It is hypothesized that older listeners are more likely than younger listeners to be impaired when asked to make intensity judgments about target tones embedded in rapidly presented auditory sequences. This study examined this hypothesis by asking listeners ranging in age from 19 to 74 yr to make judgments of intensity based on narrowband noise bursts varying in frequency and intensity. In two experiments, listeners made intensity judgments of target bursts alone or embedded in sequences of bursts. In the first experiment, one of four fixed sequences was presented and had to be identified. In the second experiment, pre- or post-trial bursts acted as cues that identified the frequency of the target burst in the sequence. In both experiments, intensity discrimination thresholds for single bursts were good predictors of performance with sequences and were little affected by age. Significant negative relationships between age and accuracy were observed when single sequences had to be identified or a post-trial cue was used, but no age effects were apparent when a pre-trial cue was used. These data are interpreted as being consistent with previous suggestions that the aging process results in a decline in auditory memory capacity and/or internally generated selective attention.
Impacts of age on memory for auditory intensitya)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Also at: Dept. of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Present address: Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 N.E. 42nd St., Seattle, WA 98105.
Present address: Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Park Hall 337, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Portions of this work were presented at the 32nd and 33rd Midwinter Meetings of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
Frederick J. Gallun, Anna C. Diedesch, Robertson Beasley; Impacts of age on memory for auditory intensity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2012; 132 (2): 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4731235
Download citation file: