Coherence masking protection (CMP) is the phenomenon in which a low-frequency target (typically a first formant) is labeled accurately in poorer signal-to-noise levels when combined with a high-frequency cosignal, rather than presented alone. An earlier study by the authors revealed greater CMP for children than adults, with more resistance to disruptions in harmonicity across spectral components [Nittrouer and Tarr (2011). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 2606–2623]. That finding was interpreted as demonstrating that children are obliged to process speech signals as broad spectral patterns, regardless of the harmonic structure of the spectral components. The current study tested three alternative, auditory explanations for the observed coherence of target + cosignal: (1) unique spectral shapes of target + cosignal support labeling, (2) periodicity of target + cosignal promotes coherence, and (3) temporal synchrony across target + cosignal reinforces temporal expectancies. Adults, eight-year-olds, and five-year-olds labeled stimuli in five conditions: F1 only and F1 + a constant cosignal (both used previously) were benchmarks for comparing thresholds for F1 + 3 new cosignals. Children again showed greater CMP than adults, but none of the three hypotheses could explain their CMP. It was again concluded that children are obliged to recognize speech signals as broad spectral patterns.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2013
June 05 2013
Explaining coherence in coherence masking protection for adults and children
Eric Tarr;
Eric Tarr
a)
Department of Otolaryngology,
The Ohio State University
, 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 4000, Columbus, Ohio 43212
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan Nittrouer
Susan Nittrouer
Department of Otolaryngology,
The Ohio State University
, 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 4000, Columbus, Ohio 43212
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 4218–4231 (2013)
Article history
Received:
June 30 2012
Accepted:
March 22 2013
Citation
Eric Tarr, Susan Nittrouer; Explaining coherence in coherence masking protection for adults and children. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 June 2013; 133 (6): 4218–4231. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4802638
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
Why diverse spectral structure coheres for children.
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2011)
Coherence masking protection for mid-frequency formants by adults and children
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2011)
Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2012)
Coherence masking protection in brief noise complexes: Effects of temporal patterns
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1997)
Does harmonicity explain children’s cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2009)