In near-field acoustic holography sound field separation techniques make it possible to distinguish between sound coming from the two sides of the array. This is useful in cases where the sources are not confined to only one side of the array, e.g., in the presence of additional sources or reflections from the other side. This paper examines a separation technique based on measurement of the particle velocity in two closely spaced parallel planes. The purpose of the technique is to recover the particle velocity radiated by a source in the presence of disturbing sound from the opposite side of the array. The technique has been examined and compared with direct velocity based reconstruction, as well as with a technique based on the measurement of the sound pressure and particle velocity. The double layer velocity method circumvents some of the drawbacks of the pressure-velocity based reconstruction, and it can successfully recover the normal velocity radiated by the source, even in the presence of strong disturbing sound.

1.
J. D.
Maynard
,
E. G.
Williams
, and
Y.
Lee
, “
Nearfield Acoustic Holography I: Theory of generalized holography and the development of NAH
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
78
,
1395
1413
(
1985
).
2.
E. G.
Williams
,
Fourier Acoustics. Sound Radiation and Nearfield Acoustical Holography
(
Academic
,
San Diego
,
1999
), Chap. 3.
3.
G. V.
Frisk
,
A. V.
Oppenheim
, and
D. R.
Martinez
, “
A technique for measuring the plane-wave reflection coefficient of the ocean bottom
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
602
612
(
1980
).
4.
M.
Tamura
, “
Spatial Fourier transform method of measuring reflection coefficients at oblique incidence. I: Theory and numerical examples
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
2259
2264
(
1990
).
5.
J.
Hald
, “
Patch holography in cabin environments using a two-layer hand held array with an extended SONAH algorithm
,” in
Proceedings of Euronoise 2006
,
Tampere
,
Finland
(Acoustical Society of Finland, Helsinki,
2006
).
6.
F.
Jacobsen
and
V.
Jaud
, “
Statistically optimized near field acoustic holography using an array of pressure-velocity probes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
1550
1558
(
2007
).
7.
Y.-B.
Zhang
,
F.
Jacobsen
,
C.-X.
Bi
, and
X.-Z.
Chen
, “
Near field acoustic holography based on the equivalent source method and pressure-velocity transducers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
,
1257
1263
(
2009
).
8.
F.
Jacobsen
,
X.
Chen
, and
V.
Jaud
, “
A comparison of statistically optimized near field acoustic holography using single layer pressure-velocity measurements and using double layer pressure measurements (L)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
1842
1845
(
2008
).
9.
J.
Hald
, “
Basic theory and properties of statistically optimized near-field acoustical holog raphy
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am
125
,
2105
2120
(
2009
).
10.
Y.-B.
Zhang
,
X.-Z.
Chen
, and
F.
Jacobsen
, “
A sound field separation technique based on measurements with pressure-velocity probes (L)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
3518
3521
(
2009
).
11.
F.
Jacobsen
and
Y.
Liu
, “
Near field acoustic holography with particle velocity transducers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
3139
3144
(
2005
).
12.
P. C.
Hansen
,
Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion
(
SIAM
,
Philadelphia
,
1998
), Chaps. 5–7.
You do not currently have access to this content.