Reports of audible vocalizations are rare in adult muroid rodents, animals generally very small in body size and under strong predation pressure. By contrast, communication using high, often ultrasonic vocal frequencies is relatively common. There are anecdotal reports of audible vocalizations for some harvest mice (genus Reithrodontomys), however none have been recorded or analyzed. Several species of harvest mice are studied, representing the subgenera Reithrodontomys (R. fulvescens, R. sumichrasti) and Aporodon (R. creper, R. mexicanus, R. spp.), as part of a larger phylogenetic analysis of stereotypical vocal communication. Only R. mexicanus produced stereotyped vocalizations on a regular basis. Acoustic signals of R. mexicanus contain prominent harmonics bridging both the audible and ultrasonic range, with evidence of non-linear distribution of energy within and between notes of an individual call. Harmonic emphasis varies, making the carrier frequency difficult to locate. These Reithrodontomys vocalizations are compared with members of their phylogenetic sister group Onychomys+Peromyscus, genera whose stereotypic calls exclusively occupy the audible or ultrasonic spectrum, respectively. It is hypothesized that the stereotypic signals of harvest mice represent announcement calls. Given the number of anecdotal reports of stereotyped 1, 2, and 3-note calls among Reithrodontomys species, further interspecific comparisons are warranted.

1.
M. B.
Fenton
,
Communication in the Chiroptera
(
Indiana University Press
,
Bloomington, IN
,
1985
).
2.
G.
Neuweiler
,
The Biology of Bats
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
2002
).
3.
W. E.
Evans
, “
Echolocation by marine delphinids and one species of freshwater dolphin
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
54
,
191
199
(
1973
).
4.
A. N.
Popper
, “
Sound emission and detection by delphinids
,” in
Cetacean Behavior: Mechanisms and Function
, edited by
L. M.
Herman
(
Krieger
,
Malabar, FL
,
1980
), Chap. 1, pp.
1
52
.
5.
S.
Churchfield
,
The Natural History of Shrews
(
Cornell University Press
,
Ithaca, NY
,
1990
).
6.
T.
Tomasi
, “
Echolocation by the short tailed shrew Blarina brevicauda
,”
J. Mammal.
60
,
751
759
(
1979
).
7.
J. A.
Thomas
, and
M. S.
Jalili
, “
Echolocation in insectivores and rodents
,” in
Echolocation in Bats and Dolphins
, edited by
J. A.
Thomas
,
C.
Moss
, and
M.
Vater
, (
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago, IL
,
2002
), Chap. 72, pp.
547
563
.
8.
G. D.
Sewell
, “
Ultrasound in rodents
,”
Nature (London)
227
,
410
(
1970
).
9.
G. D.
Sales
and
J. D.
Pye
,
Ultrasonic Communication by Animals
(
Chapman and Hall
,
London
,
1974
).
10.
D. R.
Wilson
and
J. F.
Hare
, “
Ground squirrel uses ultrasonic alarms
,”
Nature (London)
430
,
523
(
2004
).
11.
J. G.
Nyby
and
G.
Whitney
, “
Ultrasonic communication of adult myomorph rodents
,”
Neurosci. Biobehav Rev.
2
,
1
14
(
1978
).
12.
M.
Silva
and
A.
Downing
,
CRC Handbook of Mammalian Body Masses
(
CRC
,
Boca Raton, FL
,
1995
).
13.
R. J.
Dooling
, “
Hearing in birds
,” in
The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing
, edited by
D.
Webster
,
R.
Fay
, and
A.
Popper
(
Springer
,
New York
.
1991
), pp.
545
559
.
14.
G.
Dücker
, “
Beobachtungen über das Paarungsverhalten des Ichneumons (Herpestes ichneumon L.) (Observations of the mating behavior of Ichneumon (Herpestes ichneumon L.)
,”
Zeitschrift fuer Saeugetierkunde
25
,
47
51
(
1960
).
15.
E. P.
Edwards
, “
Hearing ranges of four species of birds
,”
Auk
60
,
239
241
(
1942
).
16.
H. E.
Heffner
, “
Hearing in large and small dogs: Absolute thresholds and size of the tympanic membrane
,”
Behav. Neurosci.
97
,
310
318
(
1983
).
17.
E. T.
Hooper
and
M. D.
Carleton
, “
Reproduction, growth and development in two contiguously allopatric rodent species, Genus Scotinomys
,”
Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich.
151
,
1
52
(
1976
).
18.
J. R.
Miller
and
M. D.
Engstrom
, “
Vocal stereotypy and singing behavior in Baiomyine mice
,”
J. Mammal.
88
,
1447
1465
(
2007
).
19.
M. C.
Kalcounis-Rueppell
,
J. D.
Metheny
, and
M. J.
Vonhof
, “
Production of ultrasonic vocalizations by Peromyscus mice in the wild
,”
Front. Zool.
3
,
3
(
2006
).
20.
R. W.
Nowak
,
Walker’s Mammals of the World
, 6th ed. (
John Hopkins University Press
,
Baltimore, MD
,
1999
).
21.
F. A.
Reid
,
A Field Guide to the Mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1997
).
22.
F. A.
Reid
and
C. A.
Langtimm
, “
Distributional and natural history notes for selected mammals from Costa Rica
,”
Southwest. Nat.
38
,
299
302
(
1993
).
23.
F. A.
Reid
,
A Field Guide to the Mammals of North America
(
Houghton Mifflin
,
New York
,
2006
).
24.
R. D.
Svihla
, “
Notes on the golden harvest mouse
,”
J. Mammal.
11
,
53
55
(
1930
).
25.
G. G.
Musser
and
M. D.
Carleton
, “
Superfamily muroidea
,” in
Mammal Species of the World
, 3rd ed., edited by
D. E.
Wilson
and
D. M.
Reeder
(
John Hopkins University Press
,
Baltimore, MD
,
2005
), pp.
894
1531
.
26.
J. R.
Miller
and
M. D.
Engstrom
, “
The relationships of major lineages within peromyscine rodents: A molecular phylogenetic hypothesis and systematic reappraisal
,”
J. Mammal.
89
,
1279
1295
(
2008
).
27.
T. J.
Brown
and
P.
Handford
, “
Sound design for vocalizations: Quality in the woods, consistency in the fields
,”
Condor
102
,
81
92
(
2000
).
28.
K.
Marten
and
P.
Marler
, “
Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
2
,
291
302
(
1977
).
29.
N.
Seddon
, “
Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds
,”
Evolution
59
,
200
215
(
2005
).
30.
R. H.
Wiley
and
D. G.
Richards
, “
Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
8
,
41
46
(
1978
).
31.
E. A.
Brenowitz
, “
Long-range communication of species identity by song in the red-winged blackbird
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
10
,
29
38
(
1982
).
32.
A.
Michelsen
, “
Sound reception in different environments
,” in
Sensory Ecology: Review and Perspectives
, edited by
M. A.
Ali
(
Plenum
,
New York
,
1978
), pp.
345
373
.
33.
B.
Lewis
,
Bioacoustics: A Comparative Approach
(
Academic
,
Toronto
,
1983
).
34.
J. M.
Terhune
, “
Directional hearing of a harbour seal in air and water
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
1862
1865
(
1974
).
35.
J. L.
Sloan
,
D. R.
Wilson
, and
J. F.
Hare
, “
Functional morphology of Richardson’s ground squirrel, Spermophilus richardsonii, alarm calls: The meaning of chirps, whistles and chucks
,”
Anim. Behav.
70
,
937
944
(
2005
).
36.
E. S.
Morton
, “
Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds
,”
Am. Nat.
109
,
17
34
(
1975
).
37.
M. J.
Ryan
and
E. A.
Brenowitz
, “
The role of body size, phylogeny and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song
,”
Am. Nat.
126
,
87
100
(
1985
).
38.
M.
Ryan
, “
Environmental bioacoustics: Evaluation of a commonly used experimental design
,”
Anim. Behav.
34
,
931
933
(
1986
).
39.
E. S.
Morton
, “
On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds
,”
Am. Nat.
111
,
855
869
(
1977
).
40.
J.
Burgdorf
,
B.
Knutson
,
P.
Panksepp
, and
T. S.
Shippenberg
, “
Evaluation of rat ultrasonic vocalizations as predictors of the conditioned aversive effects of drugs
,”
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
155
,
35
42
(
2001
).
41.
J.
Panksepp
and
J.
Bergdorf
, “
Laughing’ rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy?
,”
Psychol. Behav.
79
,
533
547
(
2003
).
42.
F. H.
Harrington
, and
L. D.
Mech
, “
Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance
,”
Behaviour
68
,
207
249
(
1979
).
43.
P.
Marler
, “
Aggregation and dispersal: Two functions in primate communication
,” in
Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability
, edited by
P. C.
Jay
(
Holt, Rinehart and Winston
,
New York
,
1968
) pp.
420
438
.
44.
G.
Peters
and
W. C.
Wozencraft
, “
Acoustic communication by fissiped carnivores
,” in
Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution
, edited by
J.
Gittleman
(
Cornell University Press
,
Ithaca, NY
,
1989
), Vol.
1
, Chap. 1, pp.
14
56
.
45.
T. G.
Finley
, “
Vocalizations of the northern grasshopper mouse
,” MSc. thesis,
University of Arkansas
, Little Rock, AR (
2003
).
46.
W. B.
Broughton
, “
Methods in bioacoustic terminology
,” in
Acoustic Behavior of Animals
, edited by
R. G.
Busnel
(
Elsevier
,
London
,
1963
), Chap. 1, pp.
1
24
.
47.
W. L.
Gannon
and
R. S.
Sikes
, and the
Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists
, “
Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild animals in research
,”
J. Mammal.
88
,
809
823
(
2007
).
48.
E. S.
Morton
and
D. H.
Owings
,
Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
,
1998
).
49.
P. V.
August
and
J. G. T.
Anderson
, “
Mammal sounds and motivation-structural rules: A test of the hypothesis
,”
J. Mammal.
68
,
1
9
(
1987
).
50.
S. J.
Sterbing
, “
Postnatal development of vocalizations and hearing in the phyllostomid bat, Carollia perspicillata
,”
J. Mammal.
83
,
516
525
(
2002
).
51.
A.
Surlykke
and
C. F.
Moss
, “
Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
2419
2429
(
2000
).
52.
P. M.
Narins
,
A. S.
Feng
,
W.
Lin
,
H. -U.
Schnitzler
,
A.
Denzinger
,
R. A.
Suthers
, and
C.
Xu
, “
Old World frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
910
913
(
2004
).
53.
T.
Riede
,
E.
Bronsen
,
H.
Hatzikirou
, and
K.
Zuberbühler
, “
Vocal production mechanisms in a non-human primate: Morphological data and model
,”
J. Hum. E
0047–2984
48
,
85
96
(
2005
).
54.
J.
Podos
, “
Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches
,”
Nature (London)
409
,
185
188
(
2001
).
55.
W. J.
Hoese
,
J.
Podos
,
N. C.
Boetticher
, and
S.
Nowacki
, “
Vocal tract function in bird song production: Experimental manipulation of beak movements
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
203
,
1845
1855
(
2000
).
56.
J.
Podos
,
J. A.
Southall
, and
M. R.
Rossi-Santos
, “
Vocal mechanics in Darwin’s finches: Correlation of beak gape and song frequency
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
207
,
607
619
(
2004
).
57.
T.
Riede
,
R. A.
Suthers
,
N. H.
Fletcher
, and
W. E.
Blevins
, “
Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
103
,
5543
5548
(
2006
).
58.
G.
Fant
,
Acoustic Theory of Speech Production
(
Mouton
,
The Hague, The Netherlands
,
1960
).
59.
G. J. L.
Beckers
,
R. A.
Suthers
, and
C.
ten Cate
, “
Pure-tone birdsong by resonance filtering of harmonic overtones
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
100
,
7372
7376
(
2003
).
60.
I.
Titze
,
T.
Reide
, and
P.
Popolo
, “
Non-linear source-filter coupling in phonation: Vocal exercises
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
1902
1915
(
2008
).
61.
C.
Darwin
,
The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals
(
John Murray
,
London, UK
,
1872
).
62.
N.
Mathevon
,
T.
Aubin
, and
T.
Dabelsteen
, “
Song degradation during propagation: Importance of the song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes
,”
Ethology
102
,
397
412
(
1996
).
63.
V.
Bailey
and
C. C.
Sperry
, “
Life history and habits of grasshopper mice, genus Onychomys
,”
U.S. Depart. Agr. Tech. Bull.
145
,
1
19
(
1929
).
64.
H. J.
Egoscue
, “
Laboratory and field studies of the northern grasshopper mouse
,”
J. Mammal.
41
,
99
110
(
1960
).
65.
M. S.
Hafner
and
D. J.
Hafner
, “
Vocalizations of grasshopper mice (genus Onychomys)
,”
J. Mammal.
60
,
85
94
(
1979
).
66.
J.
Sundberg
,
The Science of the Singing Voice
(
Northern Illinois University Press
,
Dekalb, IL
,
1987
).
67.
C. F.
Hockett
, “
Logistical considerations in the study of animal communication
,” in
Animal Sounds and Communication
, edited by
W. E.
Lanyon
and
W. N.
Tavolga
(
American Institute of Biological Sciences
,
Washington, DC
,
1960
), Publication No. 7, pp.
392
430
You do not currently have access to this content.