Quantitative measures of acoustic similarity can reveal patterns of shared vocal behavior in social species. Many methods for computing similarity have been developed, but their performance has not been extensively characterized in noisy environments and with vocalizations characterized by complex frequency modulations. This paper describes methods of bioacoustic comparison based on dynamic time warping (DTW) of the fundamental frequency or spectrogram. Fundamental frequency is estimated using a Bayesian particle filter adaptation of harmonic template matching. The methods were tested on field recordings of flight calls from superb starlings, Lamprotornis superbus, for how well they could separate distinct categories of call elements (motifs). The fundamental-frequency-based method performed best, but the spectrogram-based method was less sensitive to noise. Both DTW methods provided better separation of categories than spectrographic cross correlation, likely due to substantial variability in the duration of superb starling flight call motifs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2013
August 01 2013
Pitch- and spectral-based dynamic time warping methods for comparing field recordings of harmonic avian vocalizations
C Daniel Meliza;
C Daniel Meliza
a)
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy,
University of Chicago
, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60622
Search for other works by this author on:
Sara C. Keen;
Sara C. Keen
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology,
Columbia University
, New York, New York 10027
Search for other works by this author on:
Dustin R. Rubenstein
Dustin R. Rubenstein
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology,
Columbia University
, New York, New York 10027
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 1407–1415 (2013)
Article history
Received:
December 15 2012
Accepted:
May 29 2013
Citation
C Daniel Meliza, Sara C. Keen, Dustin R. Rubenstein; Pitch- and spectral-based dynamic time warping methods for comparing field recordings of harmonic avian vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2013; 134 (2): 1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4812269
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
A Brief history of avian bioacoustics
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)
Automating identification of avian vocalizations using time–frequency information extracted from the Gabor transform
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2012)
Integration over song classification replicates: Song variant analysis in the hihi
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2015)
Urban habitats and noise impact avian communities and shape vocal mimicry in a songbird
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2022)
Rainforests as concert halls for birds: Are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2006)