The biosonar beampatterns found across different bat species are highly diverse in terms of global and local shape properties such as overall beamwidth or the presence, location, and shape of multiple lobes. It may be hypothesized that some of this variability reflects evolutionary adaptation. To investigate this hypothesis, the present work has searched for patterns in the variability across a set of 283 numerical predictions of emission and reception beampatterns from 88 bat species belonging to four major families (Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae, Phyllostomidae, Vespertilionidae). This was done using a lossy compression of the beampatterns that utilized real spherical harmonics as basis functions. The resulting vector representations showed differences between the families as well as between emission and reception. These differences existed in the means of the power spectra as well as in their distribution. The distributions were characterized in a low dimensional space found through principal component analysis. The distinctiveness of the beampatterns across the groups was corroborated by pairwise classification experiments that yielded correct classification rates between 85% and 98%. Beamwidth was a major factor but not the sole distinguishing feature in these classification experiments. These differences could be seen as an indication of adaptive trends at the beampattern level.

1.
J.
Krause
and
R.
Marhefka
,
Antennas for All Applications
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
2002
).
2.
E.
Wolff
,
Antenna Analysis
, 2nd ed. (
Artech House
,
Boston
,
1988
).
3.
N. H.
Fletcher
,
Acoustic Systems in Biology
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1992
).
4.
L.
Kinsler
,
A.
Frey
,
A.
Coppens
, and
J.
Sanders
,
Fundamentals of Acoustics
, 4th ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
2009
).
5.
M.
Skolnik
,
Introduction to Radar Systems
, 3rd ed. (
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston
,
2003
).
6.
B. V.
Veen
and
K.
Buckley
, “
Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering
,”
IEEE ASSP Mag.
5
,
4
24
(
1988
).
7.
H. V.
Trees
,
Optimum Array Processing
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
2002
).
8.
R.
Müller
,
H.
Lu
, and
J.
Buck
, “
Sound-diffracting flap in the ear of a bat generates spatial information
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
,
108701
(
2008
).
9.
R.
Müller
,
H.
Lu
,
S.
Zhang
, and
H.
Peremans
, “
A helical biosonar scanning pattern in the Chinese Noctule, Nyctalus plancyi
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
4083
4092
(
2006
).
10.
R.
Müller
, “
Numerical analysis of biosonar beamforming mechanisms and strategies in bats
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
1414
1425
(
2010
).
11.
J. E.
Hill
and
J. D.
Smith
,
Bats: A Natural History
, reprint ed. (
University of Texas Press
,
Austin
,
1992
).
12.
G.
Jones
and
E. C.
Teeling
, “
The evolution of echolocation in bats
,”
Trends Ecol. Evol.
21
,
149
156
(
2006
).
13.
C.
Müller
,
Spherical Harmonics, Vol. 17 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1966
).
14.
M.
Kazhdan
,
T.
Funkhouser
, and
S.
Rusinkiewicz
, “
Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors
,” in
Proceedings of the 2003 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Geometry Processing
, Eurographics Association (
2003
), pp.
156
164
.
15.
I.
Jolliffe
,
Principal Component Analysis
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2002
).
16.
N.
Simmons
,
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference
, 3rd ed. (
Johns Hopkins University Press
,
Baltimore
,
2005
), Vol.
1
, Chap. Order Chiroptera, pp.
312
529
.
17.
R.
Müller
, “
A numerical study of the role of the tragus in the big brown bat
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
3701
3712
(
2004
).
18.
Q.
Zhuang
and
R.
Müller
, “
Noseleaf furrows in a horseshoe bat act as resonance cavities shaping the biosonar beam
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
97
,
218701
(
2006
).
19.
A.
Gupta
and
R.
Müller
, “
Effects of the source location on numerical biosonar beampattern predictions for bat noseleaves
,”
Proc. Meetings Acoust.
19
,
010008
(
2013
).
20.
W.
Feller
,
An Introduction to Probability: Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2 of Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics
(
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
1971
).
21.
D.
Hoiem
,
A.
Efros
, and
M.
Hebert
, “
Recovering surface layout from an image
,”
Int. J. Comput. Vis.
75
,
151
172
(
2007
).
22.
D.
Ververidis
and
C.
Kotropoulos
, “
Sequential forward feature selection with low computational cost
,” in
Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference
, Antalya, Turkey (
2005
).
23.
M.
Chung
,
R.
Hartley
,
K.
Dalton
, and
R.
Davidson
, “
Encoding cortical surface by spherical harmonics
,”
Stat. Sin.
18
,
1269
1291
(
2008
).
24.
M.
Chung
, “
Heat kernel smoothing on unit sphere
,” in
3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro
(
2006
), pp.
992
995
.
25.
L.
Jakobsen
,
E.
Kalko
, and
A.
Surlykke
, “
Echolocation beam shape in emballonurid bats, Saccopteryx bilineata and Cormura brevirostris
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
66
,
1493
1502
(
2012
).
26.
L.
Jakobsen
,
J. M.
Ratcliffe
, and
A.
Surlykke
, “
Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats
,”
Nature
493
,
93
96
(
2012
).
You do not currently have access to this content.