In sequences such as law and order, speakers of British English often insert /r/ between law and and. Acoustic analyses revealed such “intrusive” /r/ to be significantly shorter than canonical /r/. In a 2AFC experiment, native listeners heard British English sentences in which /r/ duration was manipulated across a word boundary [e.g., saw (r)ice], and orthographic and semantic factors were varied. These listeners responded categorically on the basis of acoustic evidence for /r/ alone, reporting ice after short /r/s, rice after long /r/s; orthographic and semantic factors had no effect. Dutch listeners proficient in English who heard the same materials relied less on durational cues than the native listeners, and were affected by both orthography and semantic bias. American English listeners produced intermediate responses to the same materials, being sensitive to duration (less so than native, more so than Dutch listeners), and to orthography (less so than the Dutch), but insensitive to the semantic manipulation. Listeners from language communities without common use of intrusive /r/ may thus interpret intrusive /r/ as canonical /r/, with a language difference increasing this propensity more than a dialect difference. Native listeners, however, efficiently distinguish intrusive from canonical /r/ by exploiting the relevant acoustic variation.

1.
Best
,
C. T.
,
McRoberts
,
G. W.
, and
Goodell
,
E
. (
2001
). “
Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
775
794
.
2.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, and
Alexander
,
J. A
. (
2007
). “
Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2339
2349
.
3.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
,
Pisoni
,
D. B.
,
Akahane-Yamada
,
R.
, and
Tohkura
,
Y. I
. (
1997
). “
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
2299
2310
.
4.
Broadbent
,
J
. (
1991
). “
Linking and intrusive r in English
,”
UCL Working Papers Linguist.
3
,
281
302
.
5.
Broersma
,
M.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
2008
). “
Phantom word recognition in L2
,”
Syst.: Int. J. Educ. Technol. Appl. Linguist.
36
,
22
34
.
6.
Broersma
,
M.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
2011
). “
Competition dynamics of second-language listening
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
64
,
74
95
.
7.
Cho
,
T.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, and
Cox
,
E. A
. (
2007
). “
Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English
,”
J. Phonetics
35
,
210
243
.
8.
Clopper
,
C. G.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R
. (
2006
). “
Effects of dialect variation on speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3424
.
9.
Cohen
,
J
. (
1992
). “
A power primer
,”
Psychol. Bull.
112
,
155
159
.
10.
Collins
,
B.
, and
Mees
,
I. M.
(
1999
).
The Phonetics of English and Dutch
(
Brill
,
Leiden
), pp.
178
181
.
11.
Connine
,
C. M.
,
Ranbom
,
L. J.
, and
Patterson
,
D. J
. (
2008
). “
Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
70
,
403
411
.
12.
Coren
,
S.
,
Ward
,
L. M.
, and
Enns
,
J. T.
(
1994
).
Sensation and Perception
, 4th ed. (
Harcourt Brace College Publishers
,
Fort Worth
), pp.
234
235
.
13.
Cruttenden
,
A.
, and
Gimson
,
A. C.
(
1994
).
Gimson’s Pronunciation of English
(
Arnold
,
London
), pp.
187
, 262–264.
14.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Smits
,
R.
, and
Cooper
,
N
. (
2005
). “
Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect
,”
Speech Commun.
47
,
32
42
.
15.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Weber
,
A.
, and
Otake
,
T
. (
2006
). “
Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening
,”
J. Phonetics
34
,
269
284
.
16.
Darcy
,
I.
,
Peperkamp
,
S.
, and
Dupoux
,
E.
(
2007
).
“Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners,”
in
Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9
, edited by
J.
Cole
and
J.
Hualde
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
Berlin
), pp.
411
442
.
17.
Dutoit
,
T.
,
Pagel
,
V.
,
Pierret
,
N.
,
Bataille
,
F.
, and
van der Vreken
,
O.
(
1996
).
“The MBROLA Project: Towards a Set of High-Quality Speech Synthesizers Free of Use for Non–Commercial Purposes,”
in
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1996)
,
Philadelphia, PA
, pp.
1393
1396
.
18.
Escudero
,
P.
,
Hayes-Harb
,
R.
, and
Mitterer
,
H
. (
2008
). “
Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access
,”
J. Phonetics
36
,
345
360
.
19.
Evans
,
B. G.
, and
Iverson
,
P
. (
2004
). “
Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
352
361
.
20.
Floccia
,
C.
,
Goslin
,
J.
,
Girard
,
F.
, and
Konopczynski
,
G
. (
2006
). “
Does a regional accent perturb speech processing?
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum.
32
,
1276
1293
.
21.
Foulkes
,
P.
, and
Docherty
,
G.
, eds. (
1999
).
Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles
(
Arnold
,
London
), pp.
51
76
111
133
147
174
.
22.
Giegerich
,
H. J.
(
1992
).
English Phonology: An Introduction
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
), pp.
66
, 28–283.
23.
Guion
,
S. G.
,
Flege
,
J. E.
,
Akahane-Yamada
,
R.
, and
Pruitt
,
J. C
. (
2000
). “
An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
2711
2724
.
24.
Gussenhoven
,
C.
, and
Broeders
,
A.
(
1997
).
English Pronunciation for Student Teachers
(
Wolters-Noordhoff
,
Groningen
), pp.
16
17
, 154–155.
25.
Ingram
,
J. C. L.
, and
Park
,
S. -G
. (
1998
). “
Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
1161
1174
.
26.
Irwin
,
P.
, and
Nagy
,
N
. (
2007
). “
Bostonians /r/ speaking: A quantitative look at (R) in Boston
,”
Penn Working Papers Linguist.
13
,
135
148
.
27.
Kirby
,
J
. (
2010
) “
Dialect experience in Vietnamese tone perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
,
3749
3757
.
28.
Miller
,
J. L.
, and
Grosjean
,
F
. (
1997
). “
Dialect effects in vowel perception: The role of temporal information in French
,”
Lang. Speech
40
,
277
288
.
29.
Mitterer
,
H.
,
Csépe
,
V.
, and
Blomert
,
L
. (
2006a
). “
The role of perceptual integration in the perception of assimilation word forms
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
59
,
1395
1424
.
30.
Mitterer
,
H.
,
Csépe
,
V.
,
Honbolygo
,
F.
, and
Blomert
,
L
. (
2006b
). “
The recognition of phonologically assimilated words does not depend on specific language experience
,”
Cogn. Sci.
30
,
451
479
.
31.
Mitterer
,
H.
, and
Ernestus
,
M
. (
2006
). “
Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch
,”
J. Phonetics
34
,
73
103
.
32.
Otake
,
T.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
1999
). “
Perception of suprasegmental structure in a non-native dialect
,”
J. Phonetics
27
,
229
253
.
33.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
2003
). “
Perceptual learning in speech
,”
Cogn. Psychol.
47
,
204
238
.
34.
Pitt
,
M. A.
,
Dilley
,
L.
,
Johnson
,
K.
,
Kiesling
,
S.
,
Raymond
,
W.
,
Hume
,
E.
, and
Fosler-Lussier
,
E.
(
2007
).
“Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release) [www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu]”
[
Department of Psychology, OH State University (Distributor).
Columbus, OH
] (Last viewed 9 June 2010).
35.
Polka
,
L
. (
1995
). “
Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1286
1296
.
36.
Scott
,
D. R.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
1984
). “
Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure
,”
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
23
,
450
466
.
37.
Spinelli
,
E.
,
Cutler
,
A.
, and
McQueen
,
J. M
. (
2002
). “
Resolution of liaison for lexical access in French
,”
Rev. Fr. Linguist. Appl.
7
,
83
96
.
38.
Spinelli
,
E.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
2003
). “
Processing resyllabified words in French
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
48
,
233
254
.
39.
Sumner
,
M.
, and
Samuel
,
A. G
. (
2009
). “
The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
60
,
487
501
.
40.
Trudgill
,
P.
(
1986
).
Dialects in Contact
(
Basil Blackwell
,
Oxford
), pp.
76
77
.
41.
Tuinman
,
A.
,
Mitterer
,
H.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
(
2007
).
“Speakers differentiate English intrusive and onset /r/, but L2 listeners do not,”
in
Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, edited by
J.
Trouvain
and
W. J.
Barry
(
Pirrot, Dudweiler
,
Germany
), pp.
1905
1908
.
42.
Underbakke
,
M.
,
Polka
,
L.
,
Gottfried
,
T. L.
, and
Strange
,
W
. (
1988
). “
Trading relations in the perception of /r/-/l/ by Japanese learners of English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
90
100
.
43.
van Bezooijen
,
R
. “
Approximant /r/ in Dutch: Routes and feelings
,” (
2005
).
Speech Commun.
47
,
15
31
.
44.
van de Velde
,
H.
(
1996
).
“Variatie en verandering in het gesproken Standaard-Nederlands (1935–1993)
[Variation and change in spoken standard Dutch (1935–1993)],”
Dissertation, Nijmegen University
.
45.
Weber
,
A.
, and
Cutler
,
A
. (
2004
). “
Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
50
,
1
25
.
46.
Wells
,
J. C.
(
1982
).
Accents of English
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
), p.
520
.
47.
Wolfram
,
W.
, and
Schilling-Estes
,
N.
(
2006
).
American English: Dialects and Variation
(
Blackwell, Malden
,
MA
), pp.
105
106
.
You do not currently have access to this content.