An acoustic survey of secondary schools in England has been undertaken. Room acoustic parameters and background noise levels were measured in 185 unoccupied spaces in 13 schools to provide information on the typical acoustic environment of secondary schools. The unoccupied acoustic and noise data were correlated with various physical characteristics of the spaces. Room height and the amount of glazing were related to the unoccupied reverberation time and therefore need to be controlled to reduce reverberation to suitable levels for teaching and learning. Further analysis of the unoccupied data showed that the introduction of legislation relating to school acoustics in England and Wales in 2003 approximately doubled the number of school spaces complying with current standards. Noise levels were also measured during 274 lessons to examine typical levels generated during teaching activities in secondary schools and to investigate the influence of acoustic design on working noise levels in the classroom. Comparison of unoccupied and occupied data showed that unoccupied acoustic conditions affect the noise levels occurring during lessons. They were also related to the time spent in disruption to the lessons (e.g., students talking or shouting) and so may also have an impact upon student behavior in the classroom.
References
1.
B.
Shield
, “Acoustic design of schools—a historical review
,” Acoust. Bull.
37
(1
), 36
–44
(2012
).2.
ANSI/ASA
12.60-2010: Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools: Part 1. Permanent Schools
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
, 2010
).3.
Department for Education and Skills
, Building Bulletin 93 Acoustic Design of Schools
(The Stationary Office
, London
, 2003
).4.
AS/NZS
2107:2000: Recommended Design Sound Levels and Reverberation Times for Building Interiors
(Standards Australia, Australia and New Zealand Standard Acoustics
, 2000
).5.
AIJES
S001: Academic Standard and Design Guidelines for Sound Environment in School Buildings
(Architectural Institute of Japan
, Tokyo
, 2008
).6.
SIS SS
25268:2007: Acoustics—Sound Classification Of Spaces In Buildings—Institutional Premises, Rooms For Education, Preschools And Leisure-Time Centres, Rooms for Office Work and Hotels
(Swedish Standards Institute
, Stockholm
, 2007
).7.
“Erhvervs-og Boligstyrelsen. Vejledning om lydforhold i undervisnings-og daginstitutionsbyggeri” (“Guidance on acoustics in teaching and day-care center construction”) (2004). Available at www.ebst.dk/file/1920/vejledning_om_lydforhold_institutioner.pdf (Last viewed 8/26/
2013
).8.
B. M.
Shield
and J. E.
Dockrell
, “External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
(2
), 730
–738
(2004
).9.
A.
Astolfi
and F.
Pellerey
, “Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 163
–173
(2008
).10.
L. M.
Ronsse
and L. M.
Wang
, “Relationships between unoccupied classroom acoustical conditions and elementary student achievement measured in eastern Nebraska
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
, 1480
–1495
(2013
).11.
R.
Hetu
, C.
Truchon-Gagnon
, and S.
Bilodeau
, “Problems of noise in school settings: A review of literature and the results of an exploratory study
,” J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. Audiol.
14
(3
), 31
–38
(1990
).12.
G. W.
Evans
and S. J.
Lepore
, “Nonauditory effects of noise on children: A critical review
,” Child. Environ.
10
(1
), 31
–51
(1993
).13.
B. M.
Shield
and J. E.
Dockrell
, “The effects of noise on children at school: A review
,” in Collected Papers in Building Acoustics: Room Acoustics and Environmental Noise
, edited by B.
Gibbs
, J.
Goodchild
, C.
Hopkins
, and D.
Oldham
(Multi-Science Publishing
, Essex, UK
, 2010
), pp. 159
–182
.14.
S. A.
Stansfeld
, B.
Berglund
, C.
Clark
, I.
Lopez-Barrio
, P.
Fischer
, E.
Öhrström
, M. M.
Haines
, J.
Head
, S.
Hygge
, I.
van Kamp
, and B. F.
Berry
, “Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: A cross-national study
,” Lancet
365
, 1942
–1949
(2005
).15.
M.
Klatte
, J.
Hellbruck
, J.
Seidal
, and P.
Leistner
, “Effects of classroom acoustics on performance and well-being in elementary school children: A field study
,” Environ. Behav.
42
(5
), 659
–692
(2010
).16.
J. E.
Dockrell
and B. M.
Shield
, “Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom
,” Br. Educat. Res. J.
32
(3
), 509
–525
(2006
).17.
B. M.
Shield
and J. E.
Dockrell
, “The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(1
), 133
–144
(2008
).18.
R.
Ljung
, P.
Sörqvist
, and S.
Hygge
, “Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance
,” Noise Health
11
, 194
–198
(2009
).19.
D.
Canning
and A.
James
, The Essex Study–Optimised Classroom Acoustics for All
(Association of Noise Consultants, St. Albans
, Hertfordshire, UK
, 2012
).20.
S.
Hygge
, G.
Evans
, and M.
Bullinger
, “A prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise on cognitive performance in schoolchildren
,” Psychol. Sci.
13
(5
), 469
–474
(2002
).21.
S.
Sanz
, A. M.
Garcia
, and A.
Garcia
, “Road traffic noise around schools: A risk for pupils' performance?
,” Int. Arch. Occupat. Environ. Health
65
, 205
–207
(1993
).22.
J.
Romero
and D.
Lliso
, “Perception and acoustic conditions in secondary Spanish schools
,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics
, Trondheim, Norway
(1995
), pp. 271
–274
.23.
H.
Sato
and J.
Bradley
, “Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(4
), 2064
–2077
(2008
).24.
25.
D.
MacKenzie
, “Noise sources and levels in UK schools
,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Noise Control and Acoustics for Educational Buildings
, Proceedings of the Turkish Acoustical Society, Istanbul (May 2000
), pp. 97
–106
.26.
B.
Hay
, “A pilot study of classroom noise levels and teachers' reactions
,” Voice
4
, 127
–134
(1995
).27.
A.
Moodley
, “Acoustic conditions in mainstream classrooms
,” J. Br. Assoc. Teachers Deaf
13
(2
), 48
–54
(1989
).28.
J.
Bradley
, “Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
(3
), 846
–854
(1986
).29.
M.
Hodgson
, R.
Rempel
, and S.
Kennedy
, “Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
(1
), 226
–233
(1999
).30.
P.
Lundquist
, K.
Holmberg
, and U.
Landstrom
, “Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at school
,” Noise Health
2
, 39
–46
(2000
).31.
Y.
Avsar
and M.
Gonullu
, “The influence of indoor acoustical parameters on student perception in classrooms
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
58
(3
), 310
–318
(2010
).32.
B.
Shield
, E.
Greenland
, and J.
Dockrell
, “Noise in open plan classrooms: A review
,” Noise Health
12
, 225
–234
(2010
).33.
E.
Greenland
and B.
Shield
, “A survey of acoustic conditions in semi-open plan classrooms in the United Kingdom
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(3
), 1399
–1410
(2011
).34.
D.
Connolly
, J.
Dockrell
, B.
Shield
, R.
Conetta
, and T.
Cox
, “Adolescents' perceptions of their school's acoustic environment
,” Noise Health
15
, 269
–280
(2013
).35.
C.
Mydlarz
, R.
Conetta
, D.
Connolly
, T.
Cox
, J.
Dockrell
, and B.
Shield
, “Comparison of environmental and acoustic factors in occupied school classrooms for 11–16 year old students
,” Build. Environ.
60
, 265
–271
(2013
).36.
ISO
3382-2000, Measurement of reverberation time with reference to other room acoustical parameters
(International Standards Organization
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2000
).37.
IEC
60268-16-2011, Sound system equipment. Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index
(International Electrotechnical Commission
, Geneva, Switzerland
, 2011
).38.
J. S.
Bradley
, H.
Sato
, and M.
Picard
, “On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 3233
–3244
(2003
).39.
E. E.
Greenland
, “Acoustics of open plan classrooms in primary schools
,” Ph.D. thesis, London South Bank University
, London, UK
, 2009
.40.
S. P.
Banbury
and D. C.
Berry
, “Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements
,” Ergonomics
48
(1
), 25
–37
(2005
).© 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
2015
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
