A recently published one-parameter ground model based on Darcy’s law is here generalized into a two-parameter model which depends on an effective flow resistivity and an effective layer depth. Extensive field measurements of the acoustic impedance of various ground types have been carried out for frequencies in the range from 200 Hz to 2.5 kHz. The model based on Darcy’s law gives an improved fit to the measurements compared to the Delany–Bazley model. It is, in addition, argued on purely theoretical grounds that the suggested model is preferable. In contrast to the Delany–Bazley model it corresponds to a proper causal time-domain model. This is particularly relevant for extrapolation of the models to lower frequencies and for the recently developed harmonized methods intended for use in the implementation of the European Union directive on the assessment and management of environmental noise. The harmonized methods include frequencies down to the 25 Hz third octave band and have the Delany–Bazley ground impedance model as the default choice. The arguments presented here suggest that this default choice should be replaced by the more physically based model from the law of Darcy.

1.
T. F. W.
Embleton
,
J. E.
Piercy
, and
N.
Olson
, “
Outdoor sound propagation over ground of finite impedance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
,
267
277
(
1976
).
2.
J.
Krag
,
B.
Plovsing
,
S.
Storeheier
,
G.
Taraldsen
, and
H. G.
Jonasson
, “
Nordic environmental noise prediction methods. Nord2000 summary report. General Nordic sound propagation model and applications in source-related prediction methods
,” Technical Report No. 1719/01,
DELTA Acoustics and Vibration
(
2002
).
3.
D.
Maercke
and
J.
Defrance
, “
Development of an analytical model for outdoor sound propagation within the harmonoise project
,”
Acta. Acust. Acust.
93
,
201
212
(
2007
).
4.
J. W. S.
Rayleigh
,
The Theory of Sound
, 2nd ed. (
Dover
,
New York
,
1896
) (reprinted in 1945), Vol.
II
, pp.
78
86
.
5.
A.
Sommerfeld
, “
Über die ausbreitung der wellen in der drahtlosen telegraphie (On the propagation of waves for the wireless telegraphy)
,”
Ann. Phys. Leipzig
28
,
665
737
(
1909
).
6.
I.
Milford
, “
Noise mapping of public roads in Norway: New calculation tool based on the Nord2000 road engineering method
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
3136
(
2008
).
7.
G.
Taraldsen
, “
The Delany–Bazley impedance model and Darcy’s law
,”
Acta. Acust. Acust.
91
,
41
50
(
2005
).
8.
See supplemental material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3500694 Document No. E-JASMAN-128-021012 for measurement data and pictures of measurement sites. For more information see http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html.
9.
C. T.
Simmons
, “
Editor’s message: Happy 200th birthday Mr Darcy and our thanks for your law! A tribute editorial celebrating the life and times of the father of our science, Henry Darcy (1803–1858)
,”
Hydrogeol. J.
11
,
611
614
(
2003
).
10.
P. M.
Morse
and
K. U.
Ingard
,
Theoretical Acoustics
(
Princeton University
,
Princeton, NJ
,
1968
) (reprinted in 1986), pp.
252
255
.
11.
D. A. G.
Bruggeman
, “
Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen (Calculation of physical constants of heterogeneous materials)
,”
Ann. Physik.
24
,
636
679
(
1935
).
12.
K.
Attenborough
, “
Models for the acoustical properties of air-filled granular materials
,”
Acta Acust.
1
,
213
226
(
1993
).
13.
O.
Umnova
,
K.
Attenborough
, and
K.
Li
, “
Cell model calculations of dynamic drag parameters in packings of spheres
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
3113
3119
(
2000
).
14.
A.
Khaled
and
K.
Vafai
, “
Review: The role of porous media in modeling flow and heat transfer in biological tissues
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
46
,
4989
5003
(
2003
).
15.
J. G.
Berryman
, “
Confirmation of Biot’s theory
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
37
,
383
385
(
1980
).
16.
NT ACOU 104
: “
Ground surfaces: Determination of the acoustic impedance
,” in
Nordtest Method
(
Nordic Innovation Centre
,
Espoo, Finland
,
1999
).
17.
ANSI S1.18-1999 (R 2004)
:
Template method for ground impedance
(
American National Standard Institute
,
New York
,
1999
).
18.
G.
Taraldsen
, “
The complex image method
,”
Wave Motion
43
,
91
97
(
2005
).
19.
C. F.
Chien
and
W. W.
Soroka
, “
A note on the calculation of sound-propagation along an impedance surface
,”
J. Sound Vib.
69
,
340
343
(
1980
).
20.
G.
Taraldsen
, “
A note on reflection of spherical waves
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3389
3392
(
2005
).
21.
ISO Guide 98-3
: “
Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (gum: 1995)
,” in
Standard
(
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
2008
).
22.
E.
Mommertz
, “
Angle-dependent in-situ measurements of reflection coefficients using a subtraction technique
,”
Appl. Acoust.
46
,
251
263
(
1995
).
23.
C.
Nocke
,
V.
Mellert
,
T.
Waters-Fuller
,
K.
Attenborough
, and
K. M.
Li
, “
Impedance deduction from broad-band, point-source measurements at grazing incidence
,”
Acta. Acust.
83(6)
,
1085
1090
(
1997
).
24.
S.
Taherzadeh
and
K.
Attenborough
, “
Deduction of ground impedance from measurements of excess attenuation spectra
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2039
2042
(
1999
).
You do not currently have access to this content.