Dynamic-range compression (DRC) is used in the music industry to maximize loudness. The amount of compression applied to commercial recordings has increased over time due to a motivating perspective that louder music is always preferred. In contrast to this viewpoint, artists and consumers have argued that using large amounts of DRC negatively affects the quality of music. However, little research evidence has supported the claims of either position. The present study investigated how DRC affects the perceived loudness and sound quality of recorded music. Rock and classical music samples were peak-normalized and then processed using different amounts of DRC. Normal-hearing listeners rated the processed and unprocessed samples on overall loudness, dynamic range, pleasantness, and preference, using a scaled paired-comparison procedure in two conditions: un-equalized, in which the loudness of the music samples varied, and loudness-equalized, in which loudness differences were minimized. Results indicated that a small amount of compression was preferred in the un-equalized condition, but the highest levels of compression were generally detrimental to quality, whether loudness was equalized or varied. These findings are contrary to the “louder is better” mentality in the music industry and suggest that more conservative use of DRC may be preferred for commercial music.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2012
August 08 2012
Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limitinga)
Naomi B. H. Croghan;
Naomi B. H. Croghan
b)
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado
80309
Search for other works by this author on:
Kathryn H. Arehart;
Kathryn H. Arehart
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado
80309
Search for other works by this author on:
James M. Kates
James M. Kates
GN ReSound
, Boulder, Colorado
80309
Search for other works by this author on:
b)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: naomi.croghan@colorado.edu
a)
Portions of this work were presented at the 2012 meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, AZ, March 8–10, 2012.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1177–1188 (2012)
Article history
Received:
April 06 2012
Accepted:
May 26 2012
Citation
Naomi B. H. Croghan, Kathryn H. Arehart, James M. Kates; Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2012; 132 (2): 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4730881
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Feasibility of a hearing-aid speech quality index designed for noisy measurement conditions
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2022)
Inconsistencies between the predicted qualities of enhanced speech signals from two objective metrics
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2019)
Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2017)
Metrics for evaluating noise suppression in hearing aids
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2016)
On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2013)