetition rate of the time signal which can also be found as the lowest component in the modulation spectrum of the signal. Other audible modulations at higher modulation frequencies can also occur for this type of signals.
53.
Note that the adjective pleasant–unpleasant is loading positively to the pleasant factor, meaning that low factor values are associated to pleasantness and high factor values to unpleasantness.
54.
J. M.
Geary
, “Consonance and dissonance of pairs of inharmonic sounds
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 1785
–1789
(1980
).55.
W. A.
Sethares
, “Local consonance and the relationship between timbre and scale
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 1218
–1228
(1993
).56.
J. B.
Tufts
, M. R.
Molis
, and M. R.
Leek
, “Perception of dissonance by people with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 955
–967
(2005
).57.
R. M.
Warren
and J. A.
Bashford
, “Perception of acoustic iterance: Pitch and infrapitch
,” Percept. Psychophys.
29
, 395
–402
(1981
).58.
K.
Hiramatsu
, K.
Takagi
, and T.
Yamamoto
, “Experimental investigation on the effect of some temporal factors of nonsteady noise on annoyance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
, 1782
–1793
(1983
).© 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
2015
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
