It is well documented that the interference of noise in the classroom puts younger pupils at a disadvantage for speech perception tasks. Nevertheless, the dependence of this phenomenon on the type of noise, and the way it is realized for each class by a specific combination of intelligibility and effort have not been fully investigated. Following on a previous laboratory study on “listening efficiency,” which stems from a combination of accuracy and latency measures, this work tackles the problems above to better understand the basic mechanisms governing the speech perception performance of pupils in noisy classrooms. Listening tests were conducted in real classrooms for a relevant number of students, and tests in quiet were also developed. The statistical analysis is based on stochastic ordering and is able to clarify the behavior of the classes and the different impacts of noises on performance. It is found that the joint babble and activity noise has the worst effect on performance whereas tapping and external traffic noises are less disruptive.

1.
K.
Anderson
, “
The problem of classroom acoustics: The typical classroom soundscape is a barrier to learning
,”
Semin. Hear.
25
,
117
129
(
2004
).
2.
M.
Picard
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Revisiting speech interference in classrooms
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
40
,
221
244
(
2001
).
3.
W.
Yang
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
922
933
(
2009
).
4.
J. S.
Bradley
and
H.
Sato
, “
The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
2078
2086
(
2008
).
5.
A.
Astolfi
,
P.
Bottalico
, and
G.
Barbato
, “
Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
247
257
(
2012
).
6.
J. E.
Dockrell
and
B. M.
Shield
, “
Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom
Brit. Educ. Res. J.
32
,
509
525
(
2006
).
7.
J. E.
Dockrell
and
B. M.
Shield
, “
The effects of noise on children at school: A review
,”
Build. Acoust.
10
,
97
116
(
2003
).
8.
M.
Klatte
,
M.
Meis
,
H.
Sukowski
, and
A.
Schick
, “
Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children
,”
Noise Health
9
,
64
74
(
2007
).
9.
M.
Klatte
,
T.
Lachmann
, and
M.
Meis
, “
Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting
,”
Noise Health
12
,
270
282
(
2010
).
10.
D. L.
Valente
,
H. M.
Plevinsky
,
J. M.
Franco
,
E. C.
Heinrichs-Graham
, and
D. E.
Lewis
, “
Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
131
,
232
246
(
2012
).
11.
N.
Prodi
,
C.
Visentin
, and
A.
Farnetani
, “
Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
172
181
(
2010
).
12.
D. W.
Massaro
, “
Preperceptual images, processing times and perceptual units in auditory perception
,”
Psychol. Rev.
79
,
124
145
(
1972
).
13.
EN60268-16:2011:
Sound System Equipment — Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index
(
European Committee for Standardization
,
Genève
,
2011
).
14.
Aurora site, http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/AuroraP/STI.htm (last viewed September 18,
2012
).
15.
F.
Cutugno
,
S.
Prosser
, and
M.
Turrini
,
Audiometria Vocale
(Vocal Audiometry) (
GN ReSound Italia
,
Padova
,
2000
), Vol.
I
.
16.
W. A.
Dreschler
,
H.
Verschuure
,
C.
Ludvigsen
, and
S.
Westermann
, “
ICRA (International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology) noises: Artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment
,”
Audiology
40
,
148
157
(
2001
).
17.
M. R.
Schroeder
, “
Reference signal for signal quality studies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
44
,
1735
1736
(
1968
).
18.
ISO9921:2003:
Ergonomics: Assessment of Speech Communication
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Genève
,
2003
).
19.
E.
Arslan
,
E.
Genovese
,
E.
Orzan
, and
M.
Turrini
, “Valutazione della percezione verbale nel bambino ipoacusico: Test di Identificazione di Parole Infantili 1-2” (“Evaluation of the verbal perception in hearing-impaired children: Infant Words Identification Test 1-2”), Ecumenica, Bari,
1997
.
20.
M.
Turrini
,
F.
Cutugno
,
P.
Maturi
,
S.
Prosser
,
F.
Albano Leoni
, and
E.
Arslan
, “
Nuove parole bisillabiche per audiometria vocale in lingua italiana
” (“New bisyllabic words for vocal audiometry in the Italian language”),
Acta Otorhinol. Ital.
13
,
63
77
(
1993
).
21.
P.
Bonaventura
,
A.
Paoloni
,
F.
Canavesio
, and
P.
Usai
, “
Realizzazione di un test diagnostico di intelligibilità per la lingua italiana
” (“Development of a diagnostic intelligibility test in the Italian language”), Internal Technical Report No. 3C1286, Fondazione Ugo Bordoni, Rome,
1986
.
22.
N.
Prodi
,
C.
Visentin
, and
C.
Bellettini
, “
Listening efficiency testing
,” in
45th AES Conference Proceedings
,
Helsinki
,
Finland
(March 1–4,
2012
).
23.
F.
Pesarin
and
L.
Salmaso
,
Permutation Tests for Complex Data. Theory, Applications and Software
(
Wiley
,
Chichester
,
2010
), Chaps. 1–7.
24.
S.
Bonnini
,
N.
Prodi
,
L.
Salmaso
, and
C.
Visentin
, “Permutation approaches for stochastic orderings,” Technical Report: Department of Economics & Management, University of Ferrara,
2012
.
25.
R-project site, www.r-project.com (last viewed October 30,
2011
).
26.
N.
Prodi
,
C.
Visentin
, and
A.
Feletti
Statistical ordering of class grades and noise interference in primary school classrooms
,” Technical Report: ENDIF, University of Ferrara,
2012
, http://acustica.ing.unife.it/reports.htm (last viewed June 20, 2012).
27.
G.
Matthews
,
D.
Roy Davies
,
S. J.
Westermann
, and
R. B.
Stammers
, Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences (Psychology Press, East Sussex,
2000
), Chaps.
9
12
.
28.
A. C.
Neuman
,
I.
Hochberg
,
H.
Thomas
, and
I.
John
, “
Children's perception of speech in reverberation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
2145
2149
(
1983
).
29.
M.
Fallon
,
S. E.
Trehub
, and
B. A.
Schneider
, “
Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
3023
3029
(
2000
).
30.
B. R.
Slater
, “
Effects of noise on pupils performance
,”
J. Educ. Psychol.
59
,
239
243
(
1968
).
31.
A. P.
Smith
, “
The effects of different types of noise on semantic processing and syntactic reasoning
,”
Acta Psychol.
58
,
263
273
(
1985
).
32.
M.
Fallon
,
S. E.
Trehub
, and
B. A.
Schneider
, “
Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
2242
2249
(
2002
).
You do not currently have access to this content.