The ability of a receiver to detect a signal is a product of the signal characteristics at the sender, habitat-specific degradation of the signal, and properties of the receiver's sensory system. Active space describes the maximum distance at which a receiver with a given sensory system can detect a signal in a given habitat. Here the effect of habitat structure and urbanization on brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) perched song active space was explored. The active space of the cowbird song was affected by both habitat type and level of urbanization. High frequency (4 to 6 kHz) portions of song resulted in the maximum active space. Surprisingly, the active space was the largest in open urban environments. The hard surfaces found in open urban areas (e.g., sidewalks, buildings) may provide a sound channel that enhances song propagation. When the introductory phrase and final phrase were analyzed separately, the active space of the introductory phrase was found to decrease in open urban environments but the active space of the final phrase increased in open urban environments. This suggests that different portions of the vocalization may be differentially influenced by habitat and level of urbanization.

1.
Blumenrath
,
S. H.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
2004
). “
Degradation of great tit (Parus major) song before and after foliation: Implications for vocal communication in a deciduous forest
,”
Behavior
141
,
935
958
.
2.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 5.1.07. Computer program retrieved May 7, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/.
3.
Boncoraglio
,
G.
, and
Saino
,
N.
(
2007
). “
Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis
,”
Funct. Ecol.
21
,
134
142
.
4.
Bradbury
,
J. W.
, and
Vehrencamp
,
S. L.
(
1998
).
Principles of Animal Communication
(
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
,
MA
,), pp.
1
173
.
5.
Brenowitz
,
E. A.
(
1982
). “
The active space of red-winged blackbird song
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A
147
,
511
522
.
6.
Brumm
,
H.
, and
Naguib
,
M.
(
2009
). “
Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song
,”
Adv. Study Behav.
40
,
1
33
.
7.
Caras
,
M. L.
,
Brenowitz
,
E. A.
, and
Rubel
,
E. W.
(
2010
). “
Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A
196
,
581
599
.
8.
Cardoso
,
G. C.
, and
Atwell
,
J. W.
(
2011
). “
On the relation between loudness and increased song frequency of urban birds
,”
Anim. Behav.
82
,
831
836
.
9.
Darley
,
J. A.
(
1982
). “
Territorality and mating-behavior of the male brown-headed cowbird
,”
Condor
84
,
15
21
.
10.
Dooling
,
R. J.
,
Lohr
,
B.
, and
Dent
,
M. L.
(
2000
). “
Hearing in birds and reptiles
,” in
Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles
, edited by
R. J.
Dooling
,
A. N.
Popper
, and
R. R.
Fay
(
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
), pp.
308
359
.
11.
Dufty
,
A. M.
, Jr.
(
1982
). “
Movements and activities of radio-tracked brown-headed cowbirds
,”
Auk
99
,
316
327
.
12.
Forsman
,
J. T.
, and
Martin
,
T. E.
(
2009
). “
Habitat selection for parasitic-free space by hosts of parasitic cowbirds
,”
Oikos
118
,
464
470
.
13.
Francis
,
C. D.
,
Ortega
,
C. P.
, and
Cruz
,
A.
(
2011a
). “
Vocal frequency change reflects different response to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
278
,
2025
2031
.
14.
Francis
,
C. D.
,
Ortega
,
C. P.
, and
Cruz
,
A.
(
2011b
). “
Different behavioral responses to anthropogenic noise by two closely related passerine birds
,”
Biol. Lett.
7
,
850
852
.
15.
Friedmann
,
H.
(
1929
).
The Cowbirds: A Study in the Biology of Social Parasitism
(
C. C. Thomas
,
Springfield, IL
), pp.
1
273
.
16.
Gall
,
M. D.
,
Brierley
,
L. E.
, and
Lucas
,
J. R.
(
2011
). “
Species and sex effects on auditory processing in brown-headed cowbirds and red-winged blackbirds
,”
Anim. Behav.
81
,
973
982
.
17.
Gall
,
M. D.
, and
Lucas
,
J. R.
(
2010
). “
Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A.
196
,
559
567
.
18.
Hanna
,
D.
,
Blouin-Demers
,
G.
,
Wilson
,
D. R.
, and
Mennill
,
D. J.
(
2011
). “
Anthropogenic noise affects song structure in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus)
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
214
,
3549
3556
.
19.
Henry
,
K. S.
, and
Lucas
,
J. R.
(
2008
). “
Coevolution of auditory sensitivity and temporal resolution with acoustic space in three songbirds
,”
Anim. Behav.
76
,
1659
1671
.
20.
Henry
,
K. S.
, and
Lucas
,
J. R.
(
2010a
). “
Auditory sensitivity and the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in the Carolina chickadee, Poecile carolinenis
,”
Anim. Behav.
80
,
497
507
.
21.
Henry
,
K. S.
, and
Lucas
,
J. R.
(
2010b
). “
Habitat-related differences in the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in songbirds
,”
Funct. Ecol.
24
,
614
624
.
22.
Hienz
,
J. D.
, and
Sachs
,
M. B.
(
1987
). “
Effects of noise on pure-tone thresholds in blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus and Molothrus ater) and pigeons (Columba livia)
,”
J. Comp., Psych.
101
,
16
24
.
23.
Hienz
,
J. D.
,
Sinnott
,
J. M.
, and
Sachs
,
M. B.
(
1977
). “
Auditory sensitivity of the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) and the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater)
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
91
,
1365
1376
.
24.
Hunter
,
M. L.
, and
Krebs
,
J. R.
(
1979
). “
Geographical variation in the song of the Great Tit, Parus major, in relation to ecological factors
,”
J. Anim. Ecol.
48
,
759
785
.
25.
King
,
A. P.
,
West
,
M. J.
,
Eastzer
,
D. H.
, and
Staddon
,
J. E. R.
(
1981
). “
An experimental investigation of the bioacoustics of cowbird song
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
9
,
211
217
.
26.
Klump
,
G. M.
, and
Nieder
,
A.
(
2001
). “
Release from masking in fluctuating background noise in a songbird's auditory forebrain
,”
NeuroReport.
12
,
1825
1829
.
27.
Langemann
,
U.
, and
Klump
,
G. M.
(
2006
). “
Asymmetry of masking in the European starling: Behavioral auditory thresholds
,”
Hear. Res.
221
,
26
35
.
28.
Langemann
,
U.
,
Klump
,
G. M.
, and
Dooling
,
R. J.
(
1995
). “
Critical bands and critical-ratio bandwidth in the European starling
,”
Hear. Res.
84
,
167
176
.
29.
Lohr
,
B.
,
Wright
,
T.
, and
Dooling
,
R. J.
(
2003
). “
Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: Estimating the active space of a signal
,”
Anim. Behav.
65
,
763
777
.
30.
Lowther
,
P. E.
(
1993
). “
Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater)
,”
The Birds of North America Online
(
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
). Available via
the Birds of North America Online
: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/047 doi:10.2173/bna.47 (Last viewed 3/5/2012).
31.
Lucas
,
J. R.
,
Freeberg
,
T. M.
,
Long
,
G. R.
, and
Krishnan
,
A.
(
2007
). “
Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: A comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A.
193
,
201
215
.
32.
Marten
,
K.
, and
Marler
,
P.
(
1977
). “
Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization: I. Temperate habitats
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
2
,
271
290
.
33.
Mockford
,
E. J.
, and
Marshall
,
R. C.
(
2009
). “
Effects of urban noise on song and response behavior in great tits
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
1669
,
2979
2985
.
34.
Mockford
,
E. J.
,
Marshall
,
R. C.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
2011
). “
Degradation of rural and urban great tit song: Testing transmission efficiency
,”
PLoS ONE
6
,
e28242
.
35.
Morton
,
E. S.
(
1975
). “
Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds
,”
Am. Nat.
109
,
17
43
.
36.
Nemeth
,
E.
, and
Brumm
,
H.
(
2010
). “
Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive?
Am. Nat.
176
,
465
475
.
37.
Nemeth
,
E.
,
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Pedersen
,
S. B.
, and
Winkler
,
H.
(
2006
). “
Rainforests as concert halls for birds: Are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
620
626
.
38.
Noirot
,
I. C.
,
Brittan–Powell
,
E. F.
, and
Dooling
,
R. J.
(
2011
). “
Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
3445
3448
.
39.
Pohl
,
N. U.
,
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
,
Klump
,
G. M.
, and
Langemann
,
U.
(
2009
). “
Effects of signal features and environmental noise on signal detection in the great tit, Parus major
,”
Anim. Behav.
78
,
1293
1300
.
40.
Ripmeester
,
E. A. P.
,
Kok
,
J. S.
,
Van Rijssel
,
J. C.
, and
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
(
2010
). “
Habitat related birdsong divergence: A multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
64
,
409
418
.
41.
Rothstein
,
S. I.
,
Verner
,
J.
, and
Stephens
,
E.
(
1984
). “
Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird
,”
Ecology
65
,
77
88
.
42.
Rothstein
,
S. I.
,
Yokel
,
D. A.
, and
Fleischer
,
R. C.
(
1986
). “
Social dominance, mating and spacing systems, female fecundity, and vocal dialects in captive and free-ranging brown-headed cowbirds
,”
Curr. Ornithol.
3
,
127
185
.
43.
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
(
2004
). “
Habitat-dependent ambient noise: Consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
3727
3733
.
44.
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
,
Ellers
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
T. B.
(
2002
). “
Birdsong and sound transmission: The benefits of reverberation
,”
Condor
104
,
564
573
.
45.
Slabbekoorn
,
H.
, and
Ripmeester
,
E. A. P.
(
2007
). “
Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation
,”
Mol. Ecol.
17
,
72
83
.
46.
Smith
,
J. N. M.
,
Cook
,
T. L.
,
Rothstein
,
S. I.
,
Robinson
,
S. K.
, and
Sealy
,
S. G.
(
2000
).
Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and their Hosts
(
University of Texas Press
,
Austin, TX
), pp.
1
388
.
47.
Thompson
,
F. R.
, and
Dijak
,
W. D.
(
2000
). “
Differences in movements, home range, and habitat preferences of female brown-headed cowbirds in three midwestern landscapes
,” in
Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and their Hosts
, edited by
J. N. M.
Smith
,
T. L.
Cook
,
S. I.
Rothstein
,
S. K.
Robinson
, and
S. G.
Sealy
(
University of Texas Press
,
Austin, TX
), pp.
100
109
.
48.
US Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Census: Indiana Profile. http://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10_thematic/2010_Profile/2010_Profile_Map_Indiana.pdf (Last viewed 1/19/2012).
49.
West
,
M. J.
,
King
,
A. P.
,
Eastzer
,
D. H.
, and
Staddon
,
J. E. R.
(
1979
). “
Bioassay of isolate cowbird song
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
93
,
124
133
.
50.
Wiley
,
R. H.
, and
Richards
,
D. G.
(
1978
). “
Physical constraints on acoustic communication in atmosphere: Implications for evolution of animal vocalizations
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
3
,
69
94
.
51.
Witte
,
K.
,
Harris
,
H. E.
,
Ryan
,
M. J.
, and
Wilczynski
,
W.
(
2005
). “
How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: Evidence for environmental selection on tuning
,”
Behav. Ecol.
16
,
571
579
.
52.
Wright
,
T. F.
,
Cortopassi
,
K. A.
,
Bradbury
,
J. W.
, and
Dooling
,
R. J.
(
2003
). “
Hearing and vocalizations in the orange-fronted conure (Aratinga canicularis)
,”
J. Comp. Psychol.
117
,
87
95
.
You do not currently have access to this content.