Dynamic-range compression (DRC) is used in the music industry to maximize loudness. The amount of compression applied to commercial recordings has increased over time due to a motivating perspective that louder music is always preferred. In contrast to this viewpoint, artists and consumers have argued that using large amounts of DRC negatively affects the quality of music. However, little research evidence has supported the claims of either position. The present study investigated how DRC affects the perceived loudness and sound quality of recorded music. Rock and classical music samples were peak-normalized and then processed using different amounts of DRC. Normal-hearing listeners rated the processed and unprocessed samples on overall loudness, dynamic range, pleasantness, and preference, using a scaled paired-comparison procedure in two conditions: un-equalized, in which the loudness of the music samples varied, and loudness-equalized, in which loudness differences were minimized. Results indicated that a small amount of compression was preferred in the un-equalized condition, but the highest levels of compression were generally detrimental to quality, whether loudness was equalized or varied. These findings are contrary to the “louder is better” mentality in the music industry and suggest that more conservative use of DRC may be preferred for commercial music.

1.
Arehart
,
K. H.
,
Kates
,
J. M.
, and
Anderson
,
M. C.
(
2011
). “
Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
50
,
177
190
.
2.
Balfour
,
P. B.
, and
Hawkins
,
D. B.
(
1992
). “
A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing-aid processed stimuli
,”
Ear Hear.
13
,
331
339
.
3.
Bhatara
,
A.
,
Tirovolas
,
A. K.
,
Duan
,
L. M.
,
Levy
,
B.
, and
Levitin
,
D. J.
(
2011
). “
Perception of emotional expression in musical performance
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
37
,
921
934
.
4.
Bregitzer
,
L
. (
2009
).
Secrets of Recording: Professional Tips, Tools & Techniques
(
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
), Chap. 7–8, pp.
155
209
.
5.
Dahlquist
,
M.
, and
Leijon
,
A.
(
2003
). “
Paired-comparison rating of sound quality using MAP parameter estimation for data analysis
,” in
First ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Auditory Quality of Systems
, Akademie Mont-Cenis, Germany (April 23–25, 2003), ISCA Archive http://www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/aqs2003 (Last viewed April 6, 2012), pp.
79
84
.
6.
Davies-Venn
,
E.
,
Souza
,
P.
, and
Fabry
,
D.
(
2007
). “
Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
18
,
688
699
.
7.
Dillon
,
H.
(
1984
). “
A procedure for subjective quality rating of hearing aids
,” NAL Report No. 100, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
8.
Gabrielsson
,
A.
, and
Sjogren
,
H.
(
1979
). “
Perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
65
,
1019
1033
.
9.
Geringer
,
J. M
. (
1995
). “
Continuous loudness judgments of dynamics in recorded music excerpts
,”
J. Res. Mus. Ed
.
43
,
22
35
.
10.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2002
). “
A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
50
,
331
342
.
11.
Jenstad
,
L. M.
, and
Souza
,
P. E.
(
2005
). “
Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
48
,
651
667
.
12.
Kates
,
J. M.
(
2010
). “
Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
49
,
395
409
.
13.
Kates
,
J. M.
, and
Arehart
,
K. H.
(
2010
). “
The hearing-aid speech quality index (HASQI)
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
58
,
363
381
.
14.
Katz
,
B
. (
2007
).
Mastering Audio: The Art and the Science
(
Focal Press
,
Amsterdam
), pp. 121,
167
173
.
15.
Kefauver
,
A. P
. (
2001
).
The Audio Recording Handbook
(
A-R Editions, Inc.
,
Middleton
), Chap. 8, pp.
222
223
.
16.
Koelsch
,
S.
,
Schroger
,
E.
, and
Tervaniemi
,
M.
(
1999
). “
Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians
,”
NeuroReport
10
,
1309
1313
.
17.
Maempel
,
H.-J.
, and
Gawlik
,
F.
(
2009
). “
The influence of sound processing on listeners’ program choice in radio broadcasting
,” in
126th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
, Munich, Germany (May 7–9, 2009), Paper #7785.
18.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2012
). “
The perception of loudness
,” in
An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing
, 6th ed. (
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
,
United Kingdon
), pp.
133
167
.
19.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Fullgrabe
,
C.
, and
Stone
,
M. A.
(
2011
). “
Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing aids and paired comparisons
,”
Ear Hear.
32
,
556
568
.
20.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1997
). “
A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss
,”
Aud. Neurosci.
3
,
289
311
.
21.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Stone
,
M. A.
(
2003
). “
Why are commercials so loud? Perception and modeling of the loudness of amplitude-compressed speech
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
51
,
1123
1132
.
22.
Muchnik
,
C.
,
Amir
,
N.
,
Shabtai
,
E.
, and
Kaplan-Neeman
,
R.
(
2012
). “
Preferred listening levels of personal listening devices in young teenagers: Self reports and physical measurements
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
51
,
287
293
.
23.
Munro
,
K. J.
, and
Lutman
,
M. E.
(
2005
). “
Sound quality judgments of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
44
,
92
101
.
24.
Neuhoff
,
J. G.
(
2001
). “
An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion
,”
Ecol. Psychol.
13
,
87
110
.
25.
Neuman
,
A. C.
,
Bakke
,
M. H.
,
Mackersie
,
C.
,
Hellman
,
S.
, and
Levitt
,
H.
(
1998
). “
The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
2273
2281
.
26.
Olive
,
S. E
. (
2003
). “
Differences in performance and preference of trained versus untrained listeners in loudspeaker tests: A case study
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc
.
51
,
806
825
.
27.
Olsen
,
K. N.
,
Stevens
,
C. J.
, and
Tardieu
,
J.
(
2010
). “
Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
36
,
1631
1644
.
28.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
,
Fligor
,
B. J.
,
Mason
,
C. R.
, and
Kidd
,
G.
(
2003
). “
Informational masking and musical training
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
,
1543
1549
.
29.
Parbery-Clark
,
A.
,
Skoe
,
E.
,
Lam
,
C.
, and
Kraus
,
N.
(
2009
). “
Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise
,”
Ear Hear.
30
,
653
661
.
30.
Parbery-Clark
,
A.
,
Strait
,
D. L.
,
Anderson
,
S.
,
Hittner
,
E.
, and
Kraus
,
N
. (
2011
). “
Musical experience and the aging auditory system: Implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise
,”
PLoS ONE
6
(
1-8
),
e18082
.
31.
Patterson
,
R. D.
,
Allerhand
,
M. H.
, and
Giguère
,
C.
(
1995
). “
Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
1890
1894
.
32.
Pras
,
A.
,
Zimmerman
,
R.
,
Levitin
,
D.
, and
Guastavino
,
C
. (
2009
). “
Subjective evaluation of mp3 compression for different musical genres
,” in
127th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
, New York, NY (October 9–12, 2009), Paper #7879.
33.
Rammsayer
,
T.
, and
Altenmuller
,
E.
(
2006
). “
Temporal information processing in musicians and nonmusicians
,”
Music Percept.
24
,
37
47
.
34.
Schmidt
,
J. C.
, and
Rutledge
,
J. C.
(
1996
). “
Multichannel dynamic range compression for music signals
,” in
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
, Atlanta, GA (May 7–10, 1996), Vol. 2, pp.
1013
1016
.
35.
Smeds
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aids users?
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
159
172
.
36.
Souza
,
P. E.
(
2002
). “
Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality
,”
Trends Amplif.
6
,
131
165
.
37.
Souza
,
P. E.
, and
Gallun
,
F.
(
2010
). “
Amplification and consonant modulation spectra
,”
Ear Hear.
31
,
268
276
.
38.
Souza
,
P. E.
, and
Turner
,
C. W.
(
1998
). “
Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
41
,
315
326
.
39.
Stone
,
M. A.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Füllgrabe
,
C.
, and
Hinton
,
A. C.
(
2009
). “
Multichannel fast-acting dynamic range compression hinders performance by young normal-hearing listeners in a two-talker separation task
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
57
,
532
546
.
40.
Strait
,
D. L.
, and
Kraus
,
N.
(
2011
). “
Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise
,”
Front. Psychol.
2
,
1
10
.
41.
Tervaniemi
,
M.
,
Just
,
V.
,
Koelsch
,
S.
,
Widmann
,
A.
, and
Schroger
,
E.
(
2005
). “
Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
161
,
1
10
.
42.
van Buuren
,
R. A.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
1999
). “
Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: Evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2903
2913
.
43.
Vickers
,
E.
(
2011
). “
The loudness war: Do louder, hypercompressed recordings sell better?
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
59
,
346
351
.
You do not currently have access to this content.