In an important paper on the physics of small amplitude oscillations, Titze showed that the essence of the vertical phase difference, which allows energy to be transferred from the flowing air to the motion of the vocal folds, could be captured in a surface wave model, and he derived a formula for the phonation threshold pressure with an explicit dependence on the geometrical and biomechanical properties of the vocal folds. The formula inspired a series of experiments [e.g., R. Chan and I. Titze, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 119, 2351–2362 (2006)]. Although the experiments support many aspects of Titze’s formula, including a linear dependence on the glottal half-width, the behavior of the experiments at the smallest values of this parameter is not consistent with the formula. It is shown that a key element for removing this discrepancy lies in a careful examination of the properties of the entrance loss coefficient. In particular, measurements of the entrance loss coefficient at small widths done with a physical model of the glottis (M5) show that this coefficient varies inversely with the glottal width. A numerical solution of the time-dependent equations of the surface wave model shows that adding a supraglottal vocal tract lowers the phonation threshold pressure by an amount approximately consistent with Chan and Titze’s experiments.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2011
September 02 2011
Phonation threshold pressure: Comparison of calculations and measurements taken with physical models of the vocal fold mucosa
Lewis P. Fulcher;
Lewis P. Fulcher
a)
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Bowling Green State University
, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Search for other works by this author on:
Ronald C. Scherer
Ronald C. Scherer
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders,
Bowling Green State University
, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: fulcher@bgsu.edu
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 1597–1605 (2011)
Article history
Received:
September 15 2010
Accepted:
June 09 2011
Citation
Lewis P. Fulcher, Ronald C. Scherer; Phonation threshold pressure: Comparison of calculations and measurements taken with physical models of the vocal fold mucosa. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2011; 130 (3): 1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3605672
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
In a presentation, Ted once said I'd like my epitaph to be “I simplified.”
Paul Schomer, Truls Gjestland
Related Content
Phonation threshold pressure and the elastic shear modulus: Comparison of two-mass model calculations with experiments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2012)
Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1997)
Effect of vocal fold tissue shear properties on phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the larynx
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2000)
The surface wave model of phonation threshold pressure and physical models of the vocal fold mucosa: Theory and experiment.
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2010)
Phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1995)