Past studies have shown that when formants are perturbed in real time, speakers spontaneously compensate for the perturbation by changing their formant frequencies in the opposite direction to the perturbation. Further, the pattern of these results suggests that the processing of auditory feedback error operates at a purely acoustic level. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the response of three language groups to real-time formant perturbations, (1) native English speakers producing an English vowel /ε/, (2) native Japanese speakers producing a Japanese vowel (), and (3) native Japanese speakers learning English, producing /ε/. All three groups showed similar production patterns when F1 was decreased; however, when F1 was increased, the Japanese groups did not compensate as much as the native English speakers. Due to this asymmetry, the hypothesis that the compensatory production for formant perturbation operates at a purely acoustic level was rejected. Rather, some level of phonological processing influences the feedback processing behavior.
REFERENCES
1.
Bauer
, J. J.
, Mittal
, J.
, Larson
, C. R.
, and Hain
, T. C.
(2006
). “Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
, 2363
–2371
.2.
Burnett.
T. A.
, Freedland
, M. B.
, Larson
, C. R.
, and Hain
, T. C.
(1998
). “Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
, 3153
–3161
.3.
Cai
, S.
, Ghosh
, S. S.
, Guenther
, F. H.
, and Perkell
, J. S.
(2010
). “Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
, 2033
–2048
.4.
Chen
, Y.
, Robb
, M. P.
, Gilbert
, H. R.
, and Lerman
, J. W.
(2001
). “Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English,”
Clin. Linguist. Phonetics
6
, 427
–440
.5.
Cowie
, R.
, and Douglas-Cowie
, E.
(1992
). Postlingually Acquired Deafness: Speech Deterioration and the Wider Consequences
(Mouton de Gruyter
, New York)
, p. 304
.6.
Guenther
, F. H.
(1995
). “Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production,”
Psychol. Rev.
102
, 594
–621
.7.
Guenther
, F. H.
, and Vladusich
, T. A.
(2009
). “A neural theory of speech acquisition and production,”
J. Neurolinguistics
, doi:.8.
Houde
, J. F.
, and Jordan
, M. I.
(2002
). “Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
, 295
–310
.9.
Jones
, J. A.
, and Munhall
, K. G.
(2000
). “Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
, 1246
–1251
.10.
Kuhl
, P. K.
(1991
). “Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not,”
Percept. Psychophys.
50
, 93
–107
.11.
MacDonald
, E. N.
, Goldberg
. R.
, and Munhall
, K. G.
(2010
). “Compensation in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
, 1059
–1068
.12.
MacDonald
, E. N.
, Purcell
, D. W.
, and Munhall
, K.G.
(2011
). “Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
, 955
–966
.13.
Manuel
, S. Y.
(1990
). “The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 1286
–1298
.14.
Munhall
, K. G.
, MacDonald
, E. N.
, Byrne
, S. K.
, and Johnsrude
, I.
(2009
). “Speakers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed to resist compensation,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 384
–390
.15.
Ng
, M. L.
, Chen
, Y.
, and Sadaka
, J.
(2008
). “Vowel features in Turkish accented English,”
Int. J. Speech-Language Pathology
10
, 404
–413
.16.
Nishi
, K.
, and Kewley-Port
, D.
(2007
). “Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets,”
J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
50
, 1496
–1509
.17.
Orfanidis
, S. J.
(1988
). Optimum Signal Processing, An Introduction
(MacMillan
, New York)
, p
–590
.18.
Polka
, L.
, and Bohn
, O.-S.
(2003
).“Asymmetries in vowel perception,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
, 1111
–1129
.19.
Purcell
, D. W.
, and Muhhall
, K. G.
(2006
). “Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
, 966
–977
(2006
).20.
Schenk
, B. S.
, Baumgartner
, W. D.
, and Hamzavi
, J. S.
(2003
). “Effects of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers,”
Auris Nasau Larynx
30
, 333
–339
.21.
Shiller
, D. M.
, Sato
, M.
, Gracco
, V. L.
, and Baum
, S. R.
(2009
). “Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 1103
–1113
.22.
Strange
, W.
, Akahane-Yamada
, R.
, Kubo
, R.
, Trent
, S. A.
, Nishi
, K.
, and Jenkins
, J. J.
(1998
). “Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners,”
J. Phonetics
26
, 311
–344
.23.
Strange
, W.
, Akahane-Yamada
, R.
, Kubo
, R.
, Trent
, S. A.
, and Nishi
, K.
(2001
). “Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 1691
–1704
.24.
Stevens
, K. N.
(1989
). “On the quantal nature of speech,”
J. Phonetics
, 17
, 3
–45
.25.
Vance
, T. J.
(1987
). An Introduction to Japanese Phonology
(State University of New York Press
, Albany, NY
), p
–11
.26.
Villacorta
, V. M.
, Perkell
, J. S.
, and Guenther
, F. H.
(2007
). “Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
, 2306
–2319
.27.
Waldstein
R. S.
(1990
). “Effects of postlingual deadness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 2099
–2114
.28.
Wang
, H.
, and van Heuven
, V. J.
(2006
). “Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers,”
in Linguistics, edited by J. M.
van de Weijer
and B.
Los
(Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
), pp. 237
–248
.© 2011 Acoustical Society of America.
2011
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.