The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential relationship between speaking fundamental frequency and acoustic vowel space size, thus testing a possible perceptual source of sex-specific differences in acoustic vowel space size based on the greater inter-harmonic spacing and a poorer definition of the spectral envelope of higher pitched voices. Average fundamental frequencies and acoustic vowel spaces of 56 female German speakers are analyzed. Several parameters are used to quantify the size and shape of the vowel space defined by /iː ε aː ɔ uː/ such as the area of the polygon spanned by the five vowels, the absolute difference in F1 or F2 between /iː/ and /uː/ or /aː/, and the Euclidian distance between /iː/ and /aː/. In addition, the potential impact of nasality on the vowel space size is examined. Results reveal no significant correlation between fundamental frequency and vowel space size suggesting other factors must be responsible for the larger female acoustic vowel space.

1.
Bates
,
D.
,
Maechler
,
M.
, and
Bolker
,
B.
(
2011
). “lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes,” R package version 0.999375-42.
2.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2012
). “praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.23) [computer code],” http://www.praat.org/ (Last viewed August 7, 2012).
3.
Boë
,
L.-J.
,
Contini
,
M.
, and
Rakotofiringa
,
H.
(
1975
). “
Étude statistique de la fréquence laryngienne” (“Empirical study on laryngeal frequency”)
,
Phonetica
,
32
,
1
23
.
4.
Brizendine
,
L.
(
2006
).
The Female Brain
(
Morgan Road
,
New York
), pp.
1
304
.
5.
Byrd
,
D.
(
1992
). “
Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
593
596
.
6.
Dang
,
J.
, and
Honda
,
K.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic characteristics of the human paranasal sinuses derived from transmission characteristic measurement and morphological observation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
3374
3383
.
7.
Diehl
,
R. L.
,
B.
Lindblom
,
K. A.
Hoemeke
, and
R. P.
Fahey
. (
1996
). “
On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories
,”
J. Phonetics
24
,
187
208
.
8.
Eckert
,
P.
(
1989
). “
The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation
,”
Lang. Var. Change
1
,
245
267
.
9.
Ericsdotter
,
C.
, and
Ericsson
,
A. M.
(
2001
). “
Gender differences in vowel duration in read Swedish: Preliminary results
,” in
Proceedings of Fonetik 2001, XIVth Swedish Phonetics Conference. Working Papers of the Department of Linguistics
,
Lund University
,
Lund, Sweden
, Vol.
49
, pp.
34
37
.
10.
Fant
,
G.
(
1960
).
Acoustic Theory of Speech Production
(
Mouton
,
The Hague
), pp.
1
328
.
11.
Fant
,
G.
(
1966
). “
A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scaling
,”
STL QPSR
4
,
22
30
.
12.
Heffernan
,
K.
(
2010
). “
Mumbling is macho: Phonetic distinctiveness in the speech of American radio DJs
,”
Am. Speech
85
,
67
90
.
13.
Henton
,
C. G.
(
1995
). “
Cross-language variation in the vowels of female and male speakers
,” in
Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, Stockholm, Vol.
4
, pp.
420
423
.
14.
Henton
,
C. G.
, and
Bladon
,
R. A. W.
(
1985
). “
Breathiness in normal female speech: Inefficiency versus desirability
,”
Lang. Commun.
5
,
221
227
.
15.
Henton
,
C. G.
, and
Bladon
,
R. A. W.
(
1988
). “
Creak as a sociophonetic marker
,” in
Language, Speech and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin
, edited by
L. M.
Hyman
and
C. N.
Li
(
Routledge
,
London
), pp.
3
29
.
16.
Hillenbrand
,
J.
,
L. A.
Getty
,
M. J.
Clark
, and
K.
Wheeler
(
1995
). “
Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3099
3111
.
17.
Hothorn
,
T.
,
Bretz
,
F.
, and
Westfall
,
P.
(
2008
). “
Simultaneous inference in general parametric models
,”
Biom. J.
50
(
3
),
346
363
.
18.
House
,
A.
, and
Stevens
,
K. N
(
1956
). “
Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels
,”
J. Speech Hear. Disord.
21
(
2
),
218
232
.
19.
Johnson
,
K.
, and
Martin
,
J.
(
2001
). “
Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: Effects of distinctive length and position in the word
,”
Phonetica
,
58
,
81
102
.
20.
Klatt
,
D. H.
, and
Klatt
,
L. C.
(
1990
). “
Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
820
857
.
21.
Labov
,
W.
(
1990
). “
The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change
,”
Lang. Var. Change
2
,
205
254
.
22.
Maeda
,
S.
(
1982
). “
A digital simulation method of the vocal-tract system
,”
Speech Commun.
1
,
199
229
.
23.
Martin
,
P.
(
2001
). “
Les voyelles nasales en français du Québec” (“Nasal vowels in Québec French”)
,
Linguist.
37
,
49
70
.
24.
McCormack
,
P. F.
, and
Knighton
,
T.
(
1996
). “
Gender differences in the speech patterns of two-and-a-half-year-old children
,” in
Speech Science and Technology: Sixth Australian International Conference
, edited by
P. F.
McCormack
and
A.
Russell
(
Australian Speech Science and Technology Association
,
Adelaide
), pp.
337
341
.
25.
McDougall
,
K.
(
2006
). “
Dynamic features of speech and the characterisation of speakers: Towards a new approach using formant frequencies
,”
Int. J. Speech, Lang. Law
13
(
1
),
89
126
.
26.
Mennen
,
I.
Schaeffler
,
F.
, and
Docherty
,
G.
(
2012
). “
Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
(
3
),
2249
2260
.
27.
Peterson
,
G. E.
, and
Barney
,
H. L.
(
1952
). “
Control methods used in the study of vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
24
,
175
184
.
28.
R Development Core Team (
2008
). “R: A language and environment for statistical computing,” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. (Last viewed 07/19/2012).
29.
Ryalls
,
J. H.
, and
Lieberman
,
P.
(
1982
). “
Fundamental frequency and vowel perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1631
1634
.
30.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
1998
). “
Phonetische Datenbanken des Deutschen in der empirischen Sprachforschung und der phonologischen Theoriebildung
,” (“Phonetic databases of German in empirical speech research and the foundation of phonological therories”), Arbeitsberichte des Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), Vol. 33, pp.
1
233
.
31.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2001
). “
Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2153
2164
.
32.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2002
). “
Gender-specific articulatory-acoustic relations in vowel sequences
,”
J. Phonetics
30
,
417
435
.
33.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2009
). “
Phonetic differences between male and female speech
,”
Lang. Linguist. Compass
3
(
2
),
621
640
.
34.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2011
). “
Is there a relationship between acoustic vowel space size and fundamental frequency
?” in
Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, Hong Kong, pp.
1854
1857
.
35.
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2012
). “
The first and second harmonics should not be used to measure breathiness in male and female voices
,”
J. Phonetics
40
,
477
490
.
36.
Simpson
,
A. P.
, and
Ericsdotter
,
C.
(
2003
). “
Sex-specific durational differences in English and Swedish
,” in
Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, Barcelona, pp.
1113
1116
.
37.
Simpson
,
A. P.
, and
Ericsdotter
,
C.
(
2007
). “
Sex-specific differences in f0 and vowel space
,” in
Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, Saarbrücken, pp.
933
936
.
38.
Södersten
,
M.
, and
Lindestad
,
P. -Å.
(
1990
). “
Glottal closure and perceived breathiness during phonation in normally speaking subjects
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
33
(
3
),
601
611
.
39.
Södersten
,
M.
, and
Lindestad
,
P. -Å.
(
1992
). “
A comparison of vocal fold closure in rigid telescopic and flexible fiberoptic laryngostroboscopy
,”
Acta Otolaryngol.
112
(
1
),
144
150
.
40.
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
1998
).
Acoustic Phonetics
(
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
), pp.
1
607
.
41.
Sundberg
,
J.
(
2009
). “
Articulatory configuration and pitch in a classically trained soprano singer
,”
J. Voice
23
,
546
551
.
42.
Takefuta
,
Y.
,
Jancosek
,
E. G.
, and
Brunt
,
M.
(
1972
). “
A statistical analysis of melody curves in the intonation of American English
,” in
Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, Montreal, pp.
1035
1039
.
43.
Titze
,
I. R.
(
1989
). “
Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
1699
1707
.
51.
Traunmüller
,
H.
(
1984
). “
Articulatory and perceptual factors controlling the age- and sexconditioned variability in formant frequencies of vowels
,”
Speech Commun.
3
,
49
61
.
44.
Traunmüller
,
H.
(
1997
). “
Auditory scales of frequency representation
,” http://www.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/bark.htm (Last viewed 09/17/2012).
45.
Wassink
,
A. B.
(
1999
). “
A sociophonetic analysis of Jamaican vowels
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Michigan
.
46.
Weirich
,
M.
(
2012
). “
The influence of NATURE and NURTURE on speaker-specific parameters in twins' speech: Articulation, acoustics and perception
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
.
47.
Weirich
,
M.
, and
Simpson
,
A. P.
(
2013
). “Acoustic vowel space size and perceived speech tempo,” POMA 19060217, DOI:.
48.
Whiteside
,
S. P.
(
1996
). “
Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: Some evidence for speaker sex differences
,”
J. Int. Phonetic Assoc.
26
,
23
40
.
49.
Whiteside
,
S. P.
(
2001
). “
Sex-specific fundamental and formant frequency patterns in a cross-sectional study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
464
478
.
50.
Winkler
,
R.
,
Fuchs
,
S.
, and
Perrier
,
P.
(
2006
). “
The relation between differences in vocal tract geometry and articulatory control strategies in the production of French vowels: Evidence from MRI and modeling
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production
, Ubatuba, pp.
509
516
.
You do not currently have access to this content.