Objective acoustic parameters have been measured in 30 school classrooms. These parameters include usual descriptors of the acoustic quality from the listeners’ standpoint, such as reverberation time, speech transmission index, and background noise level, and two descriptors of the acoustic properties for a speaker: Voice support and room gain. This paper describes the measurement method for these two parameters and presents a prediction model for voice support and room gain derived from the diffuse field theory. The voice support for medium-sized classrooms with volumes between 100 and 250 m3 and good acoustical quality lies in the range between −14 and −9 dB, whereas the room gain is in the range between 0.2 and 0.5 dB. The prediction model for voice support describes the measurements in the classrooms with a coefficient of determination of 0.84 and a standard deviation of 1.2 dB.
REFERENCES
1.
B.
Shield
and J.
Dockrell
, “The effects of noise on children at school: a review
,” Build. Acoust.
10
, 97
–116
(2003
). 2.
B.
Shield
and J.
Dockrell
, “The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 133
–144
(2008
). 3.
M.
Klatte
, M.
Meis
, H.
Sukowski
, and A.
Schick
, “Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children
,” Noise Health
9
, 64
–73
(2007
). 4.
A.
Neuman
and I.
Hochberg
, “Children’s perception of speech in reverberation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
, 2145
–2149
(1983
). 5.
J.
Bradley
, H.
Sato
, and M.
Picard
, “On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 3233
–3244
(2003
). 6.
A.
Neuman
, M.
Wroblewski
, J.
Hajicek
, and A.
Rubinstein
, “Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults
,” Ear Hear.
31
, 336
–344
(2010
). 7.
J.
Bradley
, “Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
, 846
–854
(1986
). 8.
J.
Bradley
, R.
Reich
, and S.
Norcross
, “On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
, 1820
–1828
(1999
). 9.
M.
Klatte
, T.
Lachmann
, and M.
Meis
, “Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting
,” Noise Health
12
, 270
–282
(2010
). 10.
J.
Bradley
, “Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
, 837
–845
(1986
). 11.
S. R.
Bistafa
and J. S.
Bradley
, “Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 861
–875
(2000
). 12.
V.
Lyberg-Åhlander
, R.
Rydell
, and A.
Löfqvist
, “Speaker’s comfort in teaching environments: Voice problems in Swedish teaching staff
,” J. Voice
25
, 430
–440
(2011
). 13.
N.
Roy
, R.
Merrill
, S.
Thibeault
, R.
Parsa
, S.
Gray
, and E.
Smith
, “Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
, 281
–293
(2004
). 14.
E.
Vilkman
, “Voice problems at work: A challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement
,” Folia Phoniatr. Logo.
52
, 120
–125
(2000
). 15.
E.
Lombard
, “Le signe de l’elevation de la voix (The sign of the elevation of the voice)
,” Ann. Maladies Oreille, Larynx, Nez, Pharynx
37
, 101
–119
(1911
).16.
H.
Lazarus
, “Prediction of verbal communication in noise—a review: Part 1
” Appl. Acoust.
19
, 439
–463
(1986
). 17.
J.
Brunskog
, A.
Gade
, G. P.
Ballester
, and L. R.
Calbo
, “Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 2072
–2082
(2009
). 18.
D.
Pelegrin-Garcia
, B.
Smits
, J.
Brunskog
, and C.-H.
Jeong
, “Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
, 1981
–1990
(2011
). 19.
M.
Hodgson
, R.
Rempel
, and S.
Kennedy
, “Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 226
–233
(1999
). 20.
M.
Kob
, G.
Behler
, A.
Kamprolf
, O.
Goldschmidt
, and C.
Neuschaefer-Rube
, “Experimental investigations of the influence of room acoustics on the teachers voice
,” Acoust. Sci. Tech.
29
, 86
–94
(2008
). 21.
L.
Nijs
and M.
Rychtarikova
, “Calculating the optimum reverberation time and absorption coefficient for good speech intelligibility in classroom design using U50
” Acta Acust. Acust.
97
, 93
–102
(2011
). 22.
D.
Pelegrin-Garcia
, “Comment on ‘Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2072–2082 (2009)]
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
, 1161
–1164
(2011
). 23.
D.
Pelegrin-Garcia
, O.
Fuentes-Mendizabal
, J.
Brunskog
, and C.-H.
Jeong
, “Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustic conditions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
130
, 228
–238
(2011
). 24.
K.
Ueno
, K.
Kato
, and K.
Kawai
, “Effect of room acoustics on musicians’ performance. Part I: experimental investigation with a conceptual model
,” Acta Acust. Acust.
96
, 505
–515
(2010
). 25.
D.
Cabrera
, D.
Lee
, R.
Collins
, B.
Hartmann
, W.
Martens
, and H.
Sato
, “Variation in oral-binaural room impulse responses for horizontal rotations of a head and torso simulator
,” Build. Acoust.
18
, 227
–252
(2011
). 26.
A.
Gade
, “Investigations of musicians’ room acoustic conditions in concert halls. Part I: Methods and laboratory experiments
,” Acustica
69
, 193
–203
(1989
).27.
A.
Gade
, “Investigations of musicians room acoustic conditions in concert halls. Part II: Field experiments and synthesis of results
,” Acustica
69
, 249
–262
(1989
).28.
H.
Knecht
, P.
Nelson
, G.
Whitelaw
, and L.
Feth
, “Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: Predictions and measurements
,” Am. J. Audiol.
11
, 65
–71
(2002
). 29.
E.
Pekkarinen
and V.
Viljanen
, “Acoustic conditions for speech communication in class-rooms
,” Scand. Audiol.
20
, 257
–263
(1991
). 30.
M.
Hodgson
, “Rating, ranking, and understanding acoustical quality in university class-rooms
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
, 568
–575
(2002
). 31.
ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010
: Part 1 American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, Part 1: Permanent Schools
(Acoustical Society of America
, Melville, NY
, 2010
).32.
“
Acoustic design of schools TSO
,” Building Bulletin 93, Department of Education and Skills, London (2004
).33.
SS 25268:2007
, “Building acoustics—sound classification of spaces in buildings—health care facilities, educational facilities, day-care centers, offices and hotels
,” Swedish Standards Institute
, Stockholm, Sweden (2007
).34.
Guidelines for Community Noise
(World Health Organization
Geneva
, 1999
).35.
D.
Cabrera
, H.
Sato
, W.
Martens
, and D.
Lee
, “Binaural measurement and simulation of the room acoustical response from a person’s mouth to their ears
,” Acoust. Aust.
37
, 98
–103
(2009
).36.
ITU-T P. 58
, “Head and torso simulator for telephonometry
,” Recommendation, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (1996
).37.
W.
Olsen
, “Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: A summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) report
,” Am. J. Audiol.
7
, 21
–25
(1998
). 38.
W.
Chu
and A.
Warnock
, “Detailed directivity of sound fields around human talkers
,” Technical Report, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada
, Ottawa, Canada (2002
).39.
40.
M.
Schroeder
, “New method of measuring reverberation time
” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
, 409
–412
(1965
). 41.
T.
Houtgast
and H.
Steeneken
, “A multi-language evaluation of the RASTI-method for estimating speech-intelligibility in auditoria
,” Acustica
54
, 185
–199
(1984
).© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.
2012
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.