Does experience with a perceptual cue for a phoneme contrast in the native language affect its use in a second language for a similar contrast in a different phonetic context? Two experiments investigated Dutch and English listeners’ use of preceding vowel duration as a perceptual cue for nonword-final fricative voicing in English. Dutch listeners have native language experience with the use of vowel duration for vowel length and intervocalic obstruent voicing contrasts, but not for final voicing contrasts, as Dutch does not have voiced obstruents word-finally. Previous research [Broersma, M. (2005). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3890–3901; Broersma, M.(2008) J. Acoust. Soc. Am.124, 712–715] showed that Dutch listeners used vowel duration less for final /v-f/ categorization than English listeners did when vowel duration varied only between subjects, discouraging its use as a perceptual cue. The present study assessed the use of vowel duration for final /v-f/ and /z-s/ contrasts when it varied within subjects. A goodness rating and a phonetic categorization experiment showed that Dutch listeners used vowel duration, but less than English listeners did. Thus, experience with a perceptual cue for a different contrast and for a similar contrast in a different position in the native language did not lead to native-like use of this cue in the second language.
REFERENCES
1.
Best
, C. T.
, McRoberts
, G. W.
, and Sithole
, N. M.
(1988
). “Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants
,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
14
, 345
–360
.2.
Best
, C. T.
, and Strange
, W.
(1992
). “Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants
,” J. Phonetics
20
, 305
–330
.3.
Best
, C. T.
, and Tyler
, M. D.
(2007
). “Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities
,” in Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege
, edited by O. -S.
Bohn
and M. J.
Munro
(John Benjamins
, Amsterdam
), pp. 13
–34
.4.
Bohn
, O. -S.
(1995
). “Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all
,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research
, edited by W.
Strange
(York Press
, Baltimore, MD
), pp. 279
–303
.5.
Bohn
, O. -S.
and Munro
, M. J.
, eds. (2007
). Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege
(John Benjamins
, Amsterdam
).6.
7.
Bradlow
, A. R.
(1996
). “A perceptual comparison of the /i/-/e/ and /u/-/o/ contrasts in English and Spanish: Universal and language-specific aspects
,” Phonetica
53
, 55
–85
.8.
Broersma
, M.
(2005
). “Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
, 3890
–3901
.9.
Broersma
, M.
(2008
). “Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
, 712
–715
.10.
Crowther
, C. S.
, and Mann
, V.
(1992
). “Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 711
–722
.11.
Crystal
, T. H.
, and House
, A. S.
(1988
). “A note on the durations of fricatives in American English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
, 1932
–1935
.12.
Denes
, P.
(1955
). “Effect of duration on the perception of voicing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
27
, 761
–764
.13.
Derr
, M. A.
, and Massaro
, D. W.
(1980
). “The contribution of vowel duration, F0 contour, and frication duration as cues to the /juz/-/jus/ distinction
,” Percept. Psychophys.
27
, 51
–59
.14.
Fitch
, H. L.
, Halwes
, T.
, Erickson
, D. M.
, and Liberman
, A. M.
(1980
). “Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner
,” Percept. Psychophys.
27
, 343
–350
.15.
Flege
, J. E.
(1995
). “Second language learning: Theory, findings, and problems
,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research
, edited by W.
Strange
(York Press
, Baltimore, MD
), pp. 233
–272
.16.
Flege
, J. E.
, and Hillenbrand
, J.
(1986
). “Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
, 508
–517
.17.
Hogan
, J. T.
, and Rozsypal
, A. J.
(1980
). “Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue to the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 1764
–1771
.18.
19.
Jongman
, A.
, Sereno
, J. A.
, Raaijmakers
, M.
, and Lahiri
, A.
(1992
). “The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception
,” Lang Speech
35
, 137
–152
.20.
Jongman
, A.
, Wayland
, R.
, and Wong
, S.
(2000
). “Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
, 1252
–1263
.21.
Peterson
, G. E.
, and Lehiste
, I.
(1960
). “Duration of syllable nuclei in English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
, 693
–703
.22.
Raphael
, L. J.
(1972
). “Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
51
, 1296
–1303
.23.
Repp
, B. H.
(1981
). “Perceptual equivalence of two kinds of ambiguous speech stimuli
,” Bull. Psychon. Soc.
18
, 12
–14
.24.
Silbert
, N.
, and De Jong
, K.
(2008
). “Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: Patterns of variation in fricative production
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 2769
–2779
.25.
Sinnott
, J. M.
, and Saporita
, T. A.
(2000
). “Differences in American English, Spanish, and monkey perception of the say-stay trading relation
,” Percept. Psychophys.
62
, 1312
–1319
.26.
Slis
, I. H.
, and Cohen
, A.
(1969a
). “On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction I
,” Lang Speech
12
, 80
–102
.27.
Slis
, I. H.
, and Cohen
, A.
(1969b
). “On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction II
,” Lang Speech
12
, 137
–155
.28.
Slis
, I. H.
, and Van Heugten
, M.
(1989
). “Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives
,” in Linguistics in The Netherlands 1989
, edited by H.
Bennis
and A.
Van Kemenade
(Foris
, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
), pp. 123
–132
.29.
Stevenson
, D. C.
(1979
). “Categorical perception and selective adaptation phenomena in speech
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Canada.30.
Strange
, W.
(1995
). Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research
(York Press
, Baltimore, MD
).31.
Van den Berg
, R. J. H.
(1987
). “Effects of durational factors on the perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences
,” J. Phonetics
15
, 259
–271
.32.
Van den Berg
, R. J. H.
(1988
). “The perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: A comparison of synthetic and natural speech
,” J. Phonetics
16
, 171
–180
.33.
Van den Berg
, R. J. H.
(1989
). “Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cues
,” Speech Commun.
8
, 17
–25
.34.
Watson
, I.
(1983
). “Cues to the voicing contrast: A survey
,” Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics
2
, 1
–34
.© 2010 Acoustical Society of America.
2010
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.