Colonies or communities of animals such as fishes, frogs, seabirds, or marine mammals can be noisy. Although vocal communication between clearly identified sender(s) and receiver(s) has been well studied, the properties of the noisy sound that results from the acoustic network of a colony of gregarious animals have received less attention. The resulting sound could nonetheless convey some information about the emitting group. Using custom-written software for automatic detection of vocalizations occurring over many hours of recordings, this study reports acoustic features of communal vocal activities in a gregarious species, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). By biasing the sex ratio and using two different housing conditions (individual versus communal housing), six groups of zebra finches were generated, with six different social structures that varied both in terms of sex-composition and proportion of paired individuals. The results showed that the rate of emission and the acoustic dynamic both depended on the social structure. In particular, the vocal activity of a group of zebra finches depended mainly on the number of unpaired birds, i.e., individuals not part of a stably bonded pair.
REFERENCES
1.
Aubin
, T.
, and Jouventin
, P.
(1998
). “Cocktail-party effect in king penguin colonies
,” Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci.
265
, 1665
–1673
.2.
Aubin
, T.
, and Jouventin
, P.
(2002
). “Localisation of an acoustic signal in a noisy environment: The display call of the king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus
,” J. Exp. Biol.
205
, 3793
–3798
.3.
Baker
, M. C.
(2004
). “The chorus song of cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburras (Coraciiformes, Halcyonidae: Dacelo novaeguineae): Characterization and comparison among groups
,” Ethology
110
, 21
–35
.4.
Bates
, M. E.
, Cropp
, B. F.
, Gonchar
, M.
, and Knowles
, J.
(2010
). “Spatial location influences vocal interactions in bullfrog choruses
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
127
, 2664
–2677
.5.
Clayton
, D. F.
, Balakrishnan
, C. N.
, and London
, S. E.
(2009
). “Integrating genomes, brain and behavior in the study of songbirds
,” Curr. Biol.
19
, R865
–R873
.6.
D’spain
, G. L.
, and Berger
, L. P.
(2004
). “Unusual spatiotemporal patterns in fish chorusing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
, 2559
–2259
.7.
Elie
, J. E.
, Mariette
, M. M.
, Soula
, H. A.
, Griffith
, S. C.
, Mathevon
, N.
, and Vignal
, C.
(2010
). “Vocal communication at nest between mates in wild zebra finches: A private vocal duet
,” Anim. Behav.
80
, 597
–605
.8.
Evans
, C. S.
, and Marler
, P.
(1994
). “Food calling and audience effects in male chickens, Gallus gallus: Their relationships to food availability, courtship and social facilitation
,” Anim. Behav.
47
, 1159
–1170
.9.
Farabaugh
, S. M.
(1982
). “The ecological and social significance of duetting
,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds,
edited by D. E.
Kroodsma
and E. H.
Miller
(Academic
, New York
), pp. 85
–124
.10.
Frommolt
, K.-H.
(1999
). “Acoustic structure of chorus howling in wolves and consequences for sound propagation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 1203
–1203
.11.
Hall
, M. L.
(2000
). “The function of duetting in magpie-larks: Conflict, cooperation, or commitment?
,” Anim. Behav.
60
, 667
–677
.12.
Hall
, M. L.
(2004
). “A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
55
, 415
–430
.13.
Hall
, M. L.
, and Magrath
, R. D.
(2007
). “Temporal coordination signals coalition qualitiy
,” Curr. Biol.
17
, R406
–R407
.14.
Harrington
, F. H.
, and Mech
, L. D.
(1979
). “Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance
,” Behaviour
68
, 207
–249
.15.
Jones
, D. L.
, Jones
, R. L.
, and Ratman
, R.
(2009
). “Dynamical interactions in a green treefrog chorus
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 2270
–2270
.16.
Leis
, J. M.
, Carson-Ewart
, B. M.
, and Cato
, D. H.
(2002
). “Sound detection in situ by the larvae of a coral-ref damselfish (Pomacentridae)
,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
232
, 259
–268
.17.
Locascio
, J. V.
(2004
). “Diel periodicity of fish sound production in Charlotte Harbor, Florida
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
, 2640
–2640
.18.
Locascio
, J. V.
, and Mann
, D. A.
(2005
). “Effects of Hurricane Charley on fish chorusing
,” Biol. Lett.
1
, 362
–365
.19.
Mann
, D. A.
(2003
). “Patterns of fish sound production
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 2275
–2275
.20.
Marshall
, V.
(2003
). “The chorus environment and the shape of communication systems in frogs
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
, 2275
–2275
.21.
McComb
, K.
(1992
). “Playback as a tool for studying contests between social groups
,” in Playback and Studies of Animal Communication
, edited by P. K.
McGregor
(Plenum Press
, New York
), pp. 111
–119
.22.
McComb
, K.
, Packer
, C.
, and Pusey
, A.
(1994
). “Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo
,” Anim. Behav.
47
, 379
–387
.23.
McGregor
, P. K.
(2005
). “Introduction
,” in Animal Communication Networks
, edited by P. K.
McGregor
(Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge
), pp. 1
–6
.24.
Mennill
, D. J
, Ratcliffe
, L. M.
, and Boag
, P. T.
(2002
). “Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds
,” Science
296
, 873
.25.
Mitani
, J. C.
(1984
). “Gibbon song duets and intergroup spacing
,” Behaviour
92
, 59
–95
.26.
Schusterman
, R. J.
(1978
). “Vocal communication in pinnipeds
,” in Behavior of Captive Wild Animals
edited by H.
Markowitz
and V. J.
Stevens
(Nelson-Hall
, Chicago, IL
), pp. 247
–307
.27.
Seddon
, N.
, and Tobias
, J. A.
(2006
). “Duets defend mates in a suboscine passerine, the warbling antbird (Hypocnemis cantator)
,” Behav. Ecol.
17
, 73
–83
.28.
See supplemental material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3570959 Document No. for all the sound samples (of type “wav”). For more information see http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html
29.
Simmons
, A. M.
, Bates
, M. E.
, and Knowles
, J.
(2009
). “Non-random patterns of acoustic interactions in chorusing bullfrogs
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
126
, 2270
–2270
.30.
Simpson
, S. D.
, Meekan
, M. G.
, McCauley
, R. D.
, and Jeffs
, A.
(2004
). “Attraction of settlement-stage coral reef fishes to reef noise
,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
276
, 263
–268
.31.
Southall
, B. L.
, Schusterman
, R. J.
, , and Kastak
, D.
(2003
). “Acoustic communication ranges for northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris)
,” Aquat. Mamm.
29
, 202
–213
.32.
Vignal
, C.
, Mathevon
, N.
, and Mottin
, S.
(2004
). “Audience drives male songbird response to partner’s voice
,” Nature
430
, 448
–451
.33.
Vignal
, C.
, Mathevon
, N.
, and Mottin
, S.
(2008
). “Mate recognition by female zebra finch: Analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process
,” Behav. Processes
77
, 191
–198
.34.
Whitehead
, H.
, and Dufault
, S.
(1999
). “Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: Review and recommendations
,” Adv. Study Behav.
28
, 33
–74
.35.
Zann
, R. A.
(1996
). The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies
(Oxford University Press
, Oxford
), p. 335
.© 2011 Acoustical Society of America.
2011
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
