The effects of stimulus frequency and bandwidth on distance perception were examined for nearby sources in simulated reverberant space. Sources to the side [containing reverberation-related cues and interaural level difference (ILD) cues] and to the front (without ILDs) were simulated. Listeners judged the distance of noise bursts presented at a randomly roving level from simulated distances ranging from 0.15 to 1.7 m. Six stimuli were tested, varying in center frequency (300–5700 Hz) and bandwidth (200–5400 Hz). Performance, measured as the correlation between simulated and response distances, was worse for frontal than for lateral sources. For both simulated directions, performance was inversely proportional to the low-frequency stimulus cutoff, independent of stimulus bandwidth. The dependence of performance on frequency was stronger for frontal sources. These correlation results were well summarized by considering how mean response, as opposed to response variance, changed with stimulus direction and spectrum: (1) little bias was observed for lateral sources, but listeners consistently overestimated distance for frontal nearby sources; (2) for both directions, increasing the low-frequency cut-off reduced the range of responses. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that listeners used a direction-independent but frequency-dependent mapping of a reverberation-related cue, not the ILD cue, to judge source distance.

1.
Ashmead
,
D. H.
,
Leroy
,
D.
, and
Odom
,
R. D.
(
1990
).
“Perception of the relative distances of nearby sound sources,”
Percept. Psychophys.
47
,
326
331
.
2.
Blauert
,
J.
(
1996
).
Spatial Hearing
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
), pp.
93
137
.
3.
Braida
,
L. D.
,
Lim
,
J. S.
,
Berliner
,
J. E.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
,
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
, and
Purks
,
S. R.
(
1984
).
“Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
76
,
722
731
.
4.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
(
2001
). “
Effect of stimulus properties on auditory distance perception in rooms
,” in
Physiological and Psychological Bases of Auditory Function
, edited by
D. J.
Breebaart
,
A. J. M.
Houtsma
,
A.
Kohlrausch
,
V. F.
Prijs
, and
R.
Schoonhoven
(
Shaker, Maastricht
,
The Netherlands
), pp.
184
191
.
5.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
1999
).
“Auditory distance perception in rooms,”
Nature
397
,
517
520
.
6.
Brown
,
C.
(
2002
). “T60 Matlab function.”
7.
Brungart
,
D. S.
(
1999
).
“Auditory localization of nearby sources III: Stimulus effects,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
3589
3602
.
8.
Carlile
,
S.
(
1996
).
Virtual Auditory Space: Generation and Applications
(
RG Landes
,
New York)
, pp.
109
142
.
9.
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1969
).
“Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
,
372
383
.
10.
Gardner
,
M. B.
(
1968
).
“Proximity image effect in sound localization (L),”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
43
,
163
.
11.
Gescheider
,
G. A.
(
1988
).
“Psychophysical scaling,”
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
39
,
169
200
.
12.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1990
).
“Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notchednoise data,”
Hear. Res.
47
,
103
147
.
13.
Goupell
,
M. J.
, and
Hartmann
,
W. M.
(
2007
).
“Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
1029
1045
.
14.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
(
1983
).
“Localization of sound in rooms,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
1380
1391
.
15.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
, and
Constan
,
Z. A.
(
2002
).
“Interaural level differences and the level-meter model,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
1037
1045
.
16.
Herron
,
T.
(
2005
). “C language exploratory analysis of variance with enhancements,” http://www.ebire.org/hcnlab/software/cleave.html (Last viewed Janunary 30, 2005).
17.
Larsen
,
E.
,
Iyer
,
N.
,
Lansing
,
C. R.
, and
Feng
,
A. S.
(
2008
).
“On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
450
461
.
18.
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Clifton
,
R. K.
(
1992
).
“Use of sound-pressure level in auditory distance discrimination by 6-month-old infants and adults,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
794
802
.
19.
Mershon
,
D. H.
, and
King
,
L. E.
(
1975
).
“Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance,”
Percept. Psychophys.
18
,
409
415
.
20.
Parducci
,
A.
, and
Wedell
,
D. H.
(
1986
).
“The category effect with rating-scales-number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform.
12
,
496
516
.
21.
Parker
,
S.
,
Murphy
,
D. R.
, and
Schneider
,
B. A.
(
2002
).
“Top-down gain control in the auditory system: evidence from identification and discrimination experiments,”
Percept. Psychophys.
64
,
598
615
.
22.
Petrov
,
A. A.
, and
Anderson
,
J. R.
(
2005
).
“The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification,”
Psychol. Rev.
112
,
383
416
.
23.
Rakerd
,
B.
,
Hartmann
,
W. M.
, and
McCaskey
,
T. L.
(
1999
).
“Identification and localization of sound sources in the median sagittal plane,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
2812
2820
.
24.
Santarelli
,
S.
(
2000
). “
Auditory localization of nearby sources in anechoic and reverberant environments
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Cognitive and Neural Systems Departmentment, Boston University
, Boston, MA, pp.
142
187
.
25.
Santarelli
,
S.
,
Kopco
,
N.
, and
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
(
1999
). “
Localization of near-field sources in a reverberant room
,” in
22nd mid-Winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
(St. Petersburg Beach, FL), p.
26
.
26.
Schroeder
,
M. R.
(
1965
).
“New method of measuring reverberation time,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
,
409
412
.
27.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Kopco
,
N.
, and
Martin
,
T. J.
(
2005
).
“Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: Binaural room impulse resonses,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3100
3115
.
28.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Santarelli
,
S.
, and
Kopco
,
N.
(
2000
). “
Distance perception of nearby sources in reverberant and anechoic listening conditions: Binaural vs. monaural cues
,” in
23rd mid-Winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
(St. Petersburg Beach, FL), p.
88
.
29.
Ury
,
H. K.
, and
Wiggins
,
A. D.
(
1971
).
“Large sample and other multiple comparisons among means,”
Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol.
24
,
174
194
.
30.
Zahorik
,
P.
(
2002a
).
“Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1832
1846
.
31.
Zahorik
,
P.
(
2002b
).
“Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
2110
2117
.
32.
Zahorik
,
P.
,
Brungart
,
D. S.
, and
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
(
2005
).
“Auditory distance perception in humans: A summary of past and present research,”
Acta. Acust. Acust.
91
,
409
420
.
You do not currently have access to this content.