The present study examined auditory distance perception cues in a non-territorial songbird, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), and in a non-songbird, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). Using operant conditioning procedures, three zebra finches and three budgerigars were trained to identify 1- (Near) and 75-m (Far) recordings of three budgerigar contact calls, one male zebra finch song, and one female zebra finch call. Once the birds were trained on these endpoint stimuli, other stimuli were introduced into the operant task. These stimuli included recordings at intermediate distances and artificially altered stimuli simulating changes in overall amplitude, high-frequency attenuation, reverberation, and all three cues combined. By examining distance cues (amplitude, high-frequency attenuation, and reverberation) separately, this study sought to determine which cue was the most salient for the birds. The results suggest that both species could scale the stimuli on a continuum from Near to Far and that amplitude was the most important cue for these birds in auditory distance perception, as in humans and other animals.

1.
Coleman
,
P. D.
(
1963
). “
An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space
,”
Psychol. Bull.
60
,
302
315
.
2.
Ingard
,
U.
(
1953
). “
A review of the influence of meteorological conditions on sound propagation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
25
,
405
411
.
3.
McGregor
,
P. K.
,
Krebs
,
J. R.
, and
Ratcliffe
,
L. M.
(
1983
). “
The reaction of great tits ( Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: The effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type
,”
Auk
100
,
898
906
.
4.
Mershon
,
D. H.
, and
Bowers
,
J. N.
(
1979
). “
Absolute and relative cues for the auditory perception of egocentric distance
,”
Perception
8
,
311
322
.
5.
Naguib
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifics in Carolina wrens: The role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation
,”
Anim. Behav.
50
,
1297
1307
.
6.
Naguib
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Auditory distance estimation in song birds: Implications, methodologies, and perspectives
,”
Behav. Processes
38
,
163
168
.
7.
Naguib
,
M.
(
1997
). “
Use of song amplitude for ranging in Carolina wrens, Thryothorus ludovicianus
,”
Ethology
103
,
723
731
.
8.
Naguib
,
M.
(
1998
). “
Perception of degradation in acoustic signals and its implication for ranging
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
42
,
139
142
.
9.
Naguib
,
M.
(
2003
). “
Reverberation of rapid and slow trills: Implications for signal adaptation to long-range communication
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1749
1756
.
10.
Naguib
,
M.
, and
Wiley
,
R. H.
(
2001
). “
Estimating the distance to a source of sound: Mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication
,”
Anim. Behav.
62
,
825
837
.
11.
Naguib
,
M.
,
Klump
,
G. M.
,
Hillmann
,
E.
,
Griebmann
,
B.
, and
Teige
,
T.
(
2000
). “
Assessment of auditory distance in a territorial songbird: Accurate feat or rule of thumb?
Anim. Behav.
59
,
715
721
.
12.
Nelson
,
B. S.
, and
Stoddard
,
P. K.
(
1998
). “
Accuracy of auditory distance and azimuth perception by a passerine bird in natural habitat
,”
Anim. Behav.
56
,
467
477
.
13.
Padgham
,
M.
(
2004
). “
Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests—implications for acoustic communication in animals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
402
410
.
14.
Phillmore
,
L. S.
,
Sturdy
,
C. B.
,
Ramsay
,
S. M.
, and
Weisman
,
R. G.
(
1998
). “
Discrimination of auditory distance cues by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)
,”
J. Comp. Psychol.
112
,
282
291
.
15.
Phillmore
,
L. S.
,
Sturdy
,
C. B.
, and
Weisman
,
R. G.
(
2003
). “
Does reduced social contact affect discrimination of distance cues and individual vocalizations?
Anim. Behav.
65
,
911
922
.
16.
Richards
,
D. G.
, and
Wiley
,
R. H.
(
1980
). “
Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: Implications for animal communication
,”
Am. Nat.
115
,
381
399
.
17.
Wiley
,
R. H.
, and
Richards
,
D. G.
(
1982
). “
Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection
,” in
Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. II
, edited by
D. E.
Kroodsma
and
E. H.
Miller
(Academic Press
,
New York)
, pp.
131
181
.
18.
Wiley
,
R. H.
(
2006
). “
Signal detection and animal communication
,”
Adv. Study Behav.
36
,
217
247
.
19.
Zahorik
,
P.
(
2002
). “
Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1832
1846
.
You do not currently have access to this content.