In an important paper on the physics of small amplitude oscillations, Titze showed that the essence of the vertical phase difference, which allows energy to be transferred from the flowing air to the motion of the vocal folds, could be captured in a surface wave model, and he derived a formula for the phonation threshold pressure with an explicit dependence on the geometrical and biomechanical properties of the vocal folds. The formula inspired a series of experiments [e.g., R. Chan and I. Titze, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 119, 2351–2362 (2006)]. Although the experiments support many aspects of Titze’s formula, including a linear dependence on the glottal half-width, the behavior of the experiments at the smallest values of this parameter is not consistent with the formula. It is shown that a key element for removing this discrepancy lies in a careful examination of the properties of the entrance loss coefficient. In particular, measurements of the entrance loss coefficient at small widths done with a physical model of the glottis (M5) show that this coefficient varies inversely with the glottal width. A numerical solution of the time-dependent equations of the surface wave model shows that adding a supraglottal vocal tract lowers the phonation threshold pressure by an amount approximately consistent with Chan and Titze’s experiments.

1.
K.
Ishizaka
and
M.
Matsudaira
,
“Fluid mechanical consideration of vocal cord vibration,”
Speech Communication Research Laboratory Monograph
, No. 8.,
Santa Barbara, CA
,
1
75
(
1972
).
2.
K.
Ishizaka
and
J.
Flanagan
,
“Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two mass model of the vocal cords,”
Bell Sys. Tech. J.
52
,
1233
1268
(
1972
).
3.
I.
Titze
,
“The physics of small amplitude oscillation of the vocal folds,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
1536
1552
(
1988
).
4.
R.
Scherer
and
C.
Guo
,
“Laryngeal modeling: translaryngeal pressure for a model with many laryngeal shapes,”
in
ICSLP Proceedings, 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
(
The Acoustical Society of Japan
), vol.
1
, pp.
3
1
1
3
1
4
.
5.
R.
Scherer
and
C.
Guo
,
“Generalized translaryngeal pressure coefficient for a wide range of laryngeal configurations,”
in
Vocal Fold Physiology: Acoustical, Perceptual, and Physiological Aspects of Voice Mechanisms
, edited by
J
,
Gauffin
and
B.
Hammarberg
(
Singular
,
San Diego
,
1991
), pp.
83
90
.
6.
L.
Fulcher
,
R.
Scherer
,
G.
Zhai
, and
Z.
Zhu
,
“Analytic representation of volume flow as a function of geometry and pressure in a static physical model of the glottis,”
J. Voice
24
,
489
512
(
2006
).
7.
I.
Titze
,
S.
Schmidt
, and
M.
Titze
,
“Phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3080
3084
(
1995
).
8.
R.
Chan
,
I.
Titze
, and
M.
Titze
,
“Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
3722
3727
(
1997
).
9.
R.
Chan
and
I.
Titze
,
“Dependence of phonation threshold pressure on vocal tract acoustics and vocal fold tissue mechanics,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2351
2362
(
2006
).
10.
J.
Lucero
,
“Relation between the phonation threshold pressure and the prephonatory glottal width in a rectangular glottis,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
2551
2554
(
1996
).
11.
J.
Lucero
,
“Optimal glottal configuration for ease of phonation,”
J. Voice
12
,
151
158
(
1998
).
12.
J.
van den Berg
,
J. T.
Zantema
, and
P.
Doornenbal
,
“On the air resistance and the Bernoulli effect of the human larynx,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
29
,
626
631
(
1957
).
13.
L.
Fulcher
and
R.
Scherer
,
“Intraglottal pressures in a static physical model of the uniform glottis: Entrance loss coefficients and viscous effects,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
3019
(
2007
).
14.
L.
Fulcher
,
R.
Scherer
, and
T.
Powell
,
“Pressure distributions in a static physical model of the uniform glottis: Entrance and exit coefficients,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
1548
1553
(
2011
).
15.
R.
Street
,
G.
Watters
, and
J.
Vennard
,
Elementary Fluid Mechanics, seventh edition
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
1996
), pp.
291
322
.
16.
J.
Jiang
and
I.
Titze
,
“A methodological study of hemilaryngeal phonation,”
Laryngoscope
103
,
872
882
(
1993
).
17.
L.
Fulcher
,
R.
Scherer
,
K.
De Witt
,
P.
Thapa
,
Y.
Bo
, and
B.
Kucinschi
,
“Pressure distributions in a static physical model of the hemilarynx: measurements and computations,”
J. Voice
24
,
2
20
(
2010
).
18.
The coefficients listed in Tables I and II of Ref. 14 were calculated from pressure distributions taken with a symmetric physical model of the larynx. Thus they are displayed in Fig. 3 as functions of the glottal diameter or glottal width. The factor-two difference between the glottal width and the glottal half-width is readily absorbed in the constants E and G. The half-width is the appropriate variable for the expansion of Eq. (16) because the constants there will be fit to the hemilarynx experiments of Chan and Titze.
19.
M.
Abramowitz
and
I.
Stegun
,
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
, (
National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series
,
1970
), pp.
896
.
20.
I.
Steinecke
, and
H.
Herzel
,
“Bifurcations in an asymmetric vocal fold model,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1874
1884
(
1995
).
21.
I.
Tokuda
,
J.
Horacek
,
J.
Svec
, and
H.
Herzel
,
“Comparison of biomechanical modeling of register transitions and voice instabilities with excised larynx experiments,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
519
531
(
2007
).
22.
I.
Titze
,
J.
Jiang
, and
T.
Hsiao
,
“Measurement of mucosal wave propagation and vertical phase difference in vocal fold vibration,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
102
,
58
63
(
1993
).
23.
B.
Story
and
I.
Titze
,
“Voice simulation with a body-cover model of the vocal folds,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1249
1260
(
1995
).
24.
This value is several times larger than that used in Ref. 21, and about twice as large as that used in Ref. 23. Nevertheless, it is not outside of the range of values that Ishizaka and Flanagan2 found to give reasonable simulations of the behavior of the vocal folds with their two-mass model.
25.
The numerical solution of Eq. (13), which includes nonlinear corrections to Eq. (17), is the correct result for comparison of the zero-inertance limit of the NLSWM becuse the expansion in inverse powers of ξ0 has not been used to obtain the equations underlying the NLSWM.
26.
R.
Street
,
G.
Watters
, and
J.
Vennard
,
Elementary Fluid Mechanics
, 7th ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1996
), pp.
690
.
27.
In Eq. (21), two typographical errors (location of kt) have been corrected.
You do not currently have access to this content.