The seabed reflection loss (shortly “bottom loss”) is an important quantity for predicting transmission loss in the ocean. A recent passive technique for estimating the bottom loss as a function of frequency and grazing angle exploits marine ambient noise (originating at the surface from breaking waves, wind, and rain) as an acoustic source. Conventional beamforming of the noise field at a vertical line array of hydrophones is a fundamental step in this technique, and the beamformer resolution in grazing angle affects the quality of the estimated bottom loss. Implementation of this technique with short arrays can be hindered by their inherently poor angular resolution. This paper presents a derivation of the bottom reflection coefficient from the ambient-noise spatial coherence function, and a technique based on this derivation for obtaining higher angular resolution bottom-loss estimates. The technique, which exploits the (approximate) spatial stationarity of the ambient-noise spatial coherence function, is demonstrated on both simulated and experimental data.
References
1.
F. B.
Jensen
, W. A.
Kuperman
, M. B.
Porter
, and H.
Schmidt
, “Fundamentals of ocean acoustics
,” in Computational Ocean Acoustics (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing
), 2nd ed. (Springer
, New York
, 2011
), Chap. 1, pp. 38
–50
.2.
R.
Hamson
, “The modelling of ambient noise due to shipping and wind sources in complex environments
,” Appl. Acoust.
51
, 251
–287
(1997
).3.
E. L.
Hamilton
, “Geoacoustic modeling of the sea floor
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
, 1313
–1340
(1980
).4.
E. L.
Hamilton
and R. T.
Bachman
, “Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
, 1891
–1904
(1982
).5.
C. H.
Harrison
and D. G.
Simons
, “Geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise: A simple method
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
, 1377
–1389
(2002
).6.
C. H.
Harrison
, “Sub-bottom profiling using ocean ambient noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
, 1505
–1515
(2004
).7.
J. I.
Arvelo
, “Robustness and constraints of ambient noise inversion
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 679
–686
(2008
).8.
M.
Siderius
and C.
Harrison
, “High-frequency geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise data using short arrays
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
728
, 22
–31
(2004
).9.
J. E.
Quijano
, S. E.
Dosso
, J.
Dettmer
, L. M.
Zurk
, M.
Siderius
, and C. H.
Harrison
, “Bayesian geoacoustic inversion using wind-driven ambient noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
, 2658
–2667
(2012
).10.
M.
Siderius
, L.
Muzi
, C. H.
Harrison
, and P.
Nielsen
, “Synthetic array processing of ocean ambient noise for higher resolution seabed bottom loss estimation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, EL149
–EL155
(2013
).11.
C. H.
Harrison
, “Performance and limitations of spectral factorization for ambient noise sub-bottom profiling
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 2913
–2923
(2005
).12.
C. H.
Harrison
and M.
Siderius
, “Bottom profiling by correlating beam-steered noise sequences
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 1282
–1296
(2008
).13.
M.
Siderius
, C. H.
Harrison
, and M. B.
Porter
, “A passive fathometer technique for imaging seabed layering using ambient noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
, 1315
–1323
(2006
).14.
P.
Gerstoft
, W. S.
Hodgkiss
, M.
Siderius
, C.-F.
Huang
, and C. H.
Harrison
, “Passive fathometer processing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 1297
–1305
(2008
).15.
S. L.
Means
and M.
Siderius
, “Effects of sea-surface conditions on passive fathometry and bottom characterization
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 2234
–2241
(2009
).16.
M.
Siderius
, H.
Song
, P.
Gerstoft
, W. S.
Hodgkiss
, P.
Hursky
, and C.
Harrison
, “Adaptive passive fathometer processing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
, 2193
–2200
(2010
).17.
J.
Traer
, P.
Gerstoft
, and W. S.
Hodgkiss
, “Ocean bottom profiling with ambient noise: A model for the passive fathometer
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
, 1825
–1836
(2011
).18.
D. H.
Johnson
and D. E.
Dudgeon
, “Arrays and apertures
,” in Array Signal Processing Concepts and Techniques
(Prentice-Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 1993
), Chap. 3, pp. 65
, 89.19.
C. H.
Harrison
, “Formulas for ambient noise level and coherence
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
, 2055
–2066
(1996
).20.
C. H.
Harrison
, “Noise directionality for surface sources in range-dependent environments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
, 2655
–2662
(1997
).21.
H.
Schmidt
, OASES Version 3.1 User Guide and Reference Manual
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, MA
, 2004
).22.
W. S.
Liggett
and M. J.
Jacobson
, “Noise covariance and vertical directivity in a deep ocean
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
39
, 280
–288
(1966
).23.
D. R.
Barclay
and M. J.
Buckingham
, “Depth dependence of wind-driven, broadband ambient noise in the Philippine Sea
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
62
–71
(2013
).24.
M. J.
Buckingham
, “A theoretical model of ambient noise in a low-loss, shallow water channel
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 1186
–1192
(1980
).25.
F. B.
Jensen
, W. A.
Kuperman
, M. B.
Porter
, and H.
Schmidt
, “Normal modes
,” in Computational Ocean Acoustics (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing
), 2nd ed. (Springer
, New York
, 2011
), Chap. 5, p. 340
.26.
B. F.
Cron
and C. H.
Sherman
, “Spatial-correlation functions for various noise models
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
, 1732
–1736
(1962
).27.
B. F.
Cron
, “Addendum: Spatial-correlation functions for various noise models
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
38
, 885
(1965
).28.
H.
Cox
, “Spatial correlation in arbitrary noise fields with application to ambient sea noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
54
, 1289
–1301
(1973
).© 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
2015
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.