The variation of wind noise at hearing-aid microphones with wind speed, wind azimuth, and hearing-aid style was investigated. Comparisons were made across behind-the-ear (BTE) and completely-in-canal (CIC) devices, and between microphones within BTE devices. One CIC device and two BTE devices were placed on a Knowles Electronics Manikin for Acoustic Research. The smaller BTE device had vented plastic windshields around its microphone ports while the larger BTE device had none. The microphone output signals were digitally recorded in wind generated at 0, 3, 6, and 12 m/s at 8 wind azimuths. The microphone output signals were saturated at 12 m/s with wind-noise levels of up to 116 dB SPL at the microphone output. Wind-noise levels differed by up to 12 dB between microphones within the same BTE device, and across BTE devices by up to 6 or 8 dB for front or rear microphones, respectively. On average, wind-noise levels were lowest with the CIC device and highest at the rear microphone of the smaller BTE device. Engineering and clinical implications are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2011
June 14 2011
Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturationa) Available to Purchase
Justin A. Zakis
Justin A. Zakis
b)
Dynamic Hearing Pty Ltd.
, 2 Chapel Street, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Justin A. Zakis
b)
Dynamic Hearing Pty Ltd.
, 2 Chapel Street, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia
b)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
a)
Portions of this work were presented in “An analysis of wind noise at the front and rear microphones of hearing aids,” poster presented at The International Hearing-Aid Conference 2010, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, 11–15 August 2010.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 3897–3907 (2011)
Article history
Received:
December 07 2010
Accepted:
March 23 2011
Citation
Justin A. Zakis; Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 June 2011; 129 (6): 3897–3907. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3578453
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2009)
Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2010)
Wind noise within and across behind-the-ear and miniature behind-the-ear hearing aids
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2015)
Acoustic factors affecting interaural level differences for cochlear-implant users
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2020)
Comparisons of spectral characteristics of wind noise between omnidirectional and directional microphones
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2012)