The smearing effects of room reverberation can significantly impair the ability of cochlear implant (CI) listeners to understand speech. To ameliorate the effects of reverberation, current dereverberation algorithms focus on recovering the direct sound from the reverberated signal by inverse filtering the reverberation process. This contribution describes and evaluates a spectral subtraction (SS) strategy capable of suppressing late reflections. Late reflections are the most detrimental to speech intelligibility by CI listeners as reverberation increases. By tackling only the late part of reflections, it is shown that users of CI devices can benefit from the proposed strategy even in highly reverberant rooms. The proposed strategy is also compared against an ideal reverberant (binary) masking approach. Speech intelligibility results indicate that the proposed SS solution is able to suppress additive reverberant energy to a degree comparable to that achieved by an ideal binary mask. The added advantage is that the SS strategy proposed in this work can allow for a potentially real-time implementation in clinical CI processors.
References
1.
Assmann
, P. F.
, and Summerfield
, Q.
(2004
). “The perception of speech under adverse acoustic conditions
,” in Speech Processing in the Auditory System
, edited by S.
Greenberg
, W. A.
Ainsworth
, A. N.
Popper
, and R. R.
Fay
(Springer
, New York)
, pp. 231
–308
.2.
Barron
, M.
, and Marshall
, A. H.
(1981
). “Spatial impression due to early lateral reflections in concert halls: The derivation of a physical measure
,” J. Sound. Vib.
77
, 211
–232
.3.
Berouti
, M.
, Schwartz
, R.
, and Makhoul
, J.
(1979
). “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise
,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
, Vol. 4
, pp. 208
–211
.4.
Boll
, S. F.
(1979
). “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction
,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process.
27
, 113
–120
.5.
Bolt
, R. H.
, and MacDonald
, A. D.
(1949
). “Theory of speech masking by reverberation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
21
, 577
–580
.6.
Bradley
, J. S.
, Sato
, H.
, and Picard
, M.
(2003
). “On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 3233
–3244
.8.
Desmond
, J. M.
, Collins
, L. M.
, and Throckmorton
, C. S.
(2014
). “The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
, EL304
–EL310
.9.
Griesinger
, D.
(1997
). “The psychoacoustics of apparent source width, spaciousness and envelopment in performance spaces
,” Acustica
83
, 721
–731
.10.
Habets
, E. A. P.
(2007
). “Single- and multi-microphone speech dereverberation using spectral enhancement
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Technische University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.11.
Hazrati
, O.
, Lee
, J.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2013
). “Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, 1607
–1614
.12.
Hazrati
, O.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2012
). “The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users
,” Int. J. Audiol.
51
, 437
–443
.13.
Hazrati
, O.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2013
). “Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, 4188
–4196
.14.
Hu
, Y.
, and Kokkinakis
, K.
(2014
). “Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
, EL22
–EL28
.15.
Hu
, Y.
, and Loizou
, P.
(2007
). “A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
, 1777
–1786
.18.
IEEE
(1969
). “IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements
,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust.
17
, 225
–246
.20.
Kjellberg
, A.
(2004
). “Effects of reverberation time on the cognitive load in speech communication: Theoretical considerations
,” Noise Health
7
, 11
–21
.21.
Kokkinakis
, K.
, Hazrati
, O.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2011
). “A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
, 3221
–3232
.22.
Kokkinakis
, K.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2009
). “Selective-tap blind dereverberation for two-microphone enhancement of reverberant speech
,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett.
16
, 961
–964
.23.
Kokkinakis
, K.
, and Loizou
, P. C.
(2011
). “The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
, 1099
–1102
.24.
25.
Lebart
, K.
, and Boucher
, J. M.
(2001
). “A new method based on spectral subtraction for speech dereverberation
,” Acta Acust.
87
, 359
–366
.27.
Mason
, M.
, and Kokkinakis
, K.
(2014
). “Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
57
, 1512
–1520
.28.
Nábělek
, A. K.
, and Letowski
, T. R.
(1985
). “Vowel confusions of hearing impaired listeners under reverberant and non-reverberant conditions
,” J. Speech Hear. Disord.
50
, 126
–131
.29.
Nábělek
, A. K.
, and Letowski
, T. R.
(1988
). “Similarities of vowels in non-reverberant and reverberant fields
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
, 1891
–1899
.30.
Nábělek
, A. K.
, Letowski
, T. R.
, and Tucker
, F. M.
(1989
). “Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
, 1259
–1265
.31.
Nábělek
, A. K.
, and Picket
, J. M.
(1974
). “Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
17
, 724
–739
.32.
Neuman
, A. C.
, Wroblewski
, M.
, Hajicek
, J.
, and Rubinstein
, A.
(2010
). “Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults
,” Ear Hear.
31
, 336
–344
.33.
Peterson
, F. E.
, and Lehiste
, I.
(1962
). “Revised CNC lists for auditory tests
,” J. Speech. Hear. Disord.
27
, 62
–70
.34.
Poissant
, S. F.
, Whitmal
, N. A.
III, and Freyman
, R. L.
(2006
). “Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
, 1606
–1615
.35.
Polack
, J. D.
(1988
). “La transmission de l'énergie sonore dnas les salles
” (“The transmission of sound energy in auditoria”), Ph.D. dissertation, Université du Maine, La Mans, France.36.
Rychtarikova
, M.
, Van den Bogaert
, T.
, Vermeir
, G.
, and Wouters
, J.
(2009
). “Binaural sound source localization in real and virtual rooms
,” J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
57
, 205
–220
.37.
Stevens
, K. N.
(2002
). “The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
, 1872
–1891
.38.
Vandali
, A. E.
, Whitford
, L. A.
, Plant
, K. L.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(2000
). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system
,” Ear Hear.
21
, 608
–624
.39.
Whitmal
, N. A.
, and Poissant
, S. F.
(2009
). “Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 2556
–2569
.© 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
2015
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
