The representation of speech goals was explored using an auditory feedback paradigm. When talkers produce vowels the formant structure of which is perturbed in real time, they compensate to preserve the intended goal. When vowel formants are shifted up or down in frequency, participants change the formant frequencies in the opposite direction to the feedback perturbation. In this experiment, the specificity of vowel representation was explored by examining the magnitude of vowel compensation when the second formant frequency of a vowel was perturbed for speakers of two different languages (English and French). Even though the target vowel was the same for both language groups, the pattern of compensation differed. French speakers compensated to smaller perturbations and made larger compensations overall. Moreover, French speakers modified the third formant in their vowels to strengthen the compensation even though the third formant was not perturbed. English speakers did not alter their third formant. Changes in the perceptual goodness ratings by the two groups of participants were consistent with the threshold to initiate vowel compensation in production. These results suggest that vowel goals not only specify the quality of the vowel but also the relationship of the vowel to the vowel space of the spoken language.

1.
Anderson
,
S. R.
(
1985
).
Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations
(
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago, IL
), pp.
1
350
.
3.
Bauer
,
J. J.
,
Mittal
,
J.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
2006
). “
Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2363
2371
.
4.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
1995
). “
A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1916
1924
.
5.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Freeland
,
M. B.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
1998
). “
Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3153
3161
.
6.
Cowie
,
R. J.
, and
Douglas-Cowie
,
E.
(
1983
). “
Speech production in profound postlingual deafness
,” in
Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders
, edited by
M. E.
Lutman
and
M. P.
Haggard
(
Academic
,
New York
), pp.
183
230
.
7.
Cowie
,
R. J.
, and
Douglas-Cowie
,
E.
(
1992
).
Postlingually Acquired Deafness: Speech Deterioration and the Wider Consequences
(
Mouton De Gruyter
,
New York
), p.
320
.
8.
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
1995
). “
Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production
,”
Psychol. Rev.
102
,
594
621
.
9.
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Hamoson
,
M.
, and
Johnson
,
D.
(
1998
). “
A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements
,”
Psychol. Rev.
105
,
611
633
.
10.
Henke
,
W. E.
(
1966
). “
Dynamic articulatory model of speech production using computer simulation
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
.
11.
Hose
,
B.
,
Langner
,
G.
, and
Scheich
,
H.
(
1983
). “
Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels
,”
Hear. Res.
9
,
13
25
.
12.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
2002
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation of speech. I: Compensation and adaptation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
295
310
.
13.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Nagarajan
,
S. S.
(
2011
). “
Speech production as state feedback control
,”
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
5
(82),
1
14
.
14.
Iverson
,
P.
, and
Evans
,
B. G.
(
2007
). “
Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2842
2854
.
15.
Jackson
,
M. T.-T.
, and
McGowan
,
R. S.
(
2012
). “
A study of high front vowels with articulatory data and acoustic simulations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
3017
3035
.
16.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2000
). “
Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1246
1251
.
17.
Kröger
,
B. J.
,
Kannampuzha
,
J.
, and
Neuschaefer-Rube
,
C.
(
2009
). “
Towards a neurocomputational model of speech production and perception
,”
Speech Commun.
51
,
793
809
.
18.
Kuhl
,
P. K.
(
1991
). “
Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
50
,
93
107
.
19.
Lambancher
,
S. G.
,
Martens
,
W. L.
,
Kakehi
,
K.
,
Marasinghe
,
C. A.
, and
Molholt
,
G.
(
2005
). “
The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese
,”
Appl. Psycholinguist.
26
,
227
247
.
20.
Liberman
,
A. M.
(
1996
).
Speech: A Special Code
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
), p.
31
.
21.
Lisker
,
L.
(
1974
). “
On time and timing in speech
,” in
Current Trends in Linguistics
, edited by
T. A.
Sebeok
(
Mouton
,
The Hague
), Vol.
12
, pp.
2378
2418
.
22.
Local
,
J.
(
2003
). “
Variable domains and variable relevance: Interpreting phonetic exponents
,”
J. Phonetics
31
,
321
339
.
23.
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Goldberg
,
R.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2010
). “
Compensation in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitude
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
1059
1068
.
24.
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Johnson
,
E. K.
,
Forsythe
,
J.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2012
). “
Children's development of self-regulation in speech production
,”
Curr. Biol.
22
,
113
117
.
25.
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2011
). “
Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
955
966
.
26.
Marian
,
V.
,
Blumenfeld
,
H. K.
, and
Kaushanskaya
,
M.
(
2007
). “
The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
940
967
.
27.
Mitsuya
,
T.
,
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2011
). “
A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
2978
2986
.
28.
Munhall
,
K. G.
,
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Byrne
,
S. K.
, and
Johnsrude
,
I.
(
2009
). “
Speakers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed to resist compensation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
384
390
.
29.
Nasir
,
S. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
(
2006
). “
Somatosensory precision in speech production
,”
Curr. Biol.
16
,
1918
1923
.
30.
Newman
,
R. S.
(
2003
). “
Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2850
2860
.
31.
Nguyen
,
N.
,
Wauquier
,
S.
, and
Tuller
,
B.
(
2009
). “
The dynamical approach to speech perception: From fine phonetic detail to abstract phonological categories
,” in
Approaches to Phonological Complexity
, edited by
F.
Pellegrino
,
E.
Marsico
,
I.
Chitoran
, and
C.
Coupé
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
Berlin
), pp.
5
31
.
32.
Orfanidis
,
S. J.
(
1988
).
Optimum Signal Processing: An Introduction
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
), p.
590
.
33.
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Levi
,
S. V.
(
2007
). “
Some observations on representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition
,” in
The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics
, edited by
M. G.
Gaskell
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
), pp.
3
18
.
34.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2006
). “
Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
966
977
.
35.
Schenk
,
B. S.
,
Baumgartner
,
W. D.
, and
Hamzavi
,
J. S.
(
2003
). “
Effects of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers
,”
Auris Nasau Larynx
30
,
333
339
.
36.
Schwartz
,
J.-L.
,
Beautemps
,
D.
,
Abry
,
C.
, and
Escudier
,
P.
(
1993
). “
Inter-individual and cross-linguistic strategies for the production of the [i] vs [y] contrast
,”
J. Phonetics
21
,
411
425
.
37.
Shiller
,
D. M.
,
Sato
,
M.
,
Gracco
,
V. L.
, and
Baum
,
S. R.
(
2009
). “
Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
1103
1113
.
38.
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
1998
).
Acoustic Phonetics
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
), pp.
257
322
.
39.
Strange
,
W.
,
Akahane-Yamada
,
R.
,
Kubo
,
R.
,
Trent
,
S. A.
, and
Nishi
,
K.
(
2001
). “
Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
1691
1704
.
40.
Strange
,
W.
,
Akahane-Yamada
,
R.
,
Kubo
,
R.
,
Trent
,
S. A.
,
Nishi
,
K.
, and
Jenkins
,
J. J.
(
1998
). “
Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners
,”
J. Phonetics
26
,
311
344
.
41.
Swingley
,
D.
(
2005
). “
11-month-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound
,”
Dev. Sci.
8
,
432
443
.
42.
Villacorta
,
V. M.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
, and
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
2007
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2306
2319
.
43.
Waldstein
,
R. S.
(
1990
). “
Effects of postlingual deadness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
2099
2114
.
44.
Whalen
,
D. H.
, and
Levitt
,
A. G.
(
1995
). “
The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels
,”
J. Phonetics
23
,
349
366
.
45.
Yang
,
B.
(
1996
). “
A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers
,”
J. Phonetics
24
,
245
262
.
You do not currently have access to this content.