The closed quotient, i.e., the ratio between the closed phase and the period, is commonly studied in voice research. However, the term may refer to measures derived from different methods, such as inverse filtering, electroglottography or high-speed digital imaging (HSDI). This investigation compares closed quotient data measured by these three methods in two boy singers. Each singer produced sustained tones on two different pitches and a glissando. Audio, electroglottographic signal (EGG), and HSDI were recorded simultaneously. The audio signal was inverse filtered by means of the decap program; the closed phase was defined as the flat minimum portion of the flow glottogram. Glottal area was automatically measured in the high speed images by the built-in camera software, and the closed phase was defined as the flat minimum portion of the area-signal. The EGG-signal was analyzed in four different ways using the matlab open quotient interface. The closed quotient data taken from the EGG were found to be considerably higher than those obtained from inverse filtering. Also, substantial differences were found between the closed quotient derived from HSDI and those derived from inverse filtering. The findings illustrate the importance of distinguishing between these quotients.

1.
S.
Granqvist
,
S.
Hertegård
,
H.
,
Larsson
, and
J.
,
Sundberg
, “
Simultaneous analysis of vocal fold vibration and transglottal airflow: Exploring a new experimental setup
,”
J. Voice
17
,
319
330
(
2003
).
2.
S.
Hertegård
and
J.
,
Gauffin
, “
Voice source-filter interaction during high-pitched female singing
,” in
Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference 1993
, edited by
A.
Friberg
,
J.
Iwarsson
,
E.
Jansson
, and
J.
Sundberg
(
Royal Swedish Academy of Music
,
Stockholm
,
1994
), pp.
177
182
.
3.
I. R.
Titze
, “
Interpretation of the electroglottographic signal
,”
J. Voice
4
,
1
9
(
1990
).
4.
C.
Herbst
and
S.
Ternström
, “
A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient
,”
Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol.
31
,
126
138
(
2006
).
5.
M.
Echternach
,
S.
Dippold
,
J.
Sundberg
,
S.
Arndt
,
M.
Zander
, and
B.
Richter
, “
High-speed imaging and electroglottography measurements of the open quotient in untrained male voices’ register transitions
,”
J. Voice
24
,
644
650
(
2010
).
6.
D. G.
Childers
,
S. M.
Hicks
,
G. P.
Moore
,
L.
Eskenazi
, and
A. L.
Lalwani
, “
Electroglottography and vocal fold physiology
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
33
,
245
254
(
1990
).
7.
P.
Alku
,
E.
Vilkman
, and
U. K.
Laine
, “
A comparison of EGG and a new automatic inverse filtering method in phonation change from breathy to normal
,” in
Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
(
Acoustical Society of Japan
,
Tokyo
,
1990
), pp.
197
200
.
8.
A.
McAllister
,
E.
Sederholm
,
E. J.
Sundberg
, and
P.
Gramming
, “
Relations between voice range profiles and physiological and perceptual voice characteristics in ten-year-old children
,”
J. Voice
8
,
230
239
(
1994
).
9.
E. T.
Stathopoulos
and
C. M.
Sapienza
, “
Developmental changes in laryngeal and respiratory function with variations in sound pressure level
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
40
,
596
614
(
1997
).
10.
P.
White
,
Acoustic and Aerodynamic Measurements of Children’s Voices
, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Surrey
, Surrey, United Kingdom,
1997
.
11.
M. P.
Robb
and
J. O.
Simmons
, “
Gender comparisons of children’s vocal fold contact behavior
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
1318
1322
(
1990
).
12.
H. A.
Cheyne
,
R. C.
Nuss
, and
R. E.
Hillmann
, “
Electroglottography in the pediatric population
,”
Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck. Surg.
125
,
1105
1108
(
1999
).
13.
C.
Barlow
and
D. M.
Howard
, “
Electrolaryngographically derived voice source changes of child and adolescent singers
,”
Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol.
30
,
147
157
(
2005
).
14.
N.
Henrich
,
C.
Alessandro
,
B.
Doval
, and
M.
Castellengo
, “
On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
1321
1332
(
2004
).
15.
matlab (version R2009b) [computer program] (
The MathWorks, Inc.
, Natick, MA,
2009
).
16.
N.
Henrich
,
MOQ-Interface
, http://voiceresearch.free.fr/egg/ (date last viewed 10/13/11).
17.
D. M.
Howard
,
G. A.
Lindsey
, and
B.
Allen
, “
Towards the quantification of vocal efficiency
,”
J. Voice
4
,
205
212
(
1990
).
18.
D. M.
Howard
, “
Variation of electrolaryngographically derived closed quotient for trained and untrained adult female singers
,”
J. Voice
9
,
163
172
(
1995
).
19.
M.
Rothenberg
and
J. J.
Mahshie
, “
Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
31
,
338
351
(
1988
).
20.
S.
Granqvist
, decap (Version 3.0.0.2) [computer program], http://www.tolvan.com/decap (date last viewed 11/08/11).
21.
S.
Granqvist
, s-naq (Version 0.0.0.1) [computer program], http://www.tolvan.com/snaq/ (date last viewed 10/13/11).
22.
Glottal-Enterprises, “
Frequently Asked Questions
,” http://www.glottal.com/faq.htm#nocontact (date last viewed 10/13/11).
23.
J.
Sundberg
,
M.
Thalén
,
P.
,
Alku
, and
E.
,
Vilkman
, “
Estimating perceived phonatory pressedness in singing from flow glottograms
,”
J. Voice
18
,
56
62
(
2004
).
24.
F. L.
Wuyts
,
L.
Heylen
,
F.
Mertens
,
B. M.
De
, and
P. H.
van de Heyning
, “
Normative voice range profiles of untrained boys and girls
,”
J. Voice
16
,
460
465
(
2002
).
25.
A.
McAllister
,
E.
Sederholm
, and
J.
Sundberg
, “
Perceptual and acoustical analysis of vocal registers in ten-year-old children
,”
Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol.
25
,
63
71
(
2000
).
26.
N.
Henrich
,
C.
D’Alessandro
,
B.
Doval
, and
M.
Castellengo
, “
Glottal open quotient in singing: Measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
1417
1430
(
2005
).
27.
M.
Echternach
,
J.
Sundberg
,
M.
Zander
, and
B.
Richter
, “
Perturbation measurements in untrained male voices’ transitions from modal to falsetto register
,”
J. Voice
25
,
663
669
(
2011
).
28.
B.
Roubeau
,
N.
Henrich
, and
M.
Castellengo
, “
Laryngeal vibratory mechanisms: The notion of vocal register revisited
,”
J. Voice
23
,
425
438
(
2009
).
You do not currently have access to this content.