Railway induced vibration is an important source of annoyance among residents living in the vicinity of railways. Annoyance increases with vibration magnitude. However, these correlations between the degree of annoyance and vibration exposure are weak. This suggests that railway vibration induced annoyance is governed by more than just vibration level and therefore other factors may provide information to understand the wide variation in annoyance reactions. Factors coming into play when considering an exposure-response relationship between level of railway vibration and annoyance are presented. The factors investigated were: attitudinal, situational and demographic factors. This was achieved using data from field studies comprised of face-to-face interviews and internal vibration measurements (N = 755). It was found that annoyance scores were strongly influenced by two attitudinal factors: Concern of property damage and expectations about future levels of vibration. Type of residential area and age of the respondent were found to have an important effect on annoyance whereas visibility of the railway and time spent at home showed a significant but small influence. These results indicate that future railway vibration policies and regulations focusing on community impact need to consider additional factors for an optimal assessment of railway effects on residential environments.

1.
Bangjun
,
Z.
,
Lili
,
S.
, and
Guoqing
,
D.
(
2003
). “
The influence of the visibility of the source on the subjective annoyance due to its noise
,”
Appl. Acoust.
64
,
1205
1215
.
2.
Baron
,
R. M.
, and
Kenny
,
D. A.
(
1986
). “
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
,”
J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.
51
,
1173
1182
.
3.
Bradley
,
J. S.
, and
Jonah
,
H.
(
1979
). “
The effects of site selected variables on human response to traffic noise, part I: Type of housing by traffic noise level
,”
J. Sound Vib.
66
,
589
604
.
4.
Brink
,
M.
, and
Wunderli
,
J.-M.
(
2010
). “
A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
2301
2311
.
5.
Cohen
,
S.
(
1978
). “
Environmental load and the allocation of attention
,” in
Advances in Environmental Psychology: Vol. 1. The Urban Environment
, edited by
A.
Baum
,
J. E.
Singer
, and
S.
Valins
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
,
Hillsdale, NJ
), pp.
1
29
.
6.
Condie
,
J.
,
Whittle
,
N.
,
Brown
,
P.
, and
Waddington
,
D.
(
2009
). “
The development of a social survey questionnaire to investigate human response to vibration in residential environments
,” in
Proceedings of Euronoise
(Edinburgh, Scotland), Vol. 23, pp.
971
981
.
7.
Fidell
,
S.
,
Mestre
,
V.
,
Schomer
,
P.
Berry
,
B.
,
Gjestland
,
T.
,
Vallet
,
M.
, and
Reid
,
T.
(
2011
). “
A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
(
2
),
791
806
.
8.
Field
,
A.
(
2009
).
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
, edited by
D. B.
Wright
(
SAGE Publications
,
London
), Chap. 7,
pp
223
.
9.
Fields
,
J.
(
1979
). “
Railway noise and vibration annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Sound Vib.
66
(
3
),
445
458
.
12.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1993
). “
Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2753
2763
.
10.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1998
). “
Reactions to environmental noise in an ambient noise context in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
(
4
),
2245
2260
.
11.
Fields
,
J. M.
,
de Jong
,
R. G.
,
Gjestland
,
T.
,
Flindell
,
I. H.
,
Job
,
R. F. S.
,
Kurra
,
S.
,
Lercher
,
P.
,
Vallet
,
M.
,
Guski
,
R.
,
Felscher-Suhr
,
U.
, and
Schuemer
,
R.
(
2001
). “
Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation
,”
J. Sound Vib.
242
(
4
),
641
679
.
13.
Fields
,
J. M.
, and
Walker
,
J.
(
1982
). “
The response to railway noise in residential areas in Great Britain
,”
J. Sound Vib.
85
(
2
),
177
255
.
14.
Guski
,
R.
(
1999
). “
Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance
,”
J. Noise Health
3
,
45
56
.
15.
Guski
,
R.
(
2001
). “
Community response to environmental noise
,” in
Environmental Urban Noise
, edited by
A.
Garcia
(
WIT Press
,
Southampton
), pp.
111
148
.
16.
Hatfield
,
J.
, and
Job
,
R. F. S.
(
1998
). “
Evidence of optimism bias regarding the health effects of exposure to noise
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem 98
,
Sydney, Australia
, pp.
251
254
.
17.
Heinonen-Guzejev
,
M.
(
2008
). “
Noise sensitivity—Medical, psychological and genetic aspects
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Dep. of Public Health, Univ. of Helsinki
, Finland.
18.
Howarth
,
H. V. C.
(
1989
). “
Annoyance caused by railway vibration and noise in buildings
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Human Factors Research Unit, Univ. of Southampton
, Southampton, UK.
19.
International Organization for Standardization
(
1997
). ISO 2631-1.
Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements
(
International Organization for Standardization Geneva
,
Switzerland
).
20.
International Organization for Standardization
(
2003a
). ISO/TS 15666.
Acoustics – Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-Acoustic Surveys
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
21.
International Organization for Standardization
(
2003b
). ISO 1996-1.
Acoustics – Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise – Part 1: Basic Quantities and Assessment Procedures
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
).
22.
Job
,
R. F. S.
(
1988
). “
Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
991
1001
.
23.
Job
,
R. F. S.
(
1999
). “
Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reactions to noise
,”
J. Noise Health
3
,
57
68
.
24.
Klæboe
,
R.
, and
Fyhri
,
A.
(
1999
). “
People's reactions to vibrations in dwellings from road and rail (summary in English)
,” Report 443 (
Institute of Transport Economic
, Oslo, Norway).
25.
Klæboe
,
R.
,
Engelien
,
E.
, and
Steinnes
,
M.
(
2006
). “
Context sensitive noise impact mapping
,”
Appl. Acoust.
67
(
7
),
620
642
.
26.
Klæboe
,
R.
,
Kolbenstvedt
,
M.
,
Lercher
,
P.
, and
Solberg
,
S.
(
1998
). “
Changes in noise reactions—Evidence for an area effect?
,” in
Proceedings of Internoise 1998
(
Christchurch, New Zealand
), pp.
16
18
.
27.
Klæboe
,
R.
,
Turunen-Rise
,
I. H.
,
Hårvik
,
L.
, and
Madshus
,
C.
(
2003
). “
Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic—Part II: Exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models
,”
Appl. Acoust.
64
(
1
),
89
109
.
28.
Lercher
,
P.
, and
Koffler
,
W. W.
(
1996
). “
Behavioral and health responses associated with road traffic noise exposure along alpine through-traffic routes
,”
Sci. Total Environ.
189/190
,
85
89
.
29.
Miedema
,
H.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1998
). “
Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
(
6
),
3432
3445
.
30.
Miedema
,
H.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1999
). “
Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
3336
3344
.
31.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Oudshoorn
,
C. G. M.
(
2001
). “
Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
(
4
),
409
416
.
32.
Moch-Sibony
,
A.
(
1980
). “
Les effets du bruit sur l'homme” (“The effects of noise on man”)
,
Rev. Acoust.
55
,
251
257
.
33.
Nelson
,
P.
(
1987
).
Transportation Noise. Reference Book
(
Butterworths University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
), Chap. 3.
34.
Nivison
,
M. E.
, and
Endresen
,
I. M.
(
1993
). “
An analysis of relationships among environmental noise, annoyance and sensitivity to noise, and the consequences for health and sleep
,”
J. Behav. Med.
16
(
3
),
257
276
.
35.
Obermeyer
,
P.
(
1983
). “
Interdisziplinäre Feldstudie II über die Besonderheiten des Schienenverkehrslärm gegenüber dem StraBenverkehrslärm; 2 Bände” (“Interdisciplinary field study about the characteristics of railway traffic noise compared to road traffic noise; volume 2”)
, München Forschungs-Nr. 7008/80 (Bundesministerium, Bonn, Germany).
36.
Öhrström
,
E.
, and
Skånberg
,
A. B.
(
1996
). “
A field survey on effects of exposure to noise and vibration from railway traffic, part I: Annoyance and activity disturbance effects
,”
J. Sound Vibr.
193
(
1
),
39
47
.
37.
Paunovic
,
K.
,
Jakovljevic
,
B.
, and
Belojevic
,
G.
(
2009
). “
Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets
,”
Sci. Total Environ.
407
(
12
),
3707
3711
.
38.
Pedersen
,
E.
, and
Larsman
,
P.
(
2008
). “
The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines
,”
J. Environ. Psychol.
28
,
379
839
.
39.
Peris
,
E.
(
2012
), “
Human response to railway vibration in residential environments: Exposure-response relationships and modifying factors
,” Ph.D. thesis,
The Universiy of Salord
, UK, Chap. 5.
40.
Peris
,
E.
,
Woodcock
,
J.
,
Sica
,
G.
,
Moorhouse
,
A.
, and
Waddington
,
D.
(
2012
). “
Annoyance due to railway vibration at different times of the day
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
2
),
191
196
.
41.
Schomer
,
P.
,
Mestre
,
V.
,
Fidell
,
S.
,
Berry
,
B.
,
Gjestland
,
T.
,
Vallet
,
M.
, and
Reid
,
T.
(
2012
). “
Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
4
),
2772
2786
.
42.
Schultz
,
T. J.
(
1978
). “
Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
(
2
),
377
405
.
43.
Sobel
,
M. E.
(
1986
). “
Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models
,”
Sociol. Methodol.
16
,
159
186
.
44.
Stiebel
,
D.
(
2011
). “
Protocol for free field measurements of mitigation effects in the project RIVAS for WP 2, 3,4, 5
,” Report WP1.2 No: SCP0-GA-2010-265754). FP7 framework, Brussels, http://www.rivas-project.eu/fileadmin/documents/rivas_db_wp1_d1_2_v04_measuring_protocol.pdf (Last viewed 1 July 2013).
45.
Vallet
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Annoyance after changes in airport noise environment
,” in
Proceedings InterNoise 96
(Liverpool, England), Vol. 5, pp.
2395
2400
.
46.
Van Gerven
,
P. W. M.
,
Vos
,
H.
,
Van Boxtel
,
M. P. J.
,
Janssen
,
S. A.
, and
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
(
2009
). “
Annoyance from environmental noise across the lifespan
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
187
194
.
47.
Waddington
,
D. C.
,
Woodcock
,
J.
,
Peris
,
E.
,
Condie
,
J.
,
Sica
,
G.
,
Moorhouse
,
A. T.
, and
Steele
,
A.
(
2014
). “
Human response to vibration in residential environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
182
193
.
48.
Woodcock
,
J.
,
Peris
,
E.
,
Condie
,
J.
,
Sica
,
G.
,
Koziel
,
K.
,
Evans
,
T.
,
Moorhouse
,
A.
,
Steele
,
A.
, and
Waddington
,
D.
(
2011
). “Human response to vibration in residential environments (NANR209), Determination of exposure-response relationships,” Technical Report 6 (Defra, London).
49.
Yonekawa
,
Y.
(
1977
). “
Evaluation of bullet train vibration for residents near railways
,”
Indust. Health
15
,
23
32
.
50.
Zapfe
,
J. A.
,
Saurenman
,
H.
, and
Fidell
,
S.
(
2009
). “Ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit,” Contractor's Final Report for TCRP Project D-12 - Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration in Buildings Caused by Rail Transit, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
You do not currently have access to this content.