Studies investigating speech-on-speech masking effects commonly use closed-set speech materials such as the coordinate response measure [Bolia et al. (2000). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065–1066]. However, these studies typically result in very low (i.e., negative) speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) when the competing speech signals are spatially separated. To achieve higher SRTs that correspond more closely to natural communication situations, an open-set, low-context, multi-talker speech corpus was developed. Three sets of 268 unique Danish sentences were created, and each set was recorded with one of three professional female talkers. The intelligibility of each sentence in the presence of speech-shaped noise was measured. For each talker, 200 approximately equally intelligible sentences were then selected and systematically distributed into 10 test lists. Test list homogeneity was assessed in a setup with a frontal target sentence and two concurrent masker sentences at ±50° azimuth. For a group of 16 normal-hearing listeners and a group of 15 elderly (linearly aided) hearing-impaired listeners, overall SRTs of, respectively, +1.3 dB and +6.3 dB target-to-masker ratio were obtained. The new corpus was found to be very sensitive to inter-individual differences and produced consistent results across test lists. The corpus is publicly available.
REFERENCES
1.
Agus
, T. R.
, Akeroyd
, M. A.
, Gatehouse
, S.
, and Warden
, D.
(2009
). “Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 1926
–1940
.2.
Arbogast
, T. L.
, Mason
, C. R.
, and Kidd
, G.
, Jr. (2002
). “The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
, 2086
–2098
.3.
Behrens
, T.
, Neher
, T.
, and Johannesson
, R. B.
(2008
). “Evaluation of a Danish speech corpus for assessment of spatial unmasking
,” in Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
, edited by T.
Dau
, J. M.
Buchholz
, J. M.
Harte
, and T. U.
Christiansen
(Centertryk A/S
, Copenhagen, Denmark
), pp. 449
–457
.4.
Best
, V.
, Marrone
, N.
, Mason
, C. R.
, and Kidd
, G.
, Jr. (2012
). “The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
, 3103
–3110
.5.
Boersma
, P.
, and Weenink
, D.
(2011
). “Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.40) [computer program]
,” http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ (Last viewed June 20, 2011).6.
Bolia
, R. S.
, Nelson
, W. T.
, Ericson
, M. A.
, and Simpson
, B. D.
(2000
). “A speech corpus for multitalker communications research
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 1065
–1066
.7.
Brungart
, D. S.
(2001
). “Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 1101
–1109
.8.
Clopper
, C. G.
, Pisoni
, D. B.
, and Tierney
, A. T.
(2006
). “Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
17
, 331
–349
.9.
10.
Gatehouse
, S.
, and Noble
, W.
(2004
). “The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ)
,” Int. J. Audiol.
43
, 85
–99
.11.
Helfer
, K. S.
, and Freyman
, R. L.
(2009
). “Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 447
–456
.12.
Henrichsen
, P. J.
(2007
). “The Danish PAROLE corpus—A merge of speech and writing
,” in Current Trends in Research on Spoken Language in the Nordic Countries
, edited by J.
Toivanen
and P. J.
Henrichsen
(Oulu University Press
, Oulu
), Vol. II
, pp. 84
–93
.13.
IEC
(1998
). 268-13, Sound System Equipment—Part 13: Listening Tests on Loudspeakers
(International Electrotechnical Commission
, Geneva
).14.
Kalikow
, D. N.
, Stevens
, K. N.
, and Elliot
, L. L.
(1977
). “Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
, 1337
–1351
.15.
Kidd
, G.
, Jr., Arbogast
, T. L.
, Mason
, C. R.
, and Gallun
, F. J.
(2005
). “The advantage of knowing where to listen
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 3804
–3815
.16.
Kidd
, G.
, Jr., Mason
, C. R.
, Deliwala
, P. S.
, Woods
, W. S.
, and Colburn
, H. S.
(1994
). “Reducing informational masking by sound segregation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
, 3475
–3480
.17.
Kitterick
, P. T.
, Bailey
, P. J.
, and Summerfield
, A. Q.
(2010
). “Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
, 2498
–2508
.18.
Lunner
, T.
, Hietkamp
, R. K.
, Andersen
, M. R.
, Hopkins
, K.
, and Moore
, B. C. J.
(2012
). “Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants
,” Ear Hear.
33
, 377
–388
.19.
MacPherson
, A.
(2012
). “The factors affecting the psychometric function for speech intelligibility
,” doctoral dissertation, University of Strathclyde & MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Glasgow, UK
.20.
Marrone
, N.
, Mason
, C. R.
, and Kidd
, G.
, Jr. (2008
). “The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
, 3064
–3075
.21.
McArdle
, R. A.
, and Wilson
, R. H.
(2006
). “Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN™ lists
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
17
, 157
–167
.22.
Middelweerd
, M. J.
, Festen
, J. M.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1990
). “Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram
,” Audiology
29
, 1
–7
.23.
Neher
, T.
, Laugesen
, S.
, Jensen
, N. S.
, and Kragelund
, L.
(2011
). “Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
, 1542
–1558
.24.
Nielsen
, J. B.
, and Dau
, T.
(2009
). “Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test
,” Int. J. Audiol.
48
, 729
–741
.25.
Nielsen
, J. B.
, and Dau
, T.
(2011
). “The Danish hearing in noise test
,” Int. J. Audiol.
50
, 202
–208
.26.
Nilsson
, M.
, Soli
, S. D.
, and Sullivan
, J. A.
(1994
). “Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
, 1085
–1099
.27.
Pearsons
, K. S.
, Bennett
, R. L.
, and Fidell
, S.
(1977
). “Speech levels in various noise environments
,” EPA 600/1-77-025, Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Washington, D.C., cited in Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (1988). “Speech understanding and aging,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 859–895.28.
29.
Plomp
, R.
(1978
). “Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
, 533
–549
.30.
Prosser
, S.
, Turrini
, M.
, and Arslan
, E.
(1991
). “Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly
,” Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl.
476
, 136
–142
.31.
Sommers
, M. S.
, Kirk
, K. I.
, and Pisoni
, D. B.
(1997
). “Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format
,” Ear Hear.
18
, 89
–99
.32.
Sumby
, W. H.
, and Pollack
, I.
(1954
). “Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
, 212
–215
.33.
Wagener
, K.
, Josvassen
, J. L.
, and Ardenkjaer
, R.
(2003
). “Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise
,” Int. J. Audiol.
42
, 10
–17
.© 2014 Acoustical Society of America.
2014
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
