In the real world, listeners often need to track multiple simultaneous sources in order to maintain awareness of the relevant sounds in their environments. Thus, there is reason to believe that simple single source sound localization tasks may not accurately capture the impact that a listening device such as a hearing aid might have on a listener's level of auditory awareness. In this experiment, 10 normal hearing listeners and 20 hearing impaired listeners were tested in a task that required them to identify and localize sound sources in three different listening tasks of increasing complexity: a single-source localization task, where listeners identified and localized a single sound source presented in isolation; an added source task, where listeners identified and localized a source that was added to an existing auditory scene, and a remove source task, where listeners identified and localized a source that was removed from an existing auditory scene. Hearing impaired listeners completed these tasks with and without the use of their previously fit hearing aids. As expected, the results show that performance decreased both with increasing task complexity and with the number of competing sound sources in the acoustic scene. The results also show that the added source task was as sensitive to differences in performance across listening conditions as the standard localization task, but that it correlated with a different pattern of subjective and objective performance measures across listeners. This result suggests that a measure of complex auditory situation awareness such as the one tested here may be a useful tool for evaluating differences in performance across different types of listening devices, such as hearing aids or hearing protection devices.

1.
Best
,
V.
,
Carlile
,
S.
,
Kopčo
,
N.
, and
van Schaik
,
A.
(
2011
). “
Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
5
),
EL210
EL215
.
2.
Best
,
V.
,
van Schaik
,
A.
, and
Carlile
,
S.
(
2004
). “
Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
324
336
.
3.
Brown
,
G. J.
and
Cooke
,
M.
(
1994
). “
Computational auditory scene analysis
,”
Comput. Speech Lang.
8
(
4
),
297
336
.
4.
Brungart
,
D.
and
Simpson
,
B.
(
2007
). “
Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
69
,
79
91
.
5.
Brungart
,
D.
,
Simpson
,
B.
,
Darwin
,
C.
,
Arbogast
,
T.
, and
Kidd
,
G.
(
2005
). “
Across-ear interference from parametrically-degraded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
292
304
.
6.
Constantino
,
F. C.
,
Pinggera
,
L.
,
Paranamana
,
S.
,
Kashino
,
M.
, and
Chait
,
M.
(
2012
). “
Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes
,”
PLoS One
7
(
9
),
e46167
.
7.
Durlach
,
N.
,
Rigoulos
,
A.
,
Pang
,
X.
,
Woods
,
W.
,
Kulkarni
,
A.
,
Colburn
,
H.
, and
Wenzel
,
E.
(
1992
). “
On the externalization of auditory images
,”
Presence
1
,
251
257
.
8.
Eramudugolla
,
R.
,
Irvine
,
D. R.
,
McAnally
,
K. I.
,
Martin
,
R. L.
, and
Mattingley
,
J. B.
(
2005
). “
Directed attention eliminates change deafness in complex auditory scenes
,”
Curr. Biol.
15
(
12
),
1108
1113
.
9.
Gatehouse
,
S.
and
Noble
,
W.
(
2004
). “
The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ)
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
43
(
2
),
85
99
.
10.
Good
,
M. D.
and
Gilkey
,
R. H.
(
1996
). “
Sound localization in noise: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
1108
1117
.
11.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
(
1983
). “
Localization of sound in rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
1380
1391
.
12.
Kidd
,
G.
,
Arbogast
,
T. L.
,
Mason
,
C.
, and
Gallun
,
F.
(
2005
). “
The advantages of knowing where to listen
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
3804
3815
.
13.
Lorenzi
,
C.
,
Gatehouse
,
S.
, and
Lever
,
C.
(
1999
). “
Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
1810
1820
.
14.
Middlebrooks
,
J.
and
Green
,
D.
(
1990
). “
Directional dependence of interaural envelope delays
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
2149
2162
.
15.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Kopco
,
N.
, and
Martin
,
T. J.
(
2005
). “
Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: Binaural room impulse responses
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3100
3115
.
16.
Simpson
,
B. D.
,
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Iyer
,
N.
,
Gilkey
,
R. H.
, and
Hamil
,
J. T.
(
2007
). “
Localization in multiple source environments: Localizing the missing source
,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2007)
, Montreal, CA, June 26–29.
17.
Tillman
,
T. W.
and
Carhart
,
R.
(
1966
). “
An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words: Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6
,” technical report, DTIC document.
18.
Wightman
,
F.
and
Kistler
,
D.
(
1989
). “
Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
868
878
.
You do not currently have access to this content.