Bone conduction communication systems employ a variety of transducers with different physical and electroacoustic properties, and these transducers may be worn at various skull locations. Testing these systems thus requires a reliable means of transducer calibration that can be implemented across different devices, skull locations, and settings. Unfortunately, existing calibration standards do not meet these criteria. Audiometric bone conduction standards focus on only one device model and on limited skull locations. Furthermore, while mechanical couplers may be used for calibration, the general human validity of their results is suspect. To address the need for more flexible, human-centered calibration methods, the authors investigated a procedure for bone transducer calibration, analogous to free-field methods for calibrating air conduction headphones. Participants listened to1s third-octave noise bands (125–12 500 Hz) alternating between a bone transducer and a loudspeaker and adjusted the bone transducer to match the perceived loudness of the loudspeaker at each test frequency. Participants tested two transducer models and two skull locations. Intra- and inter-subject reliability was high, and the resulting data differed by transducer, by location, and from the mechanical coupler. The described procedure is flexible to transducer model and skull location, requires only basic equipment, and directly yields perceptual data.
REFERENCES
1.
Acker-Mills
, B. E.
, Houtsma
, A. J. M.
, and Ahroon
, W. A.
(2005
). “Speech intelligibility with acoustic and contact microphones
,” in New Directions for Improving Audio Effectiveness. Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-123 (RTO, Neuilly-sur-Seine
, France
), pp. 1
–14
.4.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (
2005
). “Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry
,” http://www.asha.org/policy (Last accessed March 2, 2011).2.
ANSI
(2007
). American National Standard Mechanical Coupler for Measurement of Bone Vibrators
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
), No. ANSI S3.13-1987 (R2007).3.
ANSI
(2010
). American National Standard: Specification for Audiometers
(Acoustical Society of America
, New York
), No. ANSI S3.6-2010.5.
Barry
, S. J.
, and Vaughan
, R. B.
(1981
). “Loudness balance calibration of bone conduction vibrators
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
24
, 454
–459
.6.
Bauer
, B. B.
, and Torick
, E. L.
(1966
). “Calibration and analysis of underwater earphones by loudness-balance method
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
39
, 35
–39
.7.
Békésy
, G. V.
(1932
). “Zur Theorie des Hörens bei der Schallaufnahme durch Knochenleitung” (“Hearing theory of acoustic perception by bone conduction
”), Ann. Phys.
13
, 111
–136
.8.
Beranek
, L. L.
(1947
). “Design of speech communication systems
,” Proc. Inst. Radio Eng.
45
, 880
–890
.9.
10.
Brinkmann
, K.
, and Richter
, U.
(1989
). “Free-field sensitivity level of audiometric earphones to be used for speech audiometer calibration
,” Scand. Audiol.
18
, 75
–81
.11.
Carlisle
, R. W.
, Pearson
, H. A.
, and Werner
, P. R.
(1947
). “Construction and calibration of an improved bone-conduction receiver for audiometry
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
, 632
–638
12.
Cronbach
, L. J.
(1951
). “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
,” Psychometrika
16
, 297
–334
.13.
Dirks
, D. D.
, Lybarger
, S. F.
, Olsen
, W. O.
, and Billings
, B. L.
(1979
). “Bone conduction calibration: Current status
,” J. Speech Hear. Disord.
44
, 143
–155
.14.
Franks
, J. R.
, Murphy
, W. J.
, Harris
, D. A.
, Johnson
, J. L.
, and Shaw
, P. B.
(2003
). “Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance
,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
64
, 501
–509
.15.
Gripper
, M.
, McBride
, M.
, Osafo-Yeboah
, B.
, and Jiang
, X.
(2007
). “Using the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) to compare the speech intelligibility of air versus bone conduction
,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
37
, 631
–641
.16.
Hedgecock
, L. D.
(1961
). “Clinical calibration of bone-conduction measurements
,” Arch. Otolaryngol.
73
, 186
–195
.17.
Henry
, P.
, and Letowski
, T.
(2007
). Bone Conduction: Anatomy, Physiology, and Communication
(Army Research Laboratory: Aberdeen Proving Ground
, MD
), pp. 1
–192
.18.
IEC
(2007
). Electroacoustics—Simulators of Human Head and Ear—Part 6: Mechanical Coupler for the Measurements on Bone Vibrators
(International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC
, Geneva, Switzerland
), No. IEC 60318-6:2007.19.
IEC
(2010a
). Audiometric Equipment—Part 2: Equipment for Speech Audiometry
(International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC
, Geneva, Switzerland
), No. IEC 60645-2 29/74/CD.20.
IEC
(2010b
). Sound System Equipment—Part 7: Headphones and Earphones
(International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC
, Geneva, Switzerland
), No. IEC 60268-7:2010.21.
ISO
(1994
). Acoustics–Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment–Part 3: Reference Equivalent Threshold Force Levels for Pure Tones and Bone Vibrators
(ISO
, Geneva, Switzerland
), No. ISO 389-3:1994.22.
Kapteyn
, T. S.
, Boezeman
, E. H. J. F.
, and Snel
, A. M.
(1983
). “Bone-conduction measurement and calibration using the cancellation method
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
, 1297
–1299
.23.
Keidser
, G.
, Katsch
, R.
, Dillon
, H.
, and Grant
, F.
(2000
). “Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 3351
–3357
.24.
Margolis
, R. H.
, and Stiepan
, S. M.
(2012
). “Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
, 1221
–1225
.25.
McBride
, M.
, Hodges
, M.
, and French
, J.
(2008a
). “Speech intelligibility differences of male and female vocal signals transmitted through bone conduction in background noise: Implications for voice communication headset design
,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
38
, 1038
–1044
.26.
McBride
, M.
, Letowski
, T.
, and Tran
, P.
(2008b
). “Bone conduction reception: Head sensitivity mapping
,” Ergonomics
51
, 702
–718
.27.
McBride
, M.
, Patrick
, R.
, Letowski
, T.
, and Tran
, P.
(2010
). “Bone conduction intelligibility: Headset comparison study
,” in Proceedings of the Industrial Engineer Research Conference (IERC) (IIE Management Press
, Norcross, GA
), CD ROM.28.
McBride
, M.
, Tran
, P.
, Letowski
, T.
, and Patrick
, R.
(2011
). “The effect of bone conduction microphone locations on speech intelligibility and sound quality
,” Appl. Ergon.
42
, 495
–502
.29.
McKinley
, R. L.
(2009
). “Bone conducted noise and mitigation techniques
,” Report No. AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2009-0061, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH. pp. 1
–14
.30.
Morgan
, D. E.
, and Dirks
, D. D.
(1974
). “Loudness discomfort level under earphone and in the free field: The effects of calibration methods
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
, 172
–178
.31.
Olsen
, W. O.
(1967
). “Artificial mastoid calibration of bone vibrators
,” Arch. Otolaryngol.
85
, 314
–318
.32.
Osafo-Yeboah
, B.
, Jiang
, X.
, McBride
, M.
, Mountjoy
, D.
, and Park
, E.
(2009
). “Using the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) to investigate the impact of background noise, gender, and bone vibrator location on the intelligibility of bone-conducted speech
,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
39
, 246
–254
.33.
Reinfeldt
, S.
, Stenfelt
, S.
, Good
, T.
, and Hakansson
, B.
(2007
). “Examination of bone-conducted transmission from sound field excitation measured by thresholds, ear-canal sound pressure, and skull vibrations
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
, 1576
–1587
.34.
Richter
, U.
, and Brinkmann
, K.
(1976
). “The sensitivity level of bone-conduction receivers
,” J. Audiol. Tech.
15
, 2
–15
.35.
Rimmer
, T. W.
, and Ellenbecker
, M. J.
(1997
). “Hearing protection attenuation measurement by bone conduction loudness balance compared with real-ear attenuation at threshold in a sound field
,” Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg.
12
, 69
–75
.36.
Roach
, R. E.
, and Carhart
, R.
(1956
). “A clinical method for calibrating the bone-conduction audiometer
,” Arch. Otolaryngol.
63
, 270
–278
.37.
Snidecor
, J. C.
, Rehman
, I.
, and Washburn
, D. D.
(1959
). “Speech pickup by contact microphone at head and neck positions
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
2
, 277
–281
.38.
Stanley
, R. M.
, and Walker
, B. N.
(2009
). “Intelligibility of bone-conducted speech at different locations compared to air-conducted speech
,” Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc.
53
, 1086
–1090
.39.
Stenfelt
, S.
(2007
). “Simultaneous cancellation of air and bone conduction tones at two frequencies: Extension of the famous experiment by von Békésy
,” Hear. Sci.
225
, 105
–116
.40.
Stenfelt
, S.
, and Goode
, R. L.
(2005
). “Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: Measurements in cadaver heads
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 2373
–2391
.41.
Stenfelt
, S.
, Wild
, T.
, Hato
, N.
, and Goode
, R. L.
(2003
). “Factors contributing to bone conduction: The outer ear
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 902
–913
.42.
Toll
, L. E.
, Emanuel
, D. C.
, and Letowski
, T.
(2011
). “Effect of static force on bone conduction hearing thresholds and comfort
,” Int. J. Audiol.
50
, 632
–635
.43.
Tran
, P.
, and Letowski
, T.
(2010
). “Speech intelligibility of air conducted and bone conducted speech over radio transmission
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
, 1896
–1896
.44.
Tran
, P.
, Letowski
, T.
, and McBride
, M.
(2008
). “Bone conduction microphone: Head sensitivity mapping for speech intelligibility and sound quality
,” in International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP 2008), Shanghai, China. pp. 107
–111
.45.
Villchur
, E.
(1969
). “Free-field calibration of earphones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
, 1527
–1534
(1969).46.
Walker
, B. N.
, and Stanley
, R. M.
(2005
). “Thresholds of audibility for bone-conduction headsets
,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2005). Limerick, Ireland, pp. 218
–222
.47.
Weece
, R.
, and Allen
, J.
(2010
). “A method for calibration of bone driver transducers to measure the mastoid impedance
,” Hear. Res.
263
, 216
–223
.48.
Wilber
, L. A.
, and Goodhill
, V.
(1967a
). “Electronic calibration of bone-conduction receivers
,” Arch. Otolaryngol.
86
, 431
–434
.49.
Wilber
, L. A.
, and Goodhill
, V.
(1967b
). “Real ear versus artificial mastoid methods of calibration of bone-conduction vibrators
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
10
, 405
–416
.50.
Zera
, J.
, Brammer
, A. J.
, and Pan
, G. J.
(1997
). “Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protector and communication headset attenuation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 3486
–3497
.2013
U.S. Government
You do not currently have access to this content.
