This investigation examined perceptual learning of dysarthric speech. Forty listeners were randomly assigned to one of two identification training tasks, aimed at highlighting either the linguistic (word identification task) or indexical (speaker identification task) properties of the neurologically degraded signal. Twenty additional listeners served as a control group, passively exposed to the training stimuli. Immediately following exposure to dysarthric speech, all three listener groups completed an identical phrase transcription task. Analysis of listener transcripts revealed remarkably similar intelligibility improvements for listeners trained to attend to either the linguistic or the indexical properties of the signal. Perceptual learning effects were also evaluated with regards to underlying error patterns indicative of segmental and suprasegmental processing. The findings of this study suggest that elements within both the linguistic and indexical properties of the dysarthric signal are learnable and interact to promote improved processing of this type and severity of speech degradation. Thus, the current study extends support for the development of a model of perceptual processing in which the learning of indexical properties is encoded and retained in conjunction with linguistic properties of the signal.

1.
Borrie
,
S. A.
,
McAuliffe
,
M. J.
, and
Liss
,
J. M.
(
2012a
). “
Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
55
,
290
305
.
2.
Borrie
,
S. A.
,
McAuliffe
,
M. J.
,
Liss
,
J. M.
,
Kirk
,
C.
,
O'Beirne
,
G. A.
, and
Anderson
,
T.
(
2012b
). “
Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthic speech
,”
Lang. Cogn. Process.
27
,
1039
1055
.
3.
Borrie
,
S. A.
,
McAuliffe
,
M. J.
,
Liss
,
J. M.
,
O'Beirne
,
G. A.
, and
Anderson
,
T.
(
2012c
). “
A follow-up investigation into the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
EL102
EL108
.
4.
Brown
,
J.
, and
Carr
,
T.
(
1993
). “
Limits on perceptual abstraction in reading: Asymmetric transfer between surface forms differing in typicality
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
19
,
1277
1296
.
5.
Costanzo
,
F. S.
,
Markel
,
N. N.
, and
Costanzo
,
P. R.
(
1989
). “
Voice quality profile and perceived emotion
,”
J. Counsel. Psychol.
16
,
267
270
.
6.
Creelman
,
C. D.
(
1957
). “
The case of the unknown talker
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
29
,
655
.
7.
Cutler
,
A.
, and
Butterfield
,
S.
(
1992
). “
Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
31
,
218
236
.
51.
Cutler
,
A
., and
Norris
,
D. G.
(
1988
). “
The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
14
,
113
121
.
9.
Eisner
,
F.
, and
McQueen
,
J. M.
(
2005
). “
The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
67
(
2
),
224
238
.
10.
Fairbanks
,
G.
(
1960
).
Voice and Articulation Drillbook
, 2nd ed. (
Harper and Row
,
New York
), p.
234
.
11.
Francis
,
A. L.
,
Nusbaum
,
H. C.
, and
Fenn
,
K.
(
2007
). “
Effects of training on the acoustic-phonetic representation of synthetic speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
1445
1465
.
12.
Goldinger
,
S. D.
(
1996
). “
Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
22
,
1166
1183
.
13.
Goldinger
,
S. D.
(
1998
). “
Echoes of echoes?: An episodic theory of lexical access
,”
Psychol. Rev.
105
,
251
279
.
14.
Goldinger
,
S. D.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Logan
,
J. S.
(
1991
). “
On the nature of talker variability effects of spoken word lists
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
17
,
152
162
.
15.
Greenspan
,
S. L.
,
Nusbaum
,
H. C.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1988
). “
Perceptual learning of synthetic speech
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn.
14
(
3
),
421
433
.
16.
Hagiwara
,
R.
(
1997
). “
Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
655
658
.
17.
Halle
,
M.
(
1985
). “
Speculations about the representation of words in memory
,” in
Phonetic Linguistics
, edited by
V. A.
Fromkin
(
Academic
,
New York
), pp.
101
104
.
18.
Hillenbrand
,
J.
,
Getty
,
L. A.
,
Clark
,
M. J.
, and
Wheeler
,
K.
(
1995
). “
Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3099
3111
.
48.
Johnson
,
K.
(
1997
). “
Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar mode
,” in
Talker Variability in Speech Processing
, edited by
K.
Johnson
and
J. W.
Mullennix
(
Academic Press
,
San Diego, CA
), pp.
145
165
.
49.
Johnson
,
K.
(
2006
). “
Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology
,”
J. Phonetics
34
,
485
499
.
19.
Joos
,
M. A.
(
1948
). “
Acoustic phonetics
,”
Lang. Monogr.
23
(
23
),
136
.
20.
Jusczyk
,
P. W.
, and
Luce
,
P. A.
(
2002
). “
Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Past and present
,”
Ear Hear.
23
,
2
40
.
21.
Kirk
,
K. I.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, and
Miyamoto
,
R. C.
(
1997
). “
Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
40
,
1395
1405
.
22.
Knuth
,
D. E.
(
1998
).
The Art of Computer Programming
, 3rd ed. (
Addison–Wesley
,
Boston, MA
), Vol.
2
, pp.
145
146
.
50.
Ladefoged
,
P.
, and
Broadbent
,
D. E.
(
1957
). “
Information conveyed by vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
29
,
98
104
.
23.
Levi
,
S. V.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2007
). “
Indexical and linguistic channels in speech perception: Some effects of voiceovers on advertising outcomes
,” in
Psycholinguistics Phenomena in Marketing Communications
, edited by
T. M.
Lowrey
(
Lawrence Erlbaum
,
Mahwah, NJ
), pp.
203
219
.
24.
Liss
,
J. M.
,
Spitzer
,
S. M.
,
Caviness
,
J. N.
, and
Adler
,
C.
(
2002
). “
The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(
6
),
3022
3030
.
25.
Liss
,
J. M.
,
Spitzer
,
S. M.
,
Caviness
,
J. N.
,
Adler
,
C.
, and
Edwards
,
B.
(
1998
). “
Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
(
4
),
2457
2466
.
26.
Loebach
,
J. L.
,
Bent
,
T.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
2008
). “
Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
1
),
552
561
.
27.
Luce
,
P. A.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1998
). “
Recognizing spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model
,”
Ear Hear.
19
,
1
36
.
28.
Mattys
,
S. L.
, and
Liss
,
J. M.
(
2008
). “
On building models of spoken-word recognition: When there is as much to learn from natural ‘oddities' as artificial normality
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
70
(
7
),
1235
1242
.
30.
Morton
,
J.
(
1969
). “
Interaction of information in word recognition
,”
Psychol. Rev.
76
,
165
178
.
31.
Mullennix
,
J. W.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1990
). “
Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
47
,
379
390
.
32.
Munson
,
B.
,
McDonald
,
E. C.
,
DeBoe
,
N. L.
, and
White
,
A. R.
(
2006
). “
The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech
,”
J. Phonet.
34
,
202
240
.
33.
Murry
,
I. R.
, and
Arnott
,
J. L.
(
1993
). “
Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
1097
1108
.
34.
Norris
,
D.
(
1994
). “
Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition
,”
Cognition
52
,
189
234
.
35.
Nygaard
,
L. C.
(
2008
). “
Perceptual integration of linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech
,” in
The Handbook of Speech Perception
, edited by
D. B.
Pisoni
and
R. E.
Remez
(
Blackwell
,
Malden, MA
), pp.
390
413
.
36.
Nygaard
,
L. C.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1998
). “
Talker-specific learning in speech perception
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
60
,
355
376
.
37.
Nygaard
,
L. C.
,
Sommers
,
M. S.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1994
). “
Speech perception as a talker-contingent process
,”
Psychol. Sci.
5
,
42
46
.
38.
Palmeri
,
T. J.
,
Goldinger
,
S. D.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1993
). “
Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words and voices
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
18
,
915
930
.
39.
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1997
). “
Some thoughts on ‘normalization' in speech perception
,” in
Talker Variability in Speech Processing
, edited by
K.
Johnson
and
J. W.
Mullennix
(
Academic
,
San Diego, CA
), pp.
9
32
.
40.
Ryalls
,
B. O.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1997
). “
The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children
,”
Dev. Psychol.
33
(
3
),
441
452
.
41.
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Zeng
,
F. G.
,
Kamath
,
V.
,
Wygonski
,
J.
, and
Ekelid
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition with primary temporal cues
,”
Science
62
(
4
),
834
842
.
42.
Studebaker
,
G. A.
(
1985
). “
A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
28
,
455
462
.
43.
Summerfield
,
Q.
,
Haggard
,
M.
,
Foster
,
J.
, and
Gray
,
S.
(
1984
). “
Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory after effect
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
35
,
203
213
.
44.
Szakay
,
A.
,
Babel
,
M.
, and
King
,
J.
(
2012
). “
Sociophonetic markers facilitate translation priming: Maori English GOAT – A different kind of animal
,”
University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics
18
(
2
), Article 16, http://repository/upenn.edu/pwpl/vol18/iss2/16.
45.
Tenpenny
,
P. L.
(
1995
). “
Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition, priming and word identification
,”
Psychonom. Bull. Rev.
2
,
339
363
.
46.
Yohan
,
C. A.
, and
Sommers
,
M. S.
(
2000
). “
The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older adults
,”
Psychol. Aging
15
,
88
99
.
47.
Yorkston
,
K. M.
,
Beukelman
,
D. R.
, and
Hakel
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Speech intelligibility test for windows
,” Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital, Lincoln, NE.
You do not currently have access to this content.