Methods for the fully automatic detection and species classification of odontocete whistles are described. The detector applies a number of noise cancellation techniques to a spectrogram of sound data and then searches for connected regions of data which rise above a pre-determined threshold. When tested on a dataset of recordings which had been carefully annotated by a human operator, the detector was able to detect (recall) 79.6% of human identified sounds that had a signal-to-noise ratio above 10 dB, with 88% of the detections being valid. A significant problem with automatic detectors is that they tend to partially detect whistles or break whistles into several parts. A classifier has been developed specifically to work with fragmented whistle detections. By accumulating statistics over many whistle fragments, correct classification rates of over 94% have been achieved for four species. The success rate is, however, heavily dependent on the number of species included in the classifier mix, with the mean correct classification rate dropping to 58.5% when 12 species were included.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2013
September 01 2013
Automatic detection and classification of odontocete whistlesa)
Douglas Gillespie;
Douglas Gillespie
b)
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute,
University of St. Andrews
, St. Andrews, KY16 8LB, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
Marjolaine Caillat;
Marjolaine Caillat
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute,
University of St. Andrews
, St. Andrews, KY16 8LB, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Gordon;
Jonathan Gordon
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute,
University of St. Andrews
, St. Andrews, KY16 8LB, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul White
Paul White
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
b)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
a)
This manuscript is intended for the special issue on Methods for Marine Mammal Passive Acoustics, Guest Editor, David Mellinger.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 2427–2437 (2013)
Article history
Received:
June 27 2012
Accepted:
December 10 2012
Citation
Douglas Gillespie, Marjolaine Caillat, Jonathan Gordon, Paul White; Automatic detection and classification of odontocete whistles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2013; 134 (3): 2427–2437. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4816555
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
Automated extraction of odontocete whistle contours
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2011)
Automatic classification of delphinids based on the representative frequencies of whistles
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2015)
Joint classification of whistles and echolocation clicks from odontocetes
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2013)
Combining whistle acoustic parameters to discriminate Mediterranean odontocetes during passive acoustic monitoring
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2014)
A description of sounds recorded from melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra) off Hawai‘i
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2010)