The present paper reports a socio-acoustic survey carried out in three large urban parks in Rome, selected on the basis of the outcome of a preliminary online survey. According to the experimental protocol applied in a previous study carried out in Milan and Naples, binaural recordings in 85 sites and interviews with 266 users of the three parks were performed only during the day in summertime. On the basis of selected acoustical descriptors, the sonic environment of the three parks was categorized and, thanks to statistical analysis, three clusters were identified. The results confirm that the sound environment in urban parks is often considered as “good” or “excellent” even if the sound pressure level is nearly always higher than the limits commonly used to define quiet areas. This is due to the influence of other factors, such as the presence of trees, natural features, and the tranquility; all of these components cannot be neglected in the assessment of the soundscape because they directly affect the psychological state of the person.

1.
M.
Nilsson
, “
Soundscape quality in urban open space
,” in
Proceedings of InterNoise 2007
,
Istanbul, Turkey
(
2007
).
2.
B.
Schulte-Fortkamp
and
D.
Dubois
, “
Recent advances in soundscape research
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
92
(
6
),
V
VIII
(
2006
).
3.
J.
Kang
,
Urban Sound Environment
(
Taylor & Francis
,
London
,
2007
), Chap. 3, pp.
57
81
.
4.
R.
Pheasant
,
K.
Horoshenkov
,
G.
Watts
, and
B.
Barret
, “
The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
1446
1457
(
2008
).
5.
A. L.
Irwin
,
D. A.
Hall
,
A.
Peters
, and
C. J.
Plack
, “
Listening to urban soundscapes: Physiological validity of perceptual dimensions
,”
Psychophysiology
48
,
258
268
(
2011
).
6.
O.
Axelsson
,
M. E.
Nilsson
, and
B.
Berglund
, “
A principal components model of soundscape perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
2836
2846
(
2010
).
7.
G.
Watts
,
R.
Pheasant
, and
K.
Horoshenkov
, “
Tranquil spaces in a metropolitan area
,” in
Proceedings, I. C. A. 2010
,
Sydney, Australia
(
2010
).
8.
G.
Brambilla
and
P.
Verardi
, “
Soundscape in urban parks and wilderness areas: A review of studies in Italy
,” in
Proceedings of InterNoise 2009
,
Ottawa, Canada
(
2009
).
9.
G.
Brambilla
,
L.
Maffei
, and
G.
Zambon
, “
Preserving natural quiet areas and urban parks
,” in
Proceedings of InterNoise 2006
,
Honolulu, HI, USA
(
2006
).
10.
J. M.
Grey
and
J. W.
Gordon
, “
Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
1493
1500
(
1978
).
11.
B.
De Coensel
and
D.
Botteldooren
, “
The quiet rural soundscape and how to characterize it
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
92
,
887
897
(
2006
).
12.
P.
Kampstra
, “
Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions
,”
J. Stat. Software
28
,
1
9
(
2008
).
13.
H.
Fastl
and
E.
Zwicker
,
Psychoacoustics. Facts and Models
, 3th ed. (
Springer Verlag
,
Berlin
,
2006
), Chap. 16, pp.
320
329
.
14.
K.
Genuit
and
A.
Fiebig
, “
The acoustic description of patterns in soundscapes
,” in
Proceedings InterNoise 2007
,
Istanbul, Turkey
(
2007
).
15.
S. R.
Payne
, “
Are perceived soundscapes within urban parks restorative?
,” in
Proceedings of Acoustics'08
,
Paris, France
(
2008
).
16.
M.
Raimbault
,
C.
Lavandier
, and
M.
Bérengier
, “
Ambient sound assessment of urban environments: Field studies in two French cities
,”
Appl. Acoust.
64
,
1241
1256
(
2003
).
17.
N. S.
Bruce
,
W.
Davies
, and
M. D.
Adams
, “
Expectation as a factor in the perception of soundscapes
,” in
Proceedings of Euronoise 2009
,
Edinburgh
,
UK
(
2009
).
18.
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
, “
Ljudkvalitet i Natur-och Kulturmiljöer (Sound quality in natural and cultural environments)
,” Report 5440, Stockholm (
2005
).
You do not currently have access to this content.