This work concerns speech intelligibility tests and measurements in three primary schools in Italy, one of which was conducted before and after an acoustical treatment. Speech intelligibility scores (IS) with different reverberation times (RT) and types of noise were obtained using diagnostic rhyme tests on 983 pupils from grades 2–5 (nominally 7–10 year olds), and these scores were then correlated with the Speech Transmission Index (STI). The grade 2 pupils understood fewer words in the lower STI range than the pupils in the higher grades, whereas an IS of ∼97% was achieved by all the grades with a STI of 0.9. In the presence of traffic noise, which resulted the most interfering noise, a decrease in RT from 1.6 to 0.4 s determined an IS increase on equal A-weighted speech-to-noise level difference, S/N(A), which varied from 13% to 6%, over the S/N(A) range of −15 to +6 dB, respectively. In the case of babble noise, whose source was located in the middle of the classroom, the same decrease in reverberation time leads to a negligible variation in IS over a similar S/N(A) range.

1.
ISO9921
,
Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Genève
,
2003
).
2.
C.
Flexer
, “
The impact of classroom acoustics: Listening, learning, and literacy
,”
Semin. Hear.
25
(
2
),
131
140
(
2004
).
3.
ISO TR4870
,
Acoustics—the Construction and Calibration of Speech Intelligibility Tests
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Genève
,
1991
).
4.
EN 60268-16
,
Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index
(
European Committee for Standardization
,
Brussels
,
2003
).
5.
T.
Houtgast
, “
The effect of ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms
,”
Appl. Acoust.
14
,
15
25
(
1981
).
6.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
(
3
),
846
854
(
1986
).
7.
J. S.
Bradley
and
H.
Sato
, “
The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
(
4
),
2078
2086
(
2008
).
8.
L. L.
Elliott
, “
Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
(
3
),
651
653
(
1979
).
9.
A.
Neuman
and
I.
Hochberg
, “
Children’s perception of speech in reverberation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
2145
2149
(
1983
).
10.
W.
Yang
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
(
2
),
922
933
(
2009
).
11.
N.
Prodi
,
C.
Visentin
, and
A.
Farnetani
, “
Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
(
1
),
172
181
(
2010
).
12.
V. M. A.
Peutz
, “
Articulation loss of consonants as a criterion for speech transmission in a room
,”
J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
19
(
11
),
915
919
(
1971
).
13.
M.
Hodgson
and
E. M.
Nosal
, “
Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
(
2
),
931
939
(
2002
).
14.
W.
Yang
and
M.
Hodgson
, “
Auralization study of optimum reverberation times for speech intelligibility for normal and hearing-impaired listeners in classrooms with diffuse sound fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
(
2
),
801
807
(
2006
).
15.
P.
Bonaventura
,
A.
Paoloni
,
F.
Canavesio
, and
P.
Usai
, “
Realizzazione di un test di intelligibilità per la lingua italiana (Development of a diagnostic intelligibility test in the Italian language)
,”
Rapporto Tecnico 3C1286
,
Fondazione Ugo Bordoni
,
Roma
(
1986
).
16.
ISO 3382-1
,
Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 1: Performance Spaces
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Genève
,
2009
).
17.
I. D.
Griffiths
and
F. J.
Langdon
, “
Subjective response to road traffic noise
,”
J. Sound Vib.
8
,
16
32
(
1968
).
18.
L.
Barca
,
A. W.
Ellis
, and
C.
Burani
, “
Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children
,”
Read. Writ.
20
,
495
509
(
2007
).
19.
I.
Bork
, “
A comparison of room simulation software: the 2nd round robin on room acoustic computer simulation
,”
Acustica
86
,
943
956
(
2000
).
20.
JCGM100,
Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
(Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology,
2008
), http://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/GUM-JCGM100.htm (last viewed May 5 2011).
21.
ISO/IEC Guide 43-1
,
Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons. Part1: Development and Operation of Proficiency Testing Schemes
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Genève
,
1997
).
22.
B.
Wayne Anderson
and
J. T.
Kalb
, “
English verification of the STI method for estimating speech intelligibility of a communications channel
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
(
6
),
1982
1985
(
1987
).
23.
E. L. J.
George
,
J. M.
Festen
, and
T.
Houtgast
, “
The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
(
2
),
1269
1277
(
2008
).
You do not currently have access to this content.