This study investigated development of the ability to integrate glimpses of speech in modulated noise. Noise was modulated synchronously across frequency or asynchronously such that when noise below 1300 Hz was “off,” noise above 1300 Hz was “on,” and vice versa. Asynchronous masking was used to examine the ability of listeners to integrate speech glimpses separated across time and frequency. The study used the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test and included adults, older children (age 8–10 yr) and younger children (5–7 yr). Results showed poorer masking release for the children than the adults for synchronous modulation but not for asynchronous modulation. It is possible that children can integrate cues relatively well when all intervals provide at least partial speech information (asynchronous modulation) but less well when some intervals provide little or no information (synchronous modulation). Control conditions indicated that children appeared to derive less benefit than adults from speech cues below 1300 Hz. This frequency effect was supported by supplementary conditions where the noise was unmodulated and the speech was low- or high-pass filtered. Possible sources of the developmental frequency effect include differences in frequency weighting, effective speech bandwidth, and the signal-to-noise ratio in the unmodulated noise condition.

1.
ANSI
(
2010
). S3.6,
Specification for Audiometers
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
2.
Bernstein
,
J. G.
, and
Brungart
,
D. S.
(
2011
). “
Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
473
488
.
3.
Bernstein
,
J. G.
, and
Grant
,
K. W.
(
2009
). “
Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
3358
3372
.
4.
Buss
,
E.
,
Whittle
,
L. N.
,
Grose
,
J. H.
, and
Hall
,
J. W.
(
2009
). “
Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
269
280
.
5.
Cooke
,
M.
(
2006
). “
A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
1562
1573
.
6.
Eisenberg
,
L. S.
,
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Martinez
,
A. S.
,
Wygonski
,
J.
, and
Boothroyd
,
A.
(
2000
). “
Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
2704
2710
.
7.
Elliott
,
L. L.
,
Connors
,
S.
,
Kille
,
E.
,
Levin
,
S.
,
Ball
,
K.
, and
Katz
,
D.
(
1979
). “
Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
12
21
.
8.
Elliott
,
L. L.
, and
Katz
,
D.
(
1980
). “
Development of a new children's test of speech discrimination
,” Technical Manual (St. Louis, MO).
9.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Balakrishnan
,
U.
, and
Helfer
,
K. S.
(
2008
). “
Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1627
1637
.
10.
Hall
,
J. W.
,
Buss
,
E.
,
Grose
,
J. H.
, and
Roush
,
P. A.
(
2012
). “
Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation
,”
Ear Hear.
33
,
340
348
.
11.
Howard-Jones
,
P. A.
, and
Rosen
,
S.
(
1993
). “
Uncomodulated glimpsing in ‘checkerboard’ noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2915
2922
.
12.
Kirk
,
R. E.
(
1968
).
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
(
Wadsworth
,
Belmont, CA
), pp.
179
182
.
13.
Li
,
N.
, and
Loizou
,
P. C.
(
2007
). “
Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
1165
1172
.
14.
McCreery
,
R. W.
, and
Stelmachowicz
,
P. G.
(
2011
). “
Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
4070
4081
.
15.
Mlot
,
S.
,
Buss
,
E.
, and
Hall
,
J. W.
(
2010
). “
Spectral integration and bandwidth effects on speech recognition in school-aged children and adults
,”
Ear Hear.
31
,
56
62
.
16.
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
1996
). “
The relation between speech perception and phonemic awareness: Evidence from low-SES children and children with chronic OM
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
39
,
1059
1070
.
17.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
, and
Simonson
,
A. M.
(
2009
). “
Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
457
468
.
18.
Ross
,
M.
, and
Lerman
,
J.
(
1970
). “
A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
13
,
44
53
.
19.
Smits
,
C.
, and
Festen
,
J. M.
(
2013
). “
The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. II. Fluctuating noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
,
3004
3015
.
20.
Stuart
,
A.
(
2005
). “
Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise
,”
Ear Hear.
26
,
78
88
.
21.
Stuart
,
A.
(
2008
). “
Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
19
,
135
146
.
22.
Stuart
,
A.
,
Givens
,
G. D.
,
Walker
,
L. J.
, and
Elangovan
,
S.
(
2006
). “
Auditory temporal resolution in normal-hearing preschool children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
1946
1949
.
23.
Wroblewski
,
M.
,
Lewis
,
D. E.
,
Valente
,
D. L.
, and
Stelmachowicz
,
P. G.
(
2012
). “
Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults
,”
Ear Hear.
33
,
731
744
.
You do not currently have access to this content.