Previous work has shown that accents affect speech recognition accuracy in noise, with intelligibility being modulated by the similarity between the talkers' and listeners' accents, particularly in the case where they have different L1s. The present study examined the contribution of prosody to recognizing native (L1) and non-native (L2) speech in noise, and how this is affected by the listener's L2 experience. A group of monolingual English listeners and two groups of French listeners with varying L2 English experience were presented with English sentences produced by L1 and L2 (French) speakers. The stimuli were digitally processed to exchange the pitch and segment durations between recordings of the same sentences produced by different speakers (e.g., imposing a French-accented prosody onto recordings made from English speakers). The results revealed that English listeners were more accurate at recognizing L1 English with English prosody, the French inexperienced listeners were more accurate at recognizing French-accented speech with French prosody, and the French experienced listeners varied in the cues that they used depending on the noise level, showing more flexibility of processing. The use of prosodic cues in noise thus appears to be modulated by language experience and varies according to listening context.

1.
Allan
,
D.
(
1992
).
Oxford Placement Tests 1
(
Oxford University Press
,
United Kingdom
).
2.
Anderson-Hsieh
,
J.
,
Johnson
,
R.
, and
Koehler
,
K.
(
1992
). “
The relationship between native speaker judgements of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure
,”
Lang. Learn.
42
,
529
555
.
3.
Bench
,
J.
,
Kowal
,
A.
, and
Bamford
,
J.
(
1979
). “
The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
13
,
108
112
.
4.
Bent
,
T.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2003
). “
The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
,
1600
1610
.
5.
Bent
,
T.
,
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, and
Smith
,
B.
(
2008
). “
Production and perception of temporal patterns in native and non-native speech
,”
Phonetica
65
,
131
147
.
6.
Bradley
,
D. C.
,
Sanchez-Casas
,
R. M.
, and
Garcia-Albea
,
J. E.
(
1993
). “
The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English
,”
Lang. Cognit. Processes
8
,
197
233
.
7.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1999
). “
Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
2074
2085
.
8.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Mehler
,
J.
,
Norris
,
D.
, and
Segui
,
J.
(
1986
). “
The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
25
,
385
400
.
9.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Mehler
,
J.
,
Norris
,
D.
, and
Segui
,
J.
(
1989
). “
Limits on bilingualism
,”
Nature (London)
340
,
229
230
.
10.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Mehler
,
J.
,
Norris
,
D.
, and
Segui
,
J.
(
1992
). “
The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals
,”
Cognit Psychol.
24
,
381
410
.
11.
Cutler
,
A.
, and
Otake
,
T.
(
1994
). “
Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
33
,
824
844
.
12.
Flege
,
J. E.
(
1993
). “
Production and perception of a novel, 2nd-language phonetic contrast
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
1589
1608
.
13.
Flege
,
J. E.
(
1995
). “
Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems
,” in
Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research
, edited by
W.
Strange
(
York
,
Baltimore, MD
), pp.
233
277
.
14.
Flege
,
J. E.
,
MacKay
,
I. R. A.
, and
Meador
,
D.
(
1999
). “
Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
2973
2987
.
15.
Florentine
,
M.
,
Buus
,
S.
,
Scharf
,
B.
, and
Canevet
,
G.
(
1984
). “
Speech reception thresholds in noise for native and non-native listeners (A)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
75
,
S84
.
16.
Goetry
,
V.
, and
Kolinsky
,
R.
(
2000
). “
The role of rhythmic cues for speech segmentation in monolingual and bilingual listeners
,”
Psychol. Belg.
40
,
115
152
.
17.
Hayes-Harb
,
R.
,
Smith
,
B. L.
,
Bent
,
T.
, and
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2008
). “
The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts
,”
J. Phonetics
36
,
664
679
.
18.
Holm
,
S.
(
2007
). “
The relative contributions of intonation and duration to intelligibility in Norwegian as a second language
,” in
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences
, Saarbrucken, Germany, pp.
1653
1656
.
19.
Huckvale
,
M.
(
2006
).
Speech Filing System
(
UCL
,
London, UK
).
20.
Imai
,
S.
,
Walley
,
A. C.
, and
Flege
,
J. E.
(
2005
). “
Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects of the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
896
907
.
21.
Kamiyama
,
T.
(
2004
). “
Perception of foreign accentedness in L2 prosody and segments: L1 Japanese speakers learning L2 French
,”
Speech Prosody
(
ISCA Archive
,
Nara, Japan
).
22.
Lane
,
H.
(
1963
). “
Foreign accent and speech distortion
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
,
451
453
.
23.
Mattys
,
S. L.
,
White
,
L.
, and
Melhorn
,
J. F.
(
2005
). “
Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.
134
,
477
500
.
24.
Mayo
,
L. H.
,
Florentine
,
M.
, and
Buus
,
S.
(
1997
). “
Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
40
,
686
693
.
25.
Meador
,
D.
,
Flege
,
J.
, and
MacKay
,
I.
(
2000
). “
Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language
,”
Bilingualism: Lang. Cognit.
3
,
55
67
.
26.
Munro
,
M.
(
1998
). “
The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech
,”
Stud. Second Lang. Acquis.
20
,
139
154
.
27.
Rogers
,
C. L.
,
Lister
,
J. J.
,
Febo
,
D. M.
,
Besing
,
J. M.
, and
Abrams
,
H. B.
(
2006
). “
Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing
,”
Appl. Psycholinguist.
27
,
465
485
.
28.
Sanders
,
L. D.
,
Neville
,
H. J.
, and
Woldorff
,
M. G.
(
2002
). “
Speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers: The use of lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
519
530
.
29.
Stibbard
,
R. M.
, and
Lee
,
J. I.
(
2006
). “
Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
433
442
.
30.
Tajima
,
K.
,
Port
,
R.
, and
Dalby
,
J.
(
1997
). “
Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English
,”
J. Phonetics
25
,
1
24
.
31.
van Wijngaarden
,
S. J.
(
2001
). “
Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech
,”
Speech Commun.
35
,
103
113
.
32.
van Wijngaarden
,
S. J.
,
Steeneken
,
H. J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2002
). “
Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1906
1916
.
You do not currently have access to this content.