Acoustic simulations were used to study the contributions of spatial hearing that may arise from combining a cochlear implant with either a second implant or contralateral residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in twenty-talker babble. Spatial separation of speech and noise was simulated using a spherical head model. While low-frequency acoustic information contralateral to the implant simulation produced substantially better SRTs there was no effect of spatial cues on SRT, even when interaural differences were artificially enhanced. Simulated bilateral implants showed a significant head shadow effect, but no binaural unmasking based on interaural time differences, and weak, inconsistent overall spatial release from masking. There was also a small but significant non-spatial summation effect. It appears that typical cochlear implant speech processing strategies may substantially reduce the utility of spatial cues, even in the absence of degraded neural processing arising from auditory deprivation.

1.
Arbogast
,
T. L.
,
Mason
,
C. R.
, and
Kidd
,
G.
(
2002
). “
The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
2086
2098
.
2.
Aronoff
,
J. M.
,
Yoon
,
Y. S.
,
Freed
,
D. J.
,
Vermiglio
,
A. J.
,
Pal
,
I.
, and
Soli
,
S. D.
(
2010
). “
The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
EL87
EL92
.
3.
Bench
,
J.
,
Kowal
,
A.
, and
Bamford
,
J.
(
1979
). “
The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
13
,
108
112
.
4.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
(
2000
). “
The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions
,”
Acustica
86
,
117
128
.
5.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1988
). “
The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech-intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
1508
1516
.
6.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1989
). “
Binaural speech-intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
1374
1383
.
7.
Brown
,
C. A.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
2009a
). “
Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone
,”
Ear Hear.
30
,
489
493
.
8.
Brown
,
C. A.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
2009b
). “
Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
1658
1665
.
9.
Brown
,
C. P.
, and
Duda
,
R. O.
(
1998
). “
A structural model for binaural sound synthesis
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Aud. Processing
6
,
476
488
.
10.
Buss
,
E.
,
Pillsbury
,
H. C.
,
Buchman
,
C. A.
,
Pillsbury
,
C. H.
,
Clark
,
M. S.
,
Haynes
,
D. S.
,
Labadie
,
R. F.
,
Amberg
,
S.
,
Roland
,
P. S.
,
Kruger
,
P.
,
Novak
,
M. A.
,
Wirth
,
J. A.
,
Black
,
J. M.
,
Peters
,
R.
,
Lake
,
J.
,
Wackym
,
P. A.
,
Firszt
,
J. B.
,
Wilson
,
B. S.
,
Lawson
,
D. T.
,
Schatzer
,
R.
,
D'Haese
,
P. S. C.
, and
Barco
,
A. L.
(
2008
). “
Multicenter US bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: Speech perception over the first year of use
,”
Ear Hear.
29
,
20
32
.
11.
Chang
,
J. E.
,
Bai
,
J. Y.
, and
Zeng
,
F.-G.
(
2006
). “
Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
53
,
2598
2601
.
12.
Ching
,
T. Y. C.
,
van Wanrooy
,
E.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
2007
). “
Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: A review
,”
Trends Amplif.
11
,
161
192
.
13.
Culling
,
J.
,
Jelfs
,
S.
,
Talbert
,
A.
, and
Backhouse
,
S. S.
(
2011
). “
The overlooked benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation
,”
Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses
,
Pacific Grove
,
CA
.
14.
Dunn
,
C. C.
,
Tyler
,
R. S.
, and
Witt
,
S. A.
(
2005
). “
Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
48
,
668
680
.
15.
Faulkner
,
A.
,
Ball
,
V.
,
Rosen
,
S. R.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Fourcin
,
A. J.
(
1992
). “
Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing-impaired: Speech perception and auditory abilities
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
2136
2155
.
16.
Faulkner
,
A.
,
Rosen
,
S.
, and
Green
,
T.
(
2012
). “
Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
EL336
342
.
17.
Firszt
,
J. B.
,
Reeder
,
R. M.
, and
Skinner
,
M. W.
(
2008
). “
Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid
,”
J. Rehab. Res. Dev.
45
,
749
767
.
18.
Francart
,
T.
,
Brokx
,
J.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2008
). “
Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation
,”
Audiol. Neurootol.
13
,
309
319
.
19.
Francart
,
T.
,
Brokx
,
J.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2009b
). “
Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
10
,
131
141
.
20.
Francart
,
T.
,
Lenssen
,
A.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2011
). “
Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
,
2817
2826
.
21.
Francart
,
T.
,
Van den Bogaert
,
T.
,
Moonen
,
M.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2009a
). “
Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
3209
3213
.
22.
Friesen
,
L. M.
,
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Baskent
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
X.
(
2001
). “
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1150
1163
.
23.
Garadat
,
S. N.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
,
Yu
,
G. Q.
, and
Zeng
,
F.-G.
(
2009
). “
Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
2522
2535
.
24.
Grantham
,
D. W.
,
Ashmead
,
D. H.
,
Ricketts
,
T. A.
,
Haynes
,
D. S.
, and
Labadie
,
R. F.
(
2008
). “
Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS plus processing
,”
Ear Hear.
29
,
33
44
.
25.
Greenwood
,
D. D.
(
1990
). “
A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
2592
2605
.
26.
Hawley
,
M. L.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Culling
,
J. F.
(
2004
). “
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
833
843
.
27.
Henning
,
G. B.
(
1974
). “
Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
55
,
84
90
.
28.
Kong
,
Y. Y.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2007
). “
Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
3717
3727
.
29.
Kong
,
Y. Y.
,
Stickney
,
G. S.
, and
Zeng
,
F.-G.
(
2005
). “
Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
1351
1361
.
30.
Laback
,
B.
,
Pok
,
S. M.
,
Baumgartner
,
W. D.
,
Deutsch
,
W. A.
, and
Schmid
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
488
500
.
31.
Li
,
N.
, and
Loizou
,
P. C.
(
2008
). “
A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
2287
2294
.
32.
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
,
Jones
,
G. L.
,
Agrawal
,
S.
, and
van Hoesel
,
R.
(
2010
). “
Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
400
414
.
33.
Loizou
,
P. C.
,
Hu
,
Y.
,
Litovsky
,
R.
,
Yu
,
G. Q.
,
Peters
,
R.
,
Lake
,
J.
, and
Roland
,
P.
(
2009
). “
Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
372
383
.
34.
Long
,
C. J.
,
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Downs
,
D. H.
(
2006
). “
Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
7
,
352
360
.
35.
Lu
,
T.
,
Litovsky
,
R.
, and
Zeng
,
F.-G.
(
2010
). “
Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
1479
1490
.
36.
MacLeod
,
A.
, and
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
(
1990
). “
A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
24
,
29
43
.
37.
McDermott
,
H. J.
,
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
Vandali
,
A. E.
(
1992
). “
A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
3367
3371
.
38.
McFadden
,
D.
, and
Pasanen
,
E. G.
(
1976
). “
Lateralization at high-frequencies based on interaural time differences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
,
634
639
.
39.
Morera
,
C.
,
Manrique
,
M.
,
Ramos
,
A.
,
Garcia-Ibanez
,
L.
,
Cavalle
,
L.
,
Huarte
,
A.
,
Castillo
,
C.
, and
Estrada
,
E.
(
2005
). “
Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: A 6-month comparative study
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
125
,
596
606
.
40.
Plomp
,
R.
, and
Mimpen
,
A. M.
(
1979
). “
Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
1333
1342
.
41.
Quené
,
H.
, and
van den Bergh
,
H.
(
2004
). “
On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial
,”
Speech Commun.
43
,
103
121
.
42.
Schleich
,
P.
,
Nopp
,
P.
, and
D'Haese
,
P.
(
2004
). “
Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+cochlear implant
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
197
204
.
43.
Seeber
,
B. U.
, and
Fastl
,
H.
(
2008
). “
Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
1030
1042
.
44.
Seeber
,
B. U.
, and
Hafter
,
E. R.
(
2011
). “
Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
1509
1521
.
45.
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Zeng
,
F.-G.
,
Kamath
,
V.
,
Wygonski
,
J.
, and
Ekelid
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues
,”
Science
270
,
303
304
.
46.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
(
2008
). “
Object-based auditory and visual attention
,”
Trends Cogn. Sci.
12
,
182
186
.
47.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Held
,
R. M.
(
1998
). “
Adapting to supernormal auditory localization cues. I. Bias and resolution
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3656
3666
.
48.
Souza
,
P.
, and
Rosen
,
S.
(
2009
). “
Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
792
805
.
49.
Stacey
,
P. C.
, and
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
(
2007
). “
Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2923
2935
.
50.
Stellmack
,
M. A.
,
Viemeister
,
N. F.
, and
Byrne
,
A. J.
(
2005
). “
Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
2507
2518
.
51.
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
(
2007
). “
Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2192
2206
.
52.
van Hoesel
,
R.
,
Bohm
,
M.
,
Pesch
,
J.
,
Vandali
,
A.
,
Battmer
,
R. D.
, and
Lenarz
,
T.
(
2008
). “
Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
2249
2263
.
53.
van Hoesel
,
R. J. M.
, and
Tyler
,
R. S.
(
2003
). “
Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1617
1630
.
54.
Versfeld
,
N. J.
,
Daalder
,
L.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2000
). “
Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
1671
1684
.
55.
Zhang
,
T.
,
Dorman
,
M. F.
, and
Spahr
,
A. J.
(
2010
). “
Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation
,”
Ear Hear.
31
,
63
69
.
56.
Zurek
,
P. M.
(
1993
). “
Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility
,” in
Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance
, edited by
G. A.
Studebaker
and
I.
Hochberg
(
Allyn and Bacon
,
Boston
), pp.
255
276
.
You do not currently have access to this content.