In a previous study, three crosstalk cancellation techniques were evaluated and compared under different conditions. Least-squares approximations in the frequency and time domain were evaluated along with a method based on minimum-phase decomposition and a frequency independent delay. In general, the least-squares methods outperformed the method based on the minimum-phase decomposition. However, the evaluation was only done for the best-case scenario, where the transfer functions used to design the filters correspond to the listener’s transfer functions and his/her location and orientation relative to the loudspeakers. This paper presents a follow-up evaluation of the performance of the three inversion techniques when the above mentioned conditions are relaxed. A setup to measure the sweet spot of different loudspeaker arrangements is described. The sweet spot was measured for 21 different loudspeaker configurations, including two- and four-channel setups. Lateral and frontal displacement were measured along with head rotations. The setups were evaluated at different elevation angles. The results suggest that when the loudspeakers are placed at elevated positions, a wider effective area is obtained. Additionally, the two-channel configurations showed to be more robust to head misalignments than the four-channel configurations.

1.
O.
Kirkeby
,
P. A.
Nelson
,
H.
Hamada
, and
F.
Orduna-Bustamante
, “
Fast deconvolution of multi-channel systems using regularization
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
6
,
189
194
(
1998
).
2.
O.
Kirkeby
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
Digital filter design for inversion problems in sound reproduction
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
47
,
583
595
(
1999
).
3.
P. A.
Nelson
,
F.
Orduna-Bustamante
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Inverse filter design and equalization zones in multichannel sound reproduction
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
3
,
185
192
(
1995
).
4.
D. B.
Ward
, “
Joint least squares optimization for robust acoustic crosstalk cancellation
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
8
,
211
215
(
2000
).
5.
M. R.
Bai
and
C. -C.
Lee
, “
Development and implementation of cross-talk cancellation system in spatial audio reproduction based on subband filtering
,”
J. Sound Vib.
290
,
1269
1289
(
2006
).
6.
M. R.
Bai
and
C. -C.
Lee
, “
Objective and subjective analysis of effects of listening angle on crosstalk cancellation in spatial sound reproduction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
1976
1989
(
2006
).
7.
O.
Kirkeby
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
The ‘stereo dipole’—A virtual source imaging system using two closely spaced loudspeakers
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
46
,
387
395
(
1998
).
8.
D. B.
Ward
and
G. W.
Elko
, “
Effect of loudspeaker position on the robustness of acoustic crosstalk cancellation
,”
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.
6
,
106
108
(
1999
).
9.
T.
Takeuchi
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
Optimal source distribution for binaural synthesis over loudspeakers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
2786
2797
(
2002
).
10.
J.
Bauck
, “
A simple loudspeaker array and associated crosstalk canceler for improved 3D audio
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
49
,
3
13
(
2001
).
11.
Y. L.
Parodi
, “
Analysis of design parameters for crosstalk cancellation filter applied to different loudspeaker configurations
,” in
125th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
, San Francisco, CA (
2008
).
12.
W. G.
Gardner
,
3-D Audio Using Loudspeakers
, 1st ed. (
Kluwer Academic
,
Dordrecht
,
1998
).
13.
T.
Takeuchi
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
Robustness to head misalignment of virtual sound imaging systems
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
958
971
(
2001
).
14.
H.
Møller
, “
Reproduction of artificial-head recordings through loudspeakers
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
37
,
30
33
(
1989
).
15.
A. N.
Tikhonov
, “
Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method
,”
Sov. Math. Dokl.
4
,
1035
1038
(
1963
).
16.
J. G.
Proakis
and
D. G.
Manolakis
,
Digital Signal Processing
, 3rd ed. (
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1996
).
17.
M. R.
Bai
,
G.
Shih
, and
C.
Lee
, “
Comparative study of audio spatializers for dual-loudspeaker mobile phone
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
298
309
(
2007
).
18.
O.
Kirkeby
,
P. A.
Nelson
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Local sound field reproduction using two closely spaced loudspeakers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
1973
1981
(
1998
).
19.
F.
Christensen
,
C. B.
Jensen
, and
H.
Møller
, “
The design of VALDEMAR—An artificial head for binaural recordings purposes
,” in
109th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
, Los Angeles, CA (
2000
), p.
5253
.
20.
P.
Hansen
and
D.
O’Leary
, “
The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (USA)
14
,
1487
1503
(
1993
).
21.
Y.
Kim
and
P. A.
Nelson
, “
Optimal regularisation for acoustic source reconstruction by inverse methods
,”
J. Sound Vib.
275
,
463
487
(
2004
).
22.
C. R.
Vogel
, “
Non-convergence of the L-curve regularization parameter selection method
,”
Inverse Probl.
12
,
535
547
(
1996
).
23.
Y.
Lacouture Parodi
and
P.
Rubak
, “
Preliminary evaluation of sweet spot size in virtual sound reproduction using dipoles
,” in
126th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
, Munich, Germany (
2009
).
You do not currently have access to this content.