Acoustic intensity is normally treated as a real quantity, but in recent years, many articles have appeared in which intensity is treated as a complex quantity where the real (active) part is related to local mean energy flow and the imaginary (reactive) part to local oscillatory transport of energy. This offers the potential to recover additional information about a sound field and then to relate this to the properties of the sound source and the environment that surrounds it. However, this approach is applicable only to multi-modal sound fields, which places significant demands on the accuracy of the intensity measurements. Accordingly, this article investigates the accuracy of complex intensity measurements obtained using a tri-axial Microflown intensity probe by comparing measurement and prediction for sound propagation in an open flanged pipe. Under plane wave conditions, comparison between prediction and experiment reveals good agreement, but when a higher order mode is present, the reactive intensity field becomes complicated and agreement is less successful. It is concluded that the potential application of complex intensity as a diagnostic tool is limited by difficulties in measuring reactive intensity in complex sound fields when using current state of the art acoustic instrumentation.

1.
F. J.
Fahy
,
Sound Intensity
(
E and FN Spon
,
London
,
1995
), pp.
38
99
.
2.
J. A.
Mann
and
J.
Tichy
, “
Near-field identification of vibration sources, resonant cavities, and diffraction using acoustic intensity measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
(
2
),
720
729
(
1991
).
3.
J. A.
Mann
and
J.
Tichy
, “
Acoustic intensity analysis: Distinguishing energy propagation and wave-front propagation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
(
1
),
20
25
(
1991
).
4.
N.
Prodi
and
D.
Stanzial
, “
A novel intensimetric technique for monitoring the radiative properties of sound fields
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
47
(
5
),
363
372
(
1999
).
5.
R. J.
Barton
,
K. B.
Smith
, and
I. H. T.
Vincent
, “
Characterization of scattered acoustic intensity fields in the resonance region of a motionless rigid sphere
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
6
),
EL240
EL245
(
2010
).
6.
F.
Jacobsen
, “
A note on instantaneous and time-averaged active and reactive sound intensity
,”
J. Sound Vib.
147
(
3
),
489
496
(
1991
).
7.
R. C.
Heyser
, “
Instantaneous intensity
,”
AES 81st Convention
, Los Angeles, CA (
1986
).
8.
G.
Schiffrer
and
D.
Stanzial
, “
Energetic properties of acoustic fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
(
6
),
3645
3653
(
1994
).
9.
D.
Stanzial
,
N.
Prodi
, and
G.
Schiffrer
, “
Reactive acoustic intensity for general fields and energy polarization
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
(
4
),
1868
1876
(
1996
).
10.
D.
Stanzial
and
N.
Prodi
, “
Measurements of newly defined intensimetric quantities and their physical interpretation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
(
4
),
2033
2039
(
1997
).
11.
D.
Stanzial
,
G.
Sacchi
, and
G.
Schiffrer
, “
On the physical meaning of the power factor in acoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
1
),
269
280
(
2012
).
12.
J. A.
Mann
,
J.
Tichy
, and
A. J.
Romano
, “
Instantaneous and time-averaged energy transfer in acoustic fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
(
1
),
17
30
(
1987
).
13.
B. R.
Rapids
and
G. C.
Lauchle
, “
Vector intensity field scattered by a rigid prolate spheroid
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(
1
),
38
48
(
2006
).
14.
R. J.
Barton
,
K. B.
Smith
, and
H. T.
Vincent
, “
A characterization of the scattered acoustic intensity field in the resonance region for simple spheres
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
5
),
2772
2784
(
2011
).
15.
F.
Jacobsen
and
A. R.
Molares
, “
Ensemble statistics of active and reactive sound intensity in reverberation rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
1
),
211
218
(
2011
).
16.
C. E.
Dean
and
J. P.
Braselton
, “
Visualization of the energy flow for elastic waves: Comparison and contrast of conventional vector field vs. color coded representation of the poynting vector
,” in
Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 2003
(
World Scientific
,
Hackensack, NJ
,
2003
), pp.
78
90
.
17.
Information on Microflown available at www.microflown.com (Last viewed 11/6/
2013
).
18.
H. -E. d.
Bree
, “
The microflown: An acoustic particle velocity sensor
,”
Acoust. Aust.
31
,
91
94
(
2003
).
19.
F.
Jacobsen
and
V.
Jaud
, “
A note on the calibration of pressure-velocity sound intensity probes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(
2
),
830
837
(
2006
).
20.
W.
Duan
and
R.
Kirby
, “
A hybrid finite element approach to modeling sound radiation from circular and rectangular ducts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
5
),
3638
3649
(
2012
).
21.
R.
Kirby
, “
Modeling sound propagation in acoustic waveguides using a hybrid numerical method
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
4
),
1930
1940
(
2008
).
22.
D.
Stanzial
,
G.
Sacchi
, and
G.
Schiffrer
, “
Calibration of pressure-velocity probes using a progressive plane wave reference field and comparison with nominal calibration filters
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
(
6
),
3745
3755
(
2011
).
23.
T. G. H.
Basten
and
H.-E.
d. Bree
, “
Full bandwidth calibration procedure for acoustic probes containing a pressure and particle velocity sensor
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
(
1
),
264
270
(
2010
).
You do not currently have access to this content.