This paper presents the main findings of a field survey conducted in the United Kingdom into the human response to vibration in residential environments. The main aim of this study was to derive exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to vibration from environmental sources. The sources of vibration considered in this paper are railway and construction activity. Annoyance data were collected using questionnaires conducted face-to-face with residents in their own homes. Questionnaires were completed with residents exposed to railway induced vibration (N = 931) and vibration from the construction of a light rail system (N = 350). Measurements of vibration were conducted at internal and external positions from which estimates of 24-h vibration exposure were derived for 1073 of the case studies. Sixty different vibration exposure descriptors along with 6 different frequency weightings were assessed as potential predictors of annoyance. Of the exposure descriptors considered, none were found to be a better predictor of annoyance than any other. However, use of relevant frequency weightings was found to improve correlation between vibration exposure and annoyance. A unified exposure-response relationship could not be derived due to differences in response to the two sources so separate relationships are presented for each source.

1.
ANC (
2001
). Association of Noise Consultants Guidelines: Measurement and Assessment of Groundborne Noise and Vibration (ANC guidelines), Fresco, pp. 1–173.
2.
Arnberg
,
P. W.
,
Bennerhult
,
O.
, and
Eberhardt
,
J. L.
(
1990
). “
Sleep disturbances caused by vibrations from heavy road traffic
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
1486
1493
.
3.
Bellmann
,
M. A.
(
2002
). “
Perception of whole-body vibrations: From basic experiments to effects of seat and steering-wheel vibrations on the passenger's comfort inside vehicles
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Oldenburg
, Germany.
4.
Berry
,
B. F.
, and
Flindell
,
I. H.
(
2009
). “Estimating dose-response relationships between noise exposure and human health impacts in the UK,” Defra (London).
5.
Brink
,
M.
, and
Wunderli
,
J.-M.
(
2010
). “
A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
2301
2311
.
6.
Brown
,
A.
, and
Van Kamp
,
I.
(
2009
). “
Response to a change in transport noise exposure: A review of evidence of a change effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
3018
3029
.
8.
BS 6472-1:2008 (
2008
). Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Vibration sources other than blasting (British Standards Institution, London).
9.
BS 6841:1987 (
1987
). Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock (British Standards Institution, London).
10.
BS EN ISO 8041:2005 (
2005
). Human response to vibration. Measuring instrumentation (British Standards Institution, London).
11.
Condie
,
J.
,
Steele
,
A.
,
Whittle
,
N.
,
Brown
,
P.
, and
Waddington
,
D.
(
2011
). “
Human response to vibration in residential environments (NANR209)
,” Technical Report 2: Measurement of Response, University of Salford, Defra, London.
13.
Fidell
,
S.
,
Pearsons
,
K.
,
Silvati
,
L.
, and
Sneddon
,
M.
(
2002
). “
Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1743
1750
.
12.
Fidell
,
S.
,
Silvati
,
L.
, and
Pearsons
,
K.
(
1999
). “
Field study of the annoyance of low-frequency runway sideline noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1408
1415
.
14.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1993
). “
Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2753
2763
.
15.
Fields
,
J. M.
,
de Jong
,
R. G.
,
Gjestland
,
T.
,
Flindell
,
I. H.
,
Job
,
R. F. S.
,
Kurra
,
S.
,
Lercher
,
P.
,
Vallet
,
M.
,
Guski
,
R.
,
Felscher-Suhr
,
U.
, and
Schuemer
,
R.
(
2001
). “
Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation
,”
J. Sound Vib.
242
,
641
679
.
16.
Fields
,
J. M.
, and
Walker
,
J.
(
1982
). “
The response to railway noise in residential areas in Great Britain
,”
J. Sound Vib.
85
,
177
255
.
17.
Gidlöf-Gunnarsson
,
A.
,
Ögren
,
M.
,
Jerson
,
T.
, and
Öhrström
,
E.
(
2012
). “
Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors
,”
Noise Health
,
14
,
190
201
.
17.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn
,
C. G.
, and
Miedema
,
H.
(
2006
). “
Multilevel grouped regression for analyzing self-reported health in relation to environmental factors: the model and its application
,”
Biomet. J.
48
,
67
82
.
18.
Guski
,
R.
(
1999
). “
The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it
,”
J. Sound Vib.
223
,
513
527
.
19.
Howarth
,
H.
, and
Griffin
,
M.
(
1988
). “
The frequency dependence of subjective reaction to vertical and horizontal whole-body vibration at low magnitudes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
1406
1413
.
20.
ISO 2631-1:1997. (
1997
). Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 1: General requirements (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
21.
ISO 2631-2:2003. (
2003
). Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz) (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
22.
ISO/TS 15666:2003. (
2003
). Acoustics. Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
23.
Job
,
R.
(
1988
). “
Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
991
1001
.
25.
Klæboe
,
R.
,
Öhrström
,
E.
,
Turunen-Rise
,
I.
,
Bendtsen
,
H.
, and
Nykanen
,
H.
(
2003a
). “
Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part III: Towards a common methodology for socio-vibrational surveys
,”
Appl. Acoust.
64
,
111
120
.
26.
Klæboe
,
R.
,
Turunen-Rise
,
I.
,
Hårvik
,
L.
, and
Madshus
,
C.
(
2003b
). “
Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part II: Exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models
,”
Appl. Acoust.
64
,
89
109
.
27.
Miedema
,
H.
, and
Oudshoorn
,
C. G.
(
2001
). “
Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
,
409
416
.
28.
Miedema
,
H.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1998
). “
Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3432
3445
.
29.
Miedema
,
H.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1999
). “
Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
3336
3344
.
30.
Morioka
,
M.
, and
Griffin
,
M. J.
(
2006
). “
Magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical hand-transmitted vibration
,”
J. Sound Vib.
295
,
633
648
.
30.
NT ACOU 106 (
2001
). “Acoustics: Assessment of annoyance caused by vibrations in dwellings from road and rail traffic by means of socio- vibrational and social surveys,” Nordtest, Finland.
31.
Ögren
,
M.
, and
Öhrström
,
E.
(
2009
). “
Effects of railway noise and vibrations on sleep—experimental studies within the Swedish research program TVANE
,” in
Proceedings of Euronoise
, pp.
1214
1221
.
32.
Parsons
,
K.
, and
Griffin
,
M.
(
1988
). “
Whole-body vibration perception thresholds
,”
J. Sound Vib.
121
,
237
258
.
32.
Peris
,
E.
,
Woodcock
,
J.
,
Sica
,
G.
,
Sharp
,
C.
,
Moorhouse
,
A. T.
, and
Waddington
,
D. C.
(
2014
). “
Effect of situational, attitudinal and demographic factors on railway vibration annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
194
204
.
34.
Schomer
,
P.
,
Mestre
,
V.
,
Fidell
,
S.
,
Berry
,
B.
,
Gjestland
,
T.
,
Vallet
,
M.
, and
Reid
,
T.
(
2012
). “
Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
2772
2786
.
35.
Schomer
,
P. D.
, and
Neathammer
,
R. D.
(
1987
). “
The role of helicopter noise-induced vibration and rattle in human response
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
966
976
.
36.
Schultz
,
T. J.
(
1978
). “
Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
377
405
.
36.
Sharp
,
C.
,
Woodcock
,
J.
,
Sica
,
G.
,
Peris
,
E.
,
Moorhouse
,
A. T.
, and
Waddington
,
D. C.
(
2014
). “
Developing exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
205
212
.
37.
Sica
,
G.
,
Peris
,
E.
,
Woodcock
,
J. S.
,
Moorhouse
,
A. T.
, and
Waddington
,
D. C.
(
2013
). “
Design of measurement methodology for the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in residential environments
,”
Sci. Total Environ.
(in press).
38.
TRL, Temple, ISVR, and Arup Acoustics (
2007
). NANR172 Human response to vibration in residential environments, Defra, London.
40.
Woodruff
,
H. J.
, and
Griffin
,
M. J.
(
1987
). “
A survey of the effect of railway-induced building vibration on the community
,” Institute of Sound and Vibration Research Technical Report, UK.
41.
Woods
,
R.
(
1997
). “
Dynamic effects of pile installations on adjacent structures
,”
NCHRP 253
,
National Academy Press
,
Washington, DC
(Transportation Research Board), pp.
8
9
.
42.
Zapfe
,
J. A.
,
Saurenman
,
H.
, and
Fidell
,
S.
(
2009
). “Ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit,” TCRP Project D-12.
You do not currently have access to this content.