Concert hall acoustics was evaluated with a descriptive sensory analysis method by employing an individual vocabulary development technique. The goal was to obtain sensory profiles of three concert halls by eliciting perceptual attributes for evaluation and comparison of the halls. The stimuli were gathered by playing back anechoic symphony music from 34 loudspeakers on stage in each concert hall and recording the sound field with a microphone array. Four musical programs were processed for multichannel 3D sound reproduction in the actual listening test. Twenty screened assessors developed their individual set of attributes and performed a comparative evaluation of nine seats, three in each hall. The results contain the distinctive groups of elicited attributes and show good agreement within assessors, even though they applied individual attributes when rating the samples. It was also found that loudness and distance gave the strongest perceptual direction to the principal component basis. In addition, the study revealed that the perception of reverberance is related to the size of the space or to the enveloping reverberance, depending on the assessor.

1.
H.
Lawless
and
H.
Heymann
,
Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices
(
Aspen Publishers
,
New York
,
1999
),
827
pp.
2.
W.
Sabine
, “
Reverberation: Introduction
,” Am. Arch. (
1900
) [Reprinted in W. C. Sabine,
Collected Papers on Acoustics
(
Harvard University Press
, London,
1922
), pp.
3
68
.]
3.
L.
Beranek
,
Concert and Opera Halls — How They Sound
(
Acoustical Society of America
,
New York
,
1996
),
643
pp.
4.
R.
Hawkes
and
H.
Douglas
, “
Subjective acoustics experience in concert auditoria
,”
Acustica
24
,
235
250
(
1971
).
5.
M.
Barron
, “
Subjective study of british symphony concert halls
,”
Acustica
66
,
1
14
(
1988
).
6.
E.
Kahle
,
“Validation d’un modèle objectif de la perception de la qualité acoustique dans un ensemble de salles de concerts, d’opéras (Validation of an objective model for characterizing the acoustic quality of a set of concerts hall et opera houses),”
Ph.D. thesis,
Université du Maine
, Le Mans,
1995
,
248
pages.
7.
E.
Kahle
and
J.-P.
Jullien
, “
Subjective listening tests in concert halls: Methodology and results
,” in
Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA’95)
, Vol.
2
,
521
524
(
Trondheim, Norway
,
1995
).
8.
R.
Kürer
,
G.
Plenge
, and
H.
Wilkens
, “
Correct spatial sound perception rendered by a special 2-channel recording method
,” in
the 37th Audio Engineering Society Convention
,
New York
,
1969
, paper no. 666.
9.
M.
Schroeder
,
G.
Gottlob
, and
K.
Siebrasse
, “
Comparative study of european concert halls: Correlation of subjective preference with geometric and acoustics parameters”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
1195
1201
(
1974
).
10.
L.
Cremer
and
H.
Müller
,
Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics
(
Applied Science Publishers
,
London, England
,
1982
) , Vol. 1, Chap. III.3, pp. 592–605.
11.
O.
Warusfel
,
C.
Lavandier
, and
J.
Jullien
, “
Perception of coloration and spatial effects in room acoustics
,” in
Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA’89)
,
173
176
(
Belgrade, Yugoslavia
) (
1989
).
12.
C.
Lavandier
,
“Validation perceptive d’un modèle objectif de caractérisation de la qualité acoustique des salles (Perceptual validation of an objective model for characterizing the acoustical quality of rooms),”
Ph.D. thesis,
Université du Maine
, Le Mans (
1989
),
164
pages.
13.
G.
Soulodre
and
J.
Bradley
, “
Subjective evaluation of new room acoustic measures,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
294
301
(
1995
).
14.
S.
Bech
and
N.
Zacharov
,
Perceptual Audio Evaluation - Theory, Method and Application
(
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
,
Chichester, England
,
2006
), Chap. 4.
15.
A. A.
Williams
and
S. P.
Langron
, “
The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports
,”
J. Sci. Food Agric.
35
,
558
568
(
1984
).
16.
A. A.
Williams
and
G. M.
Arnold
, “
A comparison of the aromas of six coffees characterised by conventional profiling, free-choice profiling and similarity scaling methods”
J. Sci. Food Agric.
36
,
204
214
(
1985
).
17.
D.
Thomson
and
J.
McEwan
, “
An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods”
Appetite
10
,
181
193
(
1988
).
18.
J.
Delarue
and
J.-M.
Sieffermann
, “
Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products”
Food Qual. Preference
15
,
383
392
(
2004
).
19.
G.
Lorho
, “
Individual vocabulary profiling of spatial enhancement system for stereo head phone reproduction
,” in
119th Audio Engineering Society Convention
(
New York
,
2005
), paper no. 6629.
20.
V.
Dairou
and
J.-M.
Sieffermann
, “
A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile
,”
J. Food Sci.
67
,
826
834
(
2002
).
21.
J.
Berg
and
F.
Rumsey
, “
Identification of quality attributes of spatial audio by repertory grid technique
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
54
,
365
379
(
2006
).
22.
T.
Neher
,
T.
Brookes
, and
F.
Rumsey
, “
A hybrid technique for validating unidimensionality of perceived variation in a spatial auditory stimulus set
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
54
,
259
275
(
2006
).
23.
G.
Lorho
, “
Perceptual evaluation of mobile multimedia loudspeakers
,” in
the 122nd Audio Engineering Society Convention
(
Vienna, Austria
,
2007
), paper no. 7050.
24.
A.
Kuusinen
,
H.
Vertanen
, and
T.
Lokki
, “
Assessor selection and behavior in individual vocabulary profiling of concert hall acoustics
,” in
AES 38th International Conference on Sound Quality Evaluation
(
Piteå, Sweden
,
2010
), pp.
181
190
.
25.
J.
Pätynen
,
S.
Tervo
, and
T.
Lokki
, “
A loudspeaker orchestra for concert hall studies
,” in
The Seventh International Conference On Auditorium Acoustics
,
45
52
(
Institut of Acoustics
,
Oslo, Norway
,
2008
), also published in Acoust. Bull. 34(6), 32–37 (2009).
26.
J.
Merimaa
,
“Analysis, synthesis, and perception of spatial sound – binaural localization modeling and multichannel loudspeaker reproduction,”
Ph.D. thesis, report 77,
Helsinki University of Technology
, Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing (
2006
), Chap. 2.
27.
V.
Pulkki
, “
Spatial sound reproduction with directional audio coding
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
55
,
503
516
(
2007
).
28.
J.
Vilkamo
,
T.
Lokki
, and
V.
Pulkki
, “
Directional audio coding: Virtual microphone based synthesis and subjective evaluation”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
57
,
709
724
(
2009
).
29.
M.
Gerzon
, “
Periphony: With-height sound reproduction
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
21
,
2
10
(
1973
).
30.
J.
Pätynen
,
V.
Pulkki
, and
T.
Lokki
, “
Anechoic recording system for symphony orchestra
,”
Acta Acust. Acust.
94
,
856
865
(
2008
).
31.
T.
Lokki
and
J.
Pätynen
, “
Applying anechoic recordings in auralization
,” in
EAA Symposium on Auralization
(
Espoo, Finland
,
2009
).
32.
A.
Lucas
,
amap: Another Multidimensional Analysis Package
(
2009
), available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=amap, R package version 0.8-4 (Last viewed April 8, 2010).
33.
K.
Teunissen
, “
The validity of quality indicators along a graphical scale
,” Technical Report 1077,
University of Eindhoven
,
Eindhoven, Netherlands
(
1995
).
34.
P.
Legendre
and
L.
Legendre
,
Numerical Ecology
, 2nd ed. (
Elsevier Science
,
B. V. Amsterdam, Netherlands
,
1998
), p.
378
.
35.
B.
Escofier
and
J.
Pagès
, “
Multiple factor analysis
,”
Comput. Stat. Data Anal.
18
,
121
140
(
1990
).
36.
H.
Abdi
and
D.
Valentin
, “
Multiple factor analysis
,” in
Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics
, edited by
N.
Salkind
(
Sage Publications
,
London
,
2007
), pp.
657
663
.
37.
S.
,
J.
Josse
, and
F.
Husson
, “
FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis
,”
J. Stat. Software
25
,
1
18
(
2008
).
38.
F.
Husson
,
J.
Josse
,
S.
Le
, and
J.
Mazet
,
FactoMineR: Factor Analysis and Data Mining with R
(
2009
), available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR, R package version 1.12 (Last viewed April 8, 2010).
39.
T.
Okano
,
L. L.
Beranek
, and
T.
Hidaka
, “
Relations among interaural cross-correlation coefficient (IACCE), lateral fraction (LFE), and apparent source width (ASW) in concert halls
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
255
265
(
1998
).
40.
J.
Husson
,
S.
, and
J.
Pagès
, “
Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis
,”
Food Qual. Preference
16
,
245
250
(
2005
).
41.
S. L.
Dien
and
J.
Pagès
, “
Hierarchical multiple factor analysis: application to the comparison of sensory profiles
,”
Food Qual. Preference
14
,
397
403
(
2003
).
42.
ISO
3382
-
1
:
2009
, “
Acoustics – measurement of room acoustic parameters – part 1: Performance spaces
,”
(International Standards Organization
, Geneva,
2009
).
You do not currently have access to this content.