The effect known as “weak Anderson localization,” “coherent backscattering,” or “enhanced back-scattering” is a physical phenomenon that occurs in random systems, e.g., disordered media and linear wave systems, including reverberation rooms: The mean square response is increased at the drive point. In a reverberation room, this means that one can expect an increase of the reverberant sound field at the position of the source that generates the sound field. This affects the sound power output of the source and is therefore of practical concern. The relative increase of reverberant energy is described by the concentration factor, which is usually assumed to be 2. However, because of the stronger direct sound field at the source position, it is obviously very difficult to measure this quantity directly under steady-state conditions. A related parameter of crucial importance for the ensemble statistics of responses in rooms is the modal kurtosis, which is usually assumed to be 3. The modal kurtosis is also very difficult to measure directly. This paper presents the results of an indirect experimental estimation of the two parameters.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2012
April 12 2012
A note on the modal kurtosis and the concentration factor in reverberation rooms a)
Finn Jacobsen
Finn Jacobsen
b)
Acoustic Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Technical University of Denmark
, Building 352, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
b)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
a)
Portions of this work were presented in “Weak Anderson localisation in reverberation rooms and its effect on the uncertainty of sound power measurements,” Proceedings of Forum Acusticum 2011, Aalborg, Denmark, June 2011.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 2565–2569 (2012)
Article history
Received:
August 04 2011
Accepted:
February 19 2012
Citation
Finn Jacobsen; A note on the modal kurtosis and the concentration factor in reverberation rooms . J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2012; 131 (4): 2565–2569. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3693657
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Performance study of ray-based ocean acoustic tomography methods for estimating submesoscale variability in the upper ocean
Etienne Ollivier, Richard X. Touret, et al.
Related Content
Kurtosis of room impulse responses as a diffuseness measure for reverberation chambers
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2016)
Kurtosis measurements: Implications for noise exposure criteria
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Portfolio optimization with skewness and kurtosis
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2013)
The use of the kurtosis metric in the evaluation of industrial noise exposures.
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2010)
Kurtosis corrected sound pressure level as a noise metric for risk assessment of occupational noises
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2011)