Ultrasonic echoes backscattered from diffuse media, recorded by an array transducer and appropriately focused, demonstrate coherence predicted by the van Cittert–Zernike theorem. Additive noise signals from off-axis scattering, reverberation, phase aberration, and electronic (thermal) noise can all superimpose incoherent or partially coherent signals onto the recorded echoes, altering the measured coherence. An expression is derived to describe the effect of uncorrelated random channel noise in terms of the noise-to-signal ratio. Equivalent descriptions are made in the aperture dimension to describe uncorrelated magnitude and phase apodizations of the array. Binary apodization is specifically described as an example of magnitude apodization and adjustments are presented to minimize the artifacts caused by finite signal length. The effects of additive noise are explored in short-lag spatial coherence imaging, an image formation technique that integrates the calculated coherence curve of acquired signals up to a small fraction of the array length for each lateral and axial location. A derivation of the expected contrast as a function of noise-to-signal ratio is provided and validation is performed in simulation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2015
January 01 2015
Equivalence of time and aperture domain additive noise in ultrasound coherence
Nick B. Bottenus;
Nick B. Bottenus
a)
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Duke University
, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregg E. Trahey
Gregg E. Trahey
b)
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Duke University
, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
b)
Also at: Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 132–138 (2015)
Article history
Received:
February 28 2014
Accepted:
November 18 2014
Citation
Nick B. Bottenus, Gregg E. Trahey; Equivalence of time and aperture domain additive noise in ultrasound coherence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2015; 137 (1): 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904530
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Performance study of ray-based ocean acoustic tomography methods for estimating submesoscale variability in the upper ocean
Etienne Ollivier, Richard X. Touret, et al.
Related Content
Angular coherence in ultrasound imaging: Theory and applications
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2017)
Speckle coherence of piecewise-stationary stochastic targets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2019)
Short-lag spatial coherence imaging with multi-line transmission to improve needle visibility in ultrasound images
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2019)
Reverberation suppression and enhanced sensitivity by coherence-based beamforming
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2017)
Comparison of virtual source synthetic aperture beamforming with an element-based model
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2018)