This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech—a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis—leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2013
August 01 2013
Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech Available to Purchase
Megan J. McAuliffe;
Megan J. McAuliffe
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizabeth M. R. Gibson;
Elizabeth M. R. Gibson
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Sarah E. Kerr;
Sarah E. Kerr
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Tim Anderson;
Tim Anderson
New Zealand Brain Research Institute
, 66 Stewart Street, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick J. LaShell
Patrick J. LaShell
New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Megan J. McAuliffe
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Elizabeth M. R. Gibson
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Sarah E. Kerr
Department of Communication Disorders and New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Tim Anderson
New Zealand Brain Research Institute
, 66 Stewart Street, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
Patrick J. LaShell
New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury
, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 1358–1368 (2013)
Article history
Received:
August 13 2012
Accepted:
June 12 2013
Citation
Megan J. McAuliffe, Elizabeth M. R. Gibson, Sarah E. Kerr, Tim Anderson, Patrick J. LaShell; Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2013; 134 (2): 1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4812764
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Effects of network selection and acoustic environment on bounding-box object detection of delphinid whistles using a deep learning tool
Peter C. Sugarman, Elizabeth L. Ferguson, et al.
Introduction to the special issue on: Advances in soundscape: Emerging trends and challenges in research and practice
Francesco Aletta, Bhan Lam, et al.
Related Content
Cognitive predictors of older adults’ perception of difficult speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2016)
Cognitive factors as predictors of accented speech perception for younger and older adults
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2017)
The effect of listener age on the recognition of dysarthric speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2011)
A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2017)
Individual differences in the perception of regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2016)