Research in physics education has indicated that the traditional lecture-style class is not the most efficient way to teach introductory physical science courses at the university level. Current best teaching practices focus on creating an active-learning environment and emphasize the students’ role in the learning process. Several of the recommended techniques have recently been applied to Brigham Young University’s introductory acoustics course, which has been taught for more than 40 years. Adjustments have been built on a foundation of establishing student-based learning outcomes and attempting to align these objectives with assessments and course activities. Improvements have been made to nearly every aspect of the course including use of class time, assessment materials, and time the students spend out of the classroom. A description of the progress made in improving the course offers suggestions for those seeking to modernize or create a similar course at their institution. In addition, many of the principles can be similarly applied to acoustics education at other academic levels.
REFERENCES
1.
R.
Bruce Lindsay
, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 2242
(1964
) as seen in Fig. 1.1 of Acoustics—An Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications by Allan D. Pierce (Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1989).2.
L. D.
Fink
, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses
(Jossey-Bass
, San Francisco
, 2003
), pp. 1
–295
.3.
P. T.
Ewell
, “Assessment, accountability, and improvement: Revisiting the tension,” National Instititue for Learning Outcomes and Assessment, found at http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/PeterEwell_006.pdf (last viewed March 21, 2011
).4.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 64
–74
(1998
).5.
R. D.
Knight
, Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching
(Addison Wesley
, San Francisco, CA
, 2004
), pp. 1
–61
.6.
W. J.
Strong
and G. R.
Plitnik
, Music, Speech & High Fidelity
(Brigham Young University Publications
, Provo
, 1977
), pp. 1
–377
.7.
R. B.
Barr
and J.
Tagg
, “From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education
,” Change
27
, 13
–25
(1995
).8.
M.
Weimer
, Learner-centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice
(Jossey-Bass
, San Francisco
, 2002
), pp. 1
–258
.9.
Brigham Young University has placed a great deal of emphasis on learning outcomes as can be seen at http://learningoutcomes.byu.edu/ (last viewed March 21,
2011
.) Guidelines for writing learning outcomes can also be found at this page.10.
McDowell
and K.
Sambell
, “Fitness for purpose in the assessment of learning: Students as stakeholders
,” Qual. Higher Educ.
5
, 107
–123
(1999
).11.
M.
Sirvanci
, “Are students the true customers of higher education?
,” Qual. Prog.
29
, 99
–103
(1996
).12.
W. J.
Strong
and G. R.
Plitnik
, Music Speech Audio
, 3rd ed. (Brigham Young University Publications
, Provo
, 2007
), pp. 1
–566
.13.
W.
Christian
and M.
Belloni
, Physlet Phyics: Interactive Illustrations, Explorations, and Problems for Introductory Physics
(Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 2004
), pp. 1
–326
.14.
L. C.
McDermott
and the Physics Education Group
, Physics by Inquiry
, Vol. 1
(Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ
, 1996
), pp. 1
and the Physics Education Group 373.15.
K.
Feldman
, “Review of the literature on Rijke thermoacoustic phenomena
,” J. Sound Vib.
7
, 83
–89
(1968
).16.
See supplementary materials at http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3676733 for audio demonstrations and video created by professors at BYU and Wayne Peterson the demonstrations coordinator for the Dept. of Physics and Astronomy at BYU.
17.
A. J. M.
Houtsma
, T. D.
Rossing
, and W. M.
Wagenaars
, Auditory Demonstrations Compact Disc
, available through the Acoustical Society of America
, 1987
.18.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Animated Auditory Demonstration: Challenges in Speech Communication and Music Listening DVD, available at http://adl.grc.nasa.gov/334/animated-auditory-demonstrations-ii-challenges-to-speech-communication-and-music-listening/(last viewed March 31,
2011
).19.
Maureen
Stone
, Measuring Speech Production DVD
(1993
), available through the Acoustical Society of America
.20.
D. C.
Copley
and W. J.
Strong
, “A stroboscopic study of lip vibrations in a trombone
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
, 1219
–1226
(1996
).21.
“The Physics Source for Introductory Physics Courses,” on the comPADRE digital library sponsored by a partnership of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), the American Astronomical Society (AAS), the American Institute of Physics/Society of Physics Students (AIP/SPS), and the American Physical Society (APS), http://www.compadre.org/introphys/search/search.cfm?ss=254,256 (last viewed November 1,
2010
).22.
D. R.
Sokoloff
and R. K.
Thornton
, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations: Active Learning in Introductory Physics
(Wiley & Sons
, Hoboken, NJ
, 2004
), pp. 1
–374
.23.
Carl
Wieman
and Katherine
Perkins
, “Transforming Physics Education
,” Phys. Today
58
(11
), 36
–41
(2005
).24.
The PhEt team, “Sound and Waves—PhET Simulations,” http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics/sound-and-waves (last viewed November 1,
2010
).25.
Paul
Falstad
, “Education math and physics applets,” http://falstad.com/mathphysics.html (last viewed November 1, 2010
).26.
L. M.
Padilla-Walker
, “The impact of daily extra credit quizzes on exam performance
,” Teaching Psychol.
33
, 236
–239
(2006
).27.
D. J.
Ballou
and B. R.
Huguenard
, “The impact of students’ perceived computer experience on behavior and performance in an introductory information systems course
,” J. Inf. Syst. Ed.
19
, 87
–98
(2008
).28.
Due to the manner in which students register for the course, the university prohibits mandatory attendance scheduled outside the three class periods.
29.
L. C.
McDermott
, P. S.
Shaffer
, and the Physics Education Group
, Tutorials in Introductory Physics
, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 2002
), pp. 1
–245
.30.
C. H.
Crouch
and E.
Mazur
, “Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
,” Am. J. Phys. 69
9
, 97
–977
(2001
).31.
G.
Novak
, E. T.
Patterson
, A. D.
Gavrin
, and W.
Christian
, “Just in Time Teaching
,” Am. J. Phys.
67(10)
, 937
–938
(1999
).32.
D. R.
Krathwohl
,” A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview
,” Theory Practice
41
, 212
–218
(2002
).33.
B.
Walvoord
, Helping Students Write Well: A Guide for Teachers in All Disciplines
, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall
, New York
, 1985
), pp. 1
–22
.34.
B. F.
Hendengren
, A TA’s Guide to Teaching Writing in All Disciplines
(Bedford/St. Martin’s
, Boston
, 2004
), pp. 9
–21
.35.
One change that was made to the course between the time of acceptance and the publication of this paper was that the reading quizzes were replaced by pre-class learning activities.A description of these activities is found in “Application of active-learning techniques to enhance student-based learning objectives,” by T. B. Neilsen and K. L. Gee, accepted January 2012 for publication in Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics.
36.
M.
Milner-Bolotin
, “Tips for Using a Peer Response System in a Large Introductory Physics Class
,” Phys. Teacher
42
, 253
–254
(2004
).37.
J. E.
Caldwell
, “Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips
,” CBE Life Sci. Ed.
6
, 9
–20
(2007
).38.
C.
Turpen
and N. D.
Finkelstein
, “Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors’ implementation of Peer Instruction
,” Phys. Ed. Res.
5
, 020101
(2009
).39.
40.
A. H.
Benade
, Horns, Strings, and Harmony
(Doubleday Anchor Book
, Garden City, NY
, 1960
), pp. 1
–271
.41.
P. B.
Denes
and E. N.
Pinson
, The Speech Chain
(Bell Telephone Laboratories
, New York
, 1963
) pp. 1
–246
.42.
W. J.
Strong
and G. R.
Plitnik
, Music Speech High-Fidelity
, 2nd ed. (Soundprint
, Provo, UT
, 1983
), pp. 1
–377
.43.
W. J.
Strong
and G. R.
Plitnik
, Music Speech Audio
(Soundprint
, Provo, UT
, 1992
), pp. 1
–558
.44.
B. E.
Anderson
and W. D.
Peterson
,“ The song of the singing rod
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
, in press (2010
).© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.
2012
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
